1. Molecular Dialogues between Early Divergent Fungi and Bacteria in an Antagonism versus a Mutualism
- Author
-
Nicole Shapiro, Marcel Huntemann, Andrii P. Gryganskyi, Xiaotian Qin, Natalia Ivanova, Neha Varghese, Natalia Mikhailova, Dimitrios Stamatis, Alicia Clum, T. B. K. Reddy, Lev D. Krasnovsky, Teresa E. Pawlowska, Manoj Pillay, Chris Daum, Olga A. Lastovetsky, Nikos C. Kyrpides, Maria L. Gaspar, Krishnaveni Palaniappan, Tanja Woyke, and Taylor, John W
- Subjects
Burkholderia ,Fungus ,Microbiology ,Host-Microbe Biology ,03 medical and health sciences ,Symbiosis ,Virology ,Antibiosis ,Genetics ,2.2 Factors relating to the physical environment ,Rhizopus microsporus ,Aetiology ,Gene ,innate immunity ,030304 developmental biology ,Mucoromycotina ,Mutualism (biology) ,reactive oxygen species ,0303 health sciences ,Innate immune system ,Mycetohabitans ,biology ,Bacteria ,030306 microbiology ,Gene Expression Profiling ,fungi ,Fungi ,food and beverages ,biology.organism_classification ,cell wall remodeling ,QR1-502 ,Emerging Infectious Diseases ,Infectious Diseases ,Infection ,Rhizopus ,Research Article ,Signal Transduction - Abstract
Animals and plants interact with microbes by engaging specific surveillance systems, regulatory networks, and response modules that allow for accommodation of mutualists and defense against antagonists. Antimicrobial defense responses are mediated in both animals and plants by innate immunity systems that owe their functional similarities to convergent evolution. Like animals and plants, fungi interact with bacteria. However, the principles governing these relations are only now being discovered. In a study system of host and nonhost fungi interacting with a bacterium isolated from the host, we found that bacteria used a common gene repertoire to engage both partners. In contrast, fungal responses to bacteria differed dramatically between the host and nonhost. These findings suggest that as in animals and plants, the genetic makeup of the fungus determines whether bacterial partners are perceived as mutualists or antagonists and what specific regulatory networks and response modules are initiated during each encounter., Fungal-bacterial symbioses range from antagonisms to mutualisms and remain one of the least understood interdomain interactions despite their ubiquity as well as ecological and medical importance. To build a predictive conceptual framework for understanding interactions between fungi and bacteria in different types of symbioses, we surveyed fungal and bacterial transcriptional responses in the mutualism between Rhizopus microsporus (Rm) (ATCC 52813, host) and its Mycetohabitans (formerly Burkholderia) endobacteria versus the antagonism between a nonhost Rm (ATCC 11559) and Mycetohabitans isolated from the host, at two time points, before and after partner physical contact. We found that bacteria and fungi sensed each other before contact and altered gene expression patterns accordingly. Mycetohabitans did not discriminate between the host and nonhost and engaged a common set of genes encoding known as well as novel symbiosis factors. In contrast, responses of the host versus nonhost to endobacteria were dramatically different, converging on the altered expression of genes involved in cell wall biosynthesis and reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolism. On the basis of the observed patterns, we formulated a set of hypotheses describing fungal-bacterial interactions and tested some of them. By conducting ROS measurements, we confirmed that nonhost fungi increased production of ROS in response to endobacteria, whereas host fungi quenched their ROS output, suggesting that ROS metabolism contributes to the nonhost resistance to bacterial infection and the host ability to form a mutualism. Overall, our study offers a testable framework of predictions describing interactions of early divergent Mucoromycotina fungi with bacteria.
- Published
- 2020