Search

Purpose: Ireland's Sláintecare health plan is placing an increased focus on primary care. A community oncology nursing programme was developed to train community nurses to deliver care in the community. While the initial pilot was proven to be clinically safe, no cost evaluation was carried out. This study aims to compare the costs of providing cancer support services in a day-ward versus in the community. Methods: 183 interventions (40 in day-ward and 143 in community) were timed and costed using healthcare professional salaries and the Human Capital method. Results: From the healthcare provider perspective, the day-ward was a significantly cheaper option by an average of €17.13 (95% CI €13.72 - €20.54, p

Purpose Cancer patients are a particularly vulnerable population group, facing an increase in physical, mental, logistical and financial difficulties. This, as well as Ireland's increased focus on primary care with the Slaintecare health plan, led to the development of the Community Oncology Nursing Programme, where community nurses are trained to provide cancer care in the community. This paper sought to explore the lived experiences of the patients and nurses involved in this programme in order to examine its impact as well as determine facilitators and roadblocks for future development. Methods A qualitative examination of the service was carried out by interviewing cancer patients receiving care as part of the programme as well as the nurses delivering care, both in the community and hospital day-ward. Thematic analysis was used. Results Themes of improved patient experience, nurse-patient relationship, the importance of location and roadblocks to further implementation of the programme emerged. There was a universal belief that the programme offered benefits to the patient and improved their care in some manner. Conclusions The Community Oncology Nursing Programme has been well received by both nurses and patients. The service provided by community nurses as part of this programme offers benefits to patients and an improved cancer service.

Background and Objective The inhibition of fatty acid amide hydrolase 1 (FAAH) has been proposed as a novel mechanism for treating pain syndromes by increasing the levels of endogenous cannabinoids (ECs). This study describes the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of V158866, a reversible FAAH inhibitor, after first administration to man. Methods 51 healthy male subjects were recruited into this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, adaptive dose, phase I single (Part A) and repeated ascending dose (Part B) study. The primary outcome was the safety and tolerability of V158866. Secondary outcomes were (1) pharmacokinetics of V158866 and (2) pharmacodynamics of V158866, as assessed by changes in plasma EC concentrations. Results Single oral doses of 5–300 mg and repeated oral doses of 50–500 mg were evaluated. V158866 was well tolerated, with no apparent treatment-related effects on laboratory variables. V158866 was rapidly absorbed with a mean terminal elimination half-life of 9.6–18.3 h (Day 7; Part B). V158866 reached steady state within 2–3 days of administration, with an accumulation ratio, based on AUC0–24h, of approximately 2 on Day 7. V158866 showed a linear relationship between dose and AUC across the entire dose range. V158866 caused reversible, dose-related increases in plasma ECs. At hemi-equilibrium, there was a sigmoidal maximum effect relationship between plasma V158866 concentrations and changes in plasma ECs. Conclusions V158866 is well tolerated, with linear pharmacokinetics suitable for once-daily administration, and reversible effects on plasma ