Search

Resveratrol (RSV) is a natural polyphenolic antioxidant with a proven protective role in several human diseases involving oxidative stress, although the molecular mechanism underlying this effect remains unclear. The present work tried to elucidate the molecular mechanism of RSV's role on signal transduction modulation. Our biochemical analysis, including radioligand binding, real time PCR, western blotting and adenylyl cyclase activity, and computational studies provide insights into the RSV binding pathway, kinetics and the most favored binding pose involving adenosine receptors, mainly A2A subtype. In this study, we show that RSV target adenosine receptors (AdoRs), affecting gene expression, receptor levels, and the downstream adenylyl cyclase (AC)/PKA pathway. Our data demonstrate that RSV activates AdoRs. Moreover, RSV activate A2A receptors by directly binding to the classical orthosteric binding site. Intriguingly, RSV-induced receptor activation can stimulate or inhibit AC activity depending on concentration and exposure time. Such subtle and multifaceted regulation of the AdoRs/AC/PKA pathway might contribute to the protective role of RSV. Our findings suggest that RSV molecular action is mediated, at least in part, by activation of adenosine receptors and create the opportunity to interrogate the therapeutic use of RSV in pathological conditions involving AdoRs, such as Alzheimer.

Protein nanobodies have been used successfully as surrogates for unstable G-proteins in order to crystallize G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in their active states. We used molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, including metadynamics enhanced sampling, to investigate the similarities and differences between GPCR-agonist ternary complexes with the α-subunits of the appropriate G-proteins and those with the protein nanobodies (intracellular binding partners, IBPs) used for crystallization. In two of the three receptors considered, the agonist-binding mode differs significantly between the two alternative ternary complexes. The ternary-complex model of GPCR activation entails enhancement of ligand binding by bound IBPs: Our results show that IBP-specific changes can alter the agonist binding modes and thus also the criteria for designing GPCR agonists.

We propose an experimentally testable extended ternary complex model, where direction of the cooperative effect between ligand and intracellular binding partner (positive or negative) and its magnitude are predicted to be a characteristic of the ligand signaling bias., Signalling by G-protein coupled receptors usually occurs via ternary complexes formed under cooperative binding between the receptor, a ligand and an intracellular binding partner (a G-protein or β-arrestin). While a global rational for allosteric effects in ternary complexes would be of great help in designing ligands with specific effects, the paucity of structural data for ternary complexes with β-arrestin, together with the intrinsic difficulty of characterizing the dynamics involved in the allosteric coupling, have hindered the efforts to devise such a model. Here we have used enhanced-sampling atomistic molecular-dynamics simulations to investigate the dynamics and complex formation mechanisms of both β-arrestin- and Gs-complexes with the β2-adrenergic receptor (ADRB2) in its apo-form and in the presence of four small ligands that exert different allosteric effects. Our results suggest that the structure and dynamics of arrestin–ADRB2 complexes depend strongly on the nature of the small ligands. The complexes exhibit a variety of different coupling orientations in terms of the depth of the finger loop in the receptor and activation states of ADRB2. The simulations also allow us to characterize the cooperativity between the ligand and intracellular binding partner (IBP). Based on the complete and consistent results, we propose an experimentally testable extended ternary complex model, where direction of the cooperative effect between ligand and IBP (positive or negative) and its magnitude are predicted to be a characteristic of the ligand signaling bias. This paves the avenue to the rational design of ligands with specific functional effects.

The chemokine receptor CXCR3 is a G protein-coupled receptor that conveys extracellular signals into cells by changing its conformation upon ligand binding. We previously hypothesized that small-molecule allosteric CXCR3-agonists do not bind to the same allosteric binding pocket as 8-azaquinazolinone-based negative allosteric modulators. We have now performed molecular-dynamics (MD) simulations with metadynamics enhanced sampling on the CXCR3 system to refine structures and binding modes and to predict the CXCR3-binding affinities of the biased allosteric agonist FAUC1036 and the negative allosteric modulator RAMX3. We have identified two distinct binding sites; a "shallow" and a second "deeper" pocket to which the biased allosteric agonist FAUC1036 and negative allosteric modulator RAMX3 bind, respectively.

The cannabinoid CB1 receptor (CB1R) is an abundant metabotropic G-protein-coupled receptor that has been difficult to address therapeutically because of CNS side effects exerted by orthosteric drug candidates. Recent efforts have focused on developing allosteric modulators that target CB1R. Compounds from the recently discovered class of mixed agonistic and positive allosteric modulators (Ago-PAMs) based on 2-phenylindoles have shown promising functional and binding properties as CB1R ligands. Here, we identify binding modes of both the CP 55,940 agonist and GAT228, a 2-phenylindole allosteric modulator, by using our metadynamics simulation protocol, and quantify their affinity and cooperativity by atomistic simulations. We demonstrate the involvement of multiple adjunct binding sites in the Ago-PAM characteristics of the 2-phenylindole modulators and explain their ability to compete with orthosteric agonists at higher concentrations. We validate these results experimentally by showing the contribution of multiple sites on the allosteric binding of ZCZ011, another homologous member of the class, together with the orthosteric agonist.

