1. Effect of Die Spacer Thickness on the Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Veneers on Maxillary First Premolars
- Author
-
Sherine Mohamed Farag, Rania Reda Afifi, and Mona M. Ghoneim
- Subjects
Materials science ,business.product_category ,0206 medical engineering ,Statistical difference ,Dentistry ,02 engineering and technology ,CAD/CAM ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,cement space ,Group (periodic table) ,Stereo microscope ,Lithium disilicate ,cement thickness ,General Dentistry ,Original Research ,Universal testing machine ,business.industry ,die spacer ,Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry ,030206 dentistry ,fracture resistance ,020601 biomedical engineering ,Fracture (geology) ,Die (manufacturing) ,Adhesive ,business ,lithium disilicate CAD veneers - Abstract
Sherine Mohamed Farag, Mona Mohamed Ghoneim, Rania Reda Afifi Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria, University, Alexandria, EgyptCorrespondence: Sherine Mohamed FaragConservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, 13 Champolion St, Azarita, Alexandria, EgyptTel +20 1552351433Email sherine.m.farag@gmail.comObjective: The purpose of this study was to compare the fracture resistance of ceramic veneers with digital die spacer settings at 20 μm, 40 μm, and 100 μm.Materials and Methods: Eighteen sound maxillary first premolars were divided into three groups (n=6) according to their digital die spacer settings: group A=20 μm, group B=40 μm, group C=100 μm. Each tooth was prepared to a depth of 0.5 mm to receive lithium disilicate veneers (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent). All groups were thermocycled (2500 cycles at 5– 55°C) and subjected to fracture resistance test using a universal testing machine until failure. Failure modes were examined using a stereomicroscope.Results: The values (N) for group A=1181.34± 301.33, group B=1014.29± 291.12, and group C=841.89± 244.59. One-way ANOVA showed no statistical difference among the three groups (p=0.145). However, chi-square test showed that a significant difference was present in the modes of failure (p=0.009). Tukey’s post hoc test indicated that the failure modes of group A were statistically different from those of group C, showing 83.3% adhesive failure for group A compared to 0% adhesive failures in group C. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.Conclusion: Digital die spacer thickness did not influence the mean fracture resistance values of CAD/CAM lithium disilicate veneers. However, the way the failure occurred differed significantly at various die spacer thicknesses.Keywords: fracture resistance, die spacer, lithium disilicate CAD veneers, CAD/CAM, cement thickness, cement space
- Published
- 2021