1. Classification, Prediction, and Concordance of Cognitive and Functional Progression in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment in the United States: A Latent Class Analysis
- Author
-
Mihaela V. Georgieva, Neema Lema, Lesley M. Butler, Raluca Ionescu-Ittu, Urvi Desai, JingJing Zhu, Thomas Kulalert, Keith A. Betts, Xavier M Teitsma, Paul Delmar, and Julie Mouchet
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Clinical Dementia Rating ,Concordance ,03 medical and health sciences ,mild cognitive impairment ,Cognition ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,mental disorders ,latent class analysis ,medicine ,Humans ,Dementia ,Cognitive Dysfunction ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Models, Statistical ,business.industry ,General Neuroscience ,Age Factors ,General Medicine ,Odds ratio ,Physical Functional Performance ,Mental Status and Dementia Tests ,medicine.disease ,Functional Activities Questionnaire ,United States ,Latent class model ,Confidence interval ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Clinical Psychology ,Disease Progression ,progression ,Geriatrics and Gerontology ,business ,Alzheimer’s disease ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Research Article - Abstract
Background: Progression trajectories of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are currently not well understood. Objective: To classify patients with incident MCI into different latent classes of progression and identify predictors of progression class. Methods: Participants with incident MCI were identified from the US National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set (09/2005-02/2019). Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR®) Dementia Staging Instrument-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score longitudinal trajectories from MCI diagnosis were fitted using growth mixture models. Predictors of progression class were identified using multivariate multinomial logistic regression models; odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Results: In total, 21%, 22%, and 57% of participants (N = 830) experienced fast, slow, and no progression on CDR-SB, respectively; for FAQ, these figures were 14%, 23%, and 64%, respectively. CDR-SB and FAQ class membership was concordant for most participants (77%). Older age (≥86 versus≤70 years, OR [95% CI] = 5.26 [1.78–15.54]), one copy of APOE ɛ4 (1.94 [1.08–3.47]), higher baseline CDR-SB (2.46 [1.56–3.88]), lower baseline MMSE (0.85 [0.75–0.97]), and higher baseline FAQ (1.13 [1.02–1.26]) scores were significant predictors of fast progression versus no progression based on CDR-SB (all p
- Published
- 2021