Search

Currently, due to the low quality of RNA caused by degradation or low abundance, the accuracy of gene expression measurements by transcriptome sequencing (RNA‐seq) is very challenging for non‐research‐oriented clinical samples, majority of which are preserved in hospitals or tissue banks worldwide with complete pathological information and follow‐up data. Molecular signatures consisting of several genes are rarely applied to such samples. To utilize these resources effectively, 45 stage II non‐research‐oriented samples which were formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) colorectal carcinoma samples (CRC) using RNA‐seq have been analysed. Our results showed that although gene expression measurements were significantly affected, most cancer features, based on the relative expression orderings (REOs) of gene pairs, were well preserved. We then developed two REO‐based signatures, which consisted of 136 gene pairs for early diagnosis of CRC, and 4500 gene pairs for predicting post‐surgery relapse risk of stage II and III CRC. The performance of our signatures, which included hundreds or thousands of gene pairs, was more robust for non‐research‐oriented clinical samples, compared to that of two published concise REO‐based signatures. In conclusion, REO‐based signatures with relatively more gene pairs could be robustly applied to non‐research‐oriented CRC samples.

Background The qualitative transcriptional characteristics, the within‐sample relative expression orderings (REOs) of genes, are highly robust against batch effects and sample quality variations. Hence, we develop a qualitative transcriptional signature based on REOs to predict the biochemical recurrence risk of prostate cancer (PCa) patients after radical prostatectomy. Methods Gene pairs with REOs significantly correlated with the biochemical recurrence‐free survival (BFS) were identified from 131 PCa samples in the training data set. From these gene pairs, we selected a qualitative transcriptional signature based on the within‐sample REOs of gene pairs which could predict the recurrence risk of PCa patients after radical prostatectomy. Results A signature consisting of 74 gene pairs, named 74‐GPS, was developed for predicting the recurrence risk of PCa patients after radical prostatectomy based on the majority voting rule that a sample was assigned as high risk when at least 37 gene pairs of the 74‐GPS voted for high risk; otherwise, low risk. The signature was validated in six independent datasets produced by different platforms. In each of the validation datasets, the Kaplan‐Meier survival analysis showed that the average BFS of the low‐risk group was significantly better than that of the high‐risk group. Analyses of multiomics data of PCa samples from TCGA suggested that both the epigenomic and genomic alternations could cause the reproducible transcriptional differences between the two different prognostic groups. Conclusions The proposed qualitative transcriptional signature can robustly stratify PCa patients after radical prostatectomy into two groups with different recurrence risk and distinct multiomics characteristics. Hence, 74‐GPS may serve as a helpful tool for guiding the management of PCa patients with radical prostatectomy at the individual level.

Tumor-infiltrating immune cells are important components in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and different types of these cells exert different effects on tumor development and progression; these effects depend upon the type of cancer involved. Several methods have been developed for estimating the proportion of immune cells using bulk transcriptome data. However, there is a distinct lack of methods that are capable of predicting the immune contexture in specific types of cancer. Furthermore, the existing methods are based on absolute gene expression and are susceptible to experimental batch effects, thus resulting in incomparability across different datasets. In this study, we considered two common neoplasms as examples (colorectal cancer [CRC] and melanoma) and introduced the Tumor-infiltrating Immune Cell Proportion Estimator (TICPE), a cancer-specific qualitative method for estimating the proportion of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. The TICPE was based on the relative expression orderings (REOs) of gene pairs within a sample and is notably insensitive to batch effects. Performance evaluation using public expression data with mRNA mixtures, single-cell RNA-Seq (scRNA-Seq) data, immunohistochemistry data, and simulated bulk RNA-seq samples, indicated that the TICPE can estimate the proportion of immune cells with levels of accuracy that are clearly superior to other methods. Furthermore, we showed that the TICPE could effectively detect prognostic signals in patients with tumors and changes in the fractions of immune cells during immunotherapy in melanoma. In conclusion, our work presented a unique novel method, TICPE, to estimate the proportion of immune cells in specific cancer types and explore the effect of the infiltration of immune cells on the efficacy of immunotherapy and the prognosis of cancer. The source code for TICPE is available at https://github.com/huitingxiao/TICPE.

Currently, using biopsy specimens for the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) is not entirely reliable due to insufficient sampling amount and inaccurate sampling location. Thus, it is necessary to develop a signature that can accurately identify patients with CRC under these clinical scenarios. Based on the relative expression orderings of genes within individual samples, we developed a qualitative transcriptional signature to discriminate CRC tissues, including CRC adjacent normal tissues from non‐CRC individuals. The signature was validated using multiple microarray and RNA sequencing data from different sources. In the training data, a signature consisting of 7 gene pairs was identified. It was well validated in both biopsy and surgical resection specimens from multiple datasets measured by different platforms. For biopsy specimens, 97.6% of 42 CRC tissues and 94.5% of 163 non‐CRC (normal or inflammatory bowel disease) tissues were correctly classified. For surgically resected specimens, 99.5% of 854 CRC tissues and 96.3% of 81 CRC adjacent normal tissues were correctly identified as CRC. Notably, we additionally measured 33 CRC biopsy specimens by the Affymetrix platform and 13 CRC surgical resection specimens, with different proportions of tumor epithelial cells, ranging from 40% to 100%, by the RNA sequencing platform, and all these samples were correctly identified as CRC. The signature can be used for the early diagnosis of CRC, which is also suitable for minimum biopsy specimens and inaccurately sampled specimens, and thus has potential value for clinical application.

It is currently difficult for pathologists to diagnose pancreatic cancer (PC) using biopsy specimens because samples may have been from an incorrect site or contain an insufficient amount of tissue. Thus, there is a need to develop a platform-independent molecular classifier that accurately distinguishes benign pancreatic lesions from PC. Here, we developed a robust qualitative messenger RNA signature based on within-sample relative expression orderings (REOs) of genes to discriminate both PC tissues and cancer-adjacent normal tissues from non-PC pancreatitis and healthy pancreatic tissues. A signature comprising 12 gene pairs and 17 genes was built in the training datasets and validated in microarray and RNA-sequencing datasets from biopsy samples and surgically resected samples. Analysis of 1,007 PC tissues and 257 non-tumor samples from nine databases indicated that the geometric mean of sensitivity and specificity was 96.7%, and the area under receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.978 (95% confidence interval, 0.947-0.994). For 20 specimens obtained from endoscopic biopsy, the signature had a diagnostic accuracy of 100%. The REO-based signature described here can aid in the molecular diagnosis of PC and may facilitate objective differentiation between benign and malignant pancreatic lesions.

It is a basic task in high-throughput gene expression profiling studies to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between two phenotypes. But the weakly differential expression signals between two phenotypes are hardly detectable with limited sample sizes. To solve this problem, many researchers tried to combine multiple independent datasets using meta-analysis or batch effect adjustment algorithms. However, these algorithms may distort true biological differences between two phenotypes and introduce unacceptable high false rates, as demonstrated in this study. These problems pose critical obstacles for analyzing the transcriptional data in The Cancer Genome Atlas where there are many small-scale batches of data. Previously, we developed RankComp to detect DEGs for individual disease samples through exploiting the incongruous relative expression orderings between two phenotypes and further improved it here to identify DEGs using multiple independent datasets. We demonstrated the improved RankComp can directly analyze integrated cross-site data to detect DEGs between two phenotypes without the need of batch effect adjustments. Its usage was illustrated in detecting weak differential expression signals of breast cancer drug-response data using combined datasets from multiple experiments.

// Rou Chen 1, * , Qingzhou Guan 1, * , Jun Cheng 1 , Jun He 1 , Huaping Liu 1 , Hao Cai 1 , Guini Hong 1 , Jiahui Zhang 1 , Na Li 1 , Lu Ao 1 , Zheng Guo 1 1 Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Department of Bioinformatics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China * These authors contributed equally as first authors Correspondence to: Zheng Guo, email: guoz@ems.hrbmu.edu.cn Keywords: formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples, fresh-frozen samples, RNA degradation, gene expression measurements, relative expression orderings Received: October 27, 2016 Accepted: December 02, 2016 Published: December 27, 2016 ABSTRACT Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples represent a valuable resource for clinical researches. However, FFPE samples are usually considered an unreliable source for gene expression analysis due to the partial RNA degradation. In this study, through comparing gene expression profiles between FFPE samples and paired fresh-frozen (FF) samples for three cancer types, we firstly showed that expression measurements of thousands of genes had at least two-fold change in FFPE samples compared with paired FF samples. Therefore, for a transcriptional signature based on risk scores summarized from the expression levels of the signature genes, the risk score thresholds trained from FFPE (or FF) samples could not be applied to FF (or FFPE) samples. On the other hand, we found that more than 90% of the relative expression orderings (REOs) of gene pairs in the FF samples were maintained in their paired FFPE samples and largely unaffected by the storage time. The result suggested that the REOs of gene pairs were highly robust against partial RNA degradation in FFPE samples. Finally, as a case study, we developed a REOs-based signature to distinguish liver cirrhosis from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using FFPE samples. The signature was validated in four datasets of FFPE samples and eight datasets of FF samples. In conclusion, the valuable FFPE samples can be fully exploited to identify REOs-based diagnostic and prognostic signatures which could be robustly applicable to both FF samples and FFPE samples with degraded RNA.

Background: For lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients receiving platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT), predictive signatures extracted from survival data solely are not directly associated with platinum response. Another limitation of reported signatures, commonly based on risk scores summarised from gene expressions, is that they could not be applied directly to samples measured by different laboratories due to experimental batch effects. Methods: Using 60 samples of LUAD patients receiving platinum-based ACT in TCGA, we pre-selected gene pairs whose within-samples relative expression orderings (REOs) were significantly associated with both pathological response and 5-year survival, from which we selected an optimal signature whose within-samples REOs could identify responders with improved 5-year survival rate. Results: A predictive signature consisting of three gene pairs was developed. In an independent data set integrated from five small data sets, the predicted responders had a significantly higher 5-year survival rate than the predicted non-responders if and only if they received platinum-based ACT (log-rank P=0.0006). The predicted responders showed a 22% absolute benefit of platinum-based ACT in 5-year survival rate compared with untreated patients (log-rank P=0.0019). Conclusions: The REO-based signature can individually predict response to platinum-based ACT with concordant survival benefit directly for LUAD samples measured by different laboratories.

Resistance to platinum and taxane adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) is the main cause of the recurrence and poor prognosis of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGS-OvCa) patients receiving platinum-taxane ACT after surgery. However, currently reported quantitative transcriptional signatures, which are commonly based on risk scores summarized from gene expression, are unsuitable for clinical application because of their high sensitivity to experimental batch effects and quality uncertainties of clinical samples. Using 226 samples of HGS-OvCa patients receiving platinum-taxane ACT in TCGA, we developed a qualitative transcriptional signature, consisting of four gene pairs whose within-samples relative expression orderings could robustly predict patient recurrence-free survival (RFS). In two independent test datasets, the predicted non-responders had significantly shorter RFS than the predicted responders (log-rank p < 0.05). In a test dataset containing data for patient pathological response state, the signature reclassified 12 out of 22 pathological complete response patients as non-responders and two out of 16 pathological non-complete response patients as responders. Notably, the 12 predicted non-responders in the pathological complete response group had significantly shorter RFS than the predicted responders (log-rank p = 0.0122). This qualitative transcriptional signature, which is insensitive to experimental batch effects and quality uncertainties of clinical samples, can individually identify HGS-OvCa patients who are more likely to benefit from platinum-taxane adjuvant chemotherapy.

