1. Diagnostic Value of Combining Tumor and Inflammatory Markers in Lung Cancer
- Author
-
Yoon Kyung Jeon, Chul Woo Kim, Yongdai Kim, Ho Il Yoon, Yong Sung Shin, Ho Sang Shin, Kyung Nam Kang, Eun Hee Yeon, Kwon Oh Ran, Ilseon Hwang, and Keon Young Kwon
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Oncology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Early detection ,respiratory system ,medicine.disease ,respiratory tract diseases ,03 medical and health sciences ,030104 developmental biology ,0302 clinical medicine ,Lung neoplasms ,Serum biomarkers ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Internal medicine ,Metabolic markers ,medicine ,Biomarker (medicine) ,Original Article ,Corrigendum ,business ,Lung cancer ,Biomarkers - Abstract
Background Despite major advances in lung cancer treatment, early detection remains the most promising way of improving outcomes. To detect lung cancer in earlier stages, many serum biomarkers have been tested. Unfortunately, no single biomarker can reliably detect lung cancer. We combined a set of 2 tumor markers and 4 inflammatory or metabolic markers and tried to validate the diagnostic performance in lung cancer. Methods We collected serum samples from 355 lung cancer patients and 590 control subjects and divided them into training and validation datasets. After measuring serum levels of 6 biomarkers (human epididymis secretory protein 4 [HE4], carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA], regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted [RANTES], apolipoprotein A2 [ApoA2], transthyretin [TTR], and secretory vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 [sVCAM-1]), we tested various sets of biomarkers for their diagnostic performance in lung cancer. Results In a training dataset, the area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.821 for HE4, 0.753 for CEA, 0.858 for RANTES, 0.867 for ApoA2, 0.830 for TTR, and 0.552 for sVCAM-1. A model using all 6 biomarkers and age yielded an AUC value of 0.986 and sensitivity of 93.2% (cutoff at specificity 94%). Applying this model to the validation dataset showed similar results. The AUC value of the model was 0.988, with sensitivity of 93.33% and specificity of 92.00% at the same cutoff point used in the validation dataset. Analyses by stages and histologic subtypes all yielded similar results. Conclusions Combining multiple tumor and systemic inflammatory markers proved to be a valid strategy in the diagnosis of lung cancer.
- Published
- 2016