Our recent explorations of allosteric modulators with improved properties resulted in the identification of two biased negative allosteric modulators, BD103 (N-1-{[3-(4-ethoxyphenyl)-4-oxo-3,4-dihydropyrido[2,3-d]pyrimi-din2yl]ethyl}-4-(4-fluorobutoxy)-N-[(1-methylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl}]butanamide) and BD064 (5-[(N-{1-[3-(4-ethoxyphenyl)-4-oxo-3,4-dihydropyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidin-2-yl]ethyl-2-[4-fluoro-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]acetamido)methyl]-2-fluorophenyl}boronic acid), that exhibited probe-dependent inhibition of CXC-motif chemokine receptor CXCR3 signaling. With the intention to elucidate the structural mechanisms underlying their selectivity and probe dependence, we used site-directed mutagenesis combined with homology modeling and docking to identify amino acids of CXCR3 that contribute to modulator binding, signaling, and transmission of cooperativity. With the use of allosteric radioligand RAMX3 ([3H]N-{1-[3-(4-ethoxyphenyl)-4-oxo-3,4-dihydropyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidin-2-yl]ethyl}-2-[4-fluoro-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-N-[(1-methylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl]acetamide), we identified that F1313.32 and Y3087.43 contribute specifically to the binding pocket of BD064, whereas D1864.60 solely participates in the stabilization of binding conformation of BD103. The influence of mutations on the ability of negative allosteric modulators to inhibit chemokine-mediated activation (CXCL11 and CXCL10) was assessed with the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based cAMP and β-arrestin recruitment assay. Obtained data revealed complex molecular mechanisms governing biased and probe-dependent signaling at CXCR3. In particular, F1313.32, S3047.39, and Y3087.43 emerged as key residues for the compounds to modulate the chemokine response. Notably, D1864.60, W2686.48, and S3047.39 turned out to play a role in signal pathway selectivity of CXCL10, as mutations of these residues led to a G protein-active but β-arrestin-inactive conformation. These diverse effects of mutations suggest the existence of ligand- and pathway-specific receptor conformations and give new insights in the sophisticated signaling machinery between allosteric ligands, chemokines, and their receptors, which can provide a powerful platform for the development of new allosteric drugs with improved pharmacological properties.

A generally applicable metadynamics scheme for predicting the free energy profile of ligand binding to G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is described. A common and effective collective variable (CV) has been defined using the ideally placed and highly conserved Trp6.48 as a reference point for ligand-GPCR distance measurement and the common orientation of GPCRs in the cell membrane. Using this single CV together with well-tempered multiple-walker metadynamics with a funnel-like boundary allows an efficient exploration of the entire ligand binding path from the extracellular medium to the orthosteric binding site, including vestibule and intermediate sites. The protocol can be used with X-ray structures or high-quality homology models (based on a high-quality template and after thorough refinement) for the receptor and is universally applicable to agonists, antagonists, and partial and reverse agonists. The root-mean-square error (RMSE) in predicted binding free energies for 12 diverse ligands in five receptors (a total of 23 data points) is surprisingly small (less than 1 kcal mol

Author(s): Fechner, Uli; de Graaf, Chris; Torda, Andrew E; Gussregen, Stefan; Evers, Andreas; Matter, Hans; Hessler, Gerhard; Richmond, Nicola J; Schmidtke, Peter; Segler, Marwin HS; Waller, Mark P; Pleik, Stefanie; Shea, Joan-Emma; Levine, Zachary; Mullen, Ryan; van den Broek, Karina; Epple, Matthias; Kuhn, Hubert; Truszkowski, Andreas; Zielesny, Achim; Fraaije, Johannes Hans; Gracia, Ruben Serral; Kast, Stefan M; Bulusu, Krishna C; Bender, Andreas; Yosipof, Abraham; Nahum, Oren; Senderowitz, Hanoch; Krotzky, Timo; Schulz, Robert; Wolber, Gerhard; Bietz, Stefan; Rarey, Matthias; Zimmermann, Markus O; Lange, Andreas; Ruff, Manuel; Heidrich, Johannes; Onlia, Ionut; Exner, Thomas E; Boeckler, Frank M; Bermudez, Marcel; Firaha, Dzmitry S; Holloczki, Oldamur; Kirchner, Barbara; Tautermann, Christofer S; Volkamer, Andrea; Eid, Sameh; Turk, Samo; Rippmann, Friedrich; Fulle, Simone; Saleh, Noureldin; Saladino, Giorgio; Gervasio, Francesco L; Haensele, Elke; Banting, Lee; Whitley, David C; Oliveira Santos, Jana Sopkova-de; Bureau, Ronan; Clark, Timothy; Sandmann, Achim; Lanig, Harald; Kibies, Patrick; Heil, Jochen; Hoffgaard, Franziska; Frach, Roland; Engel, Julian; Smith, Steven; Basu, Debjit; Rauh, Daniel; Kohlbacher, Oliver; Boeckler, Frank M; Essex, Jonathan W; Bodnarchuk, Michael S; Ross, Gregory A; Finkelmann, Arndt R; Goller, Andreas H; Schneider, Gisbert; Husch, Tamara; Schutter, Christoph; Balducci, Andrea; Korth, Martin; Ntie-Kang, Fidele; Gunther, Stefan; Sippl, Wolfgang; Mbaze, Luc Meva'a