Search

Summary We provide an overview on the use of biological assays to calibrate and initialize mechanism-based models of cancer phenomena. Although artificial intelligence methods currently dominate the landscape in computational oncology, mathematical models that seek to explicitly incorporate biological mechanisms into their formalism are of increasing interest. These models can guide experimental design and provide insights into the underlying mechanisms of cancer progression. Historically, these models have included a myriad of parameters that have been difficult to quantify in biologically relevant systems, limiting their practical insights. Recently, however, there has been much interest calibrating biologically based models with the quantitative measurements available from (for example) RNA sequencing, time-resolved microscopy, and in vivo imaging. In this contribution, we summarize how a variety of experimental methods quantify tumor characteristics from the molecular to tissue scales and describe how such data can be directly integrated with mechanism-based models to improve predictions of tumor growth and treatment response., Graphical Abstract, Bioengineering; Systems Biology; Cancer; In Silico Biology

Microfluidic technology has led to the development of advanced in vitro tumor platforms that overcome the challenges of in vivo animal and in vitro two dimensional models. This paper presents platform designs and methods used to develop complex vascularized in vitro models to mimic the tumor microenvironment. Features of these platforms include a continuous, aligned endothelium that allows for cell-cell interactions between vasculature and tumor cells. A novel platform for fabrication of a single endothelialized microchannel encased within a collagen platform hosting breast cancer cells was developed and utilized to study the influence of cellular interaction on transport phenomenon through vasculature in a hyperpermeable tumor microenvironment. This platform relies on subtractive tissue engineering fabrication techniques. Through confocal imaging we have demonstrated that the platform produces enhanced vessel leakiness recapitulating physiological features of the tumor microenvironment. The influence of tumor endothelial interactions on transport of particles was also demonstrated. Additionally, we designed two more complex and intricate endothelialized microfluidic networks by combining lithographic techniques with additive tissue engineering methods. We created a network platform consisting of interconnected microchannels to model a highly vascularized system and successfully perfused the system with fluorescent particles. Finally, we developed a physiologically representative in vitro microfluidic platform with vasculature patterned from in vivo data showing the versatility of these systems to replicate the complex geometries of tumor microvasculature and dynamically measured particle transport. Overall, we have shown the ability to develop functional microfluidic vascular tumor platforms of varying complexities and demonstrated their utility for studying spatial particle transport within these systems.

New directions in medical and biomedical sciences have gradually emerged over recent years that will change the way diseases are diagnosed and treated and are leading to the redirection of medicine toward patient-specific treatments. We refer to these new approaches for studying biomedical systems as predictive medicine, a new version of medical science that involves the use of advanced computer models of biomedical phenomena, high-performance computing, new experimental methods for model data calibration, modern imaging technologies, cutting-edge numerical algorithms for treating large stochastic systems, modern methods for model selection, calibration, validation, verification, and uncertainty quantification, and new approaches for drug design and delivery, all based on predictive models. The methodologies are designed to study events at multiple scales, from genetic data, to sub-cellular signaling mechanisms, to cell interactions, to tissue physics and chemistry, to organs in living human subjects. The present document surveys work on the development and implementation of predictive models of vascular tumor growth, covering aspects of what might be called modeling-and-experimentally based computational oncology. The work described is that of a multi-institutional team, centered at ICES with strong participation by members at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center and University of Texas at San Antonio. This exposition covers topics on signaling models, cell and cell-interaction models, tissue models based on multi-species mixture theories, models of angiogenesis, and beginning work of drug effects. A number of new parallel computer codes for implementing finite-element methods, multi-level Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling methods, data classification methods, stochastic PDE solvers, statistical inverse algorithms for model calibration and validation, models of events at different spatial and temporal scales is presented. Importantly, new methods for model selection in the presence of uncertainties fundamental to predictive medical science, are described which are based on the notion of Bayesian model plausibilities. Also, as part of this general approach, new codes for determining the sensitivity of model outputs to variations in model parameters are described that provide a basis for assessing the importance of model parameters and controlling and reducing the number of relevant model parameters. Model specific data is to be accessible through careful and model-specific platforms in the Tumor Engineering Laboratory. We describe parallel computer platforms on which large-scale calculations are run as well as specific time-marching algorithms needed to treat stiff systems encountered in some phase-field mixture models. We also cover new non-invasive imaging and data classification methods that provide in vivo data for model validation. The study concludes with a brief discussion of future work and open challenges.

Traditional experimental platforms to study cancer biology consist of two-dimensional (2D) cell culture systems and animal models. Although 2D cell cultures have yielded fundamental insights into cancer biology, they do not provide a physiologically representative three-dimensional (3D) volume for cell attachment and infiltration. These systems also cannot recapitulate critical features of the tumor microenvironment including hemodynamics, matrix mechanics, cellular crosstalk, and matrix interactions in a dynamic manner, or impose chemical and mechanical gradients. While animal models provide physiologic fidelity, they can be highly variable and cost prohibitive for extensive biological investigation and therapeutic optimization. Furthermore, the interplay of many different microenvironmental variables, such as growth factors, immune reaction, and stromal interactions, make it difficult to isolate the effect of a specific stimulus on cell response using animal models. Due to these limitations, 3D in vitro tumor models have recently emerged as valuable tools for the study of cancer progression as these systems have the ability to overcome many of the limitations of static 2D monolayers and mammalian systems. Initial 3D in vitro models have consisted of static 3D co-culture platforms and have been successful in providing a deeper insight compared to animal and static 2D systems. However, the majority of these existing systems lack the presence of physiological flow, a pivotal stimuli in tumor growth and metastasis and important consideration for transport of diagnostic or therapeutic agents. In order to consider the influence of flow on cancer progression microfluidic platforms are being widely used. The integration of microfluidic technology and microfabrication techniques with tumor biology has resulted in complex 3D microfluidic platforms capable of investigating various key stages in cancer evolution including angiogenesis and metastasis. 3D microfluidic platforms are able to provide a physiologically representative tumor environment while allowing for dynamic monitoring and simultaneous control of multiple factors such as cellular and extracellular matrix composition, fluid velocity and wall shear stress, and both biochemical and mechanical gradients.