Background Pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (PSC-CMs) are widely used models for regenerative medicine and disease research. However, PSC-CMs are usually immature in morphology and functionality and the maturity of PSC-CMs could not be determined accurately. In order to reasonably interpret the experimental results obtained by PSC-CMs, it is necessary to evaluate the maturity of PSC-CMs and find the key genes related to maturation. Methods Using the gene expression profiles of normal adult cardiac tissue and embryonic stem cell (ESC) samples, we identified gene pairs with identically relative expression orderings (REOs) within adult cardiac tissue but reversely identical in ESCs. Then, for a PSC-CM model, we calculated the maturity score as the percentage of these gene pairs that exhibit the same REOs in adult cardiac tissue. Lastly, the CellComp method was used to identify the maturation-related genes. Results The maturity score increased gradually from 0.8401 for 18-week fetal cardiac tissue to 0.9997 for adult cardiac tissue. For four human PSC-CM models, the mature scores increased with prolonged culture time but were all below 0.8. The genes involved in energy metabolism, angiogenesis, immunity, and proliferation were dysregulated in the 1-year PSC-CMs compared with adult cardiac tissue. Conclusion We proposed a qualitative transcriptional signature to score the maturity degree of PSC-CMs. This score can reasonably track the maturity of PSC-CMs and be used to compare different PSC-CM culture methods. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13287-019-1205-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Previously reported prognostic signatures for predicting the prognoses of postsurgical hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients are commonly based on predefined risk scores, which are hardly applicable to samples measured by different laboratories. To solve this problem, using gene expression profiles of 170 stage I/II HCC samples, we identified a prognostic signature consisting of 20 gene pairs whose within-sample relative expression orderings (REOs) could robustly predict the disease-free survival and overall survival of HCC patients. This REOs-based prognostic signature was validated in two independent datasets. Functional enrichment analysis showed that the patients with high-risk of recurrence were characterized by the activations of pathways related to cell proliferation and tumor microenvironment, whereas the low-risk patients were characterized by the activations of various metabolism pathways. We further investigated the distinct epigenomic and genomic characteristics of the two prognostic groups using The Cancer Genome Atlas samples with multi-omics data. Epigenetic analysis showed that the transcriptional differences between the two prognostic groups were significantly concordant with DNA methylation alternations. The signaling network analysis identified several key genes (e.g. TP53, MYC) with epigenomic or genomic alternations driving poor prognoses of HCC patients. These results help us understand the multi-omics mechanisms determining the outcomes of HCC patients.

Background Due to experimental batch effects, the application of a quantitative transcriptional signature for disease diagnoses commonly requires inter-sample data normalization, which would be hardly applicable under common clinical settings. Many cancers might have qualitative differences with the non-cancer states in the gene expression pattern. Therefore, it is reasonable to explore the power of qualitative diagnostic signatures which are robust against experimental batch effects and other random factors. Results Firstly, using data of technical replicate samples from the MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project, we demonstrated that the low-throughput PCR-based technologies also exist large measurement variations for gene expression even when the samples were measured in the same test site. Then, we demonstrated the critical limitation of low stability for classifiers based on quantitative transcriptional signatures in applications to individual samples through a case study using a support vector machine and a naïve Bayesian classifier to discriminate colorectal cancer tissues from normal tissues. To address this problem, we identified a signature consisting of three gene pairs for discriminating colorectal cancer tissues from non-cancer (normal and inflammatory bowel disease) tissues based on within-sample relative expression orderings (REOs) of these gene pairs. The signature was well verified using 22 independent datasets measured by different microarray and RNA_seq platforms, obviating the need of inter-sample data normalization. Conclusions Subtle quantitative information of gene expression measurements tends to be unstable under current technical conditions, which will introduce uncertainty to clinical applications of the quantitative transcriptional diagnostic signatures. For diagnosis of disease states with qualitative transcriptional characteristics, the qualitative REO-based signatures could be robustly applied to individual samples measured by different platforms. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-018-4446-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.