1. Ki-67 'hot spot' digital analysis is useful in the distinction of hepatic adenomas and well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas
- Author
-
Michael Torbenson, Trynda N. Kroneman, Andrea Jones, Rondell P. Graham, Taofic Mounajjed, Anthony J. Blahnik, and Roger K. Moreira
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Proliferative index ,Gastroenterology ,Pathology and Forensic Medicine ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Glutamine synthetase ,Internal medicine ,Medicine ,Serum amyloid A ,Molecular Biology ,biology ,business.industry ,Cell Biology ,General Medicine ,HCCS ,medicine.disease ,digestive system diseases ,030104 developmental biology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Ki-67 ,Hepatocellular carcinoma ,biology.protein ,Immunohistochemistry ,Antibody ,business - Abstract
This study aims to investigate the utility of digital protocols for Ki-67 immunohistochemistry quantitative analysis (“hot spot” method) in the setting of well-differentiated hepatocellular neoplasms. Resection cases of typical hepatic adenomas (HAs) (n = 40), atypical HAs (n = 9), and well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas (WD HCCs) (n = 56) were selected. HAs were further classified by immunohistochemistry using antibodies against liver fatty acid binding protein, glutamine synthetase, B-catenin, hepatic serum amyloid A, and C-reactive protein. Ki-67 proliferative index by immunohistochemistry was evaluated in all cases by digital analysis using a modified neuroendocrine tumor “hot spot” protocol. The proliferative rate of HAs (typical, median 1.2% (range 0–7.4%) and atypical, median 1.0% (range 0.3–3%)) was significantly lower than that of WD HCCs (median 4.5%, range 0–49.8%) (P
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF