1. Adapting and validating the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Version 2 for use with deaf children and young people
- Author
-
Jennifer Sweetman, Emily Hayward, Victoria Fernandez Garcia De las Heras, Rebecca Hargate, J Martin Bland, Helen McConachie, Rachel Hodkinson, Victoria Allgar, Ann Le Couteur, Barry Wright, Anna Hughes, Hannah George, and Helen Phillips
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Validation study ,Adolescent ,Autism Spectrum Disorder ,Nice ,Audiology ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Developmental and Educational Psychology ,medicine ,Humans ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Autistic Disorder ,Child ,computer.programming_language ,Public health ,05 social sciences ,Guideline ,medicine.disease ,Autism spectrum disorder ,Autism ,Psychology ,computer ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Specialization ,050104 developmental & child psychology - Abstract
We report a Delphi Consensus modification and first validation study of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule – 2 with deaf children and young people (ADOS-2 Deaf adaptation). Validation included 122 deaf participants (aged 2–18 years), 63 with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This was compared to a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline standard clinical assessment by blinded independent specialist clinicians. Results showed overall sensitivity 73% (95%CI 60%, 83%); specificity 71% (95%CI 58%, 82%), and for the more common modules 1–3 (combined as in previous studies) sensitivity 79% (95% CI 65–89%); specificity 79% (95% CI 66–89%) suggesting this instrument will be a helpful addition for use with deaf children and young people.
- Published
- 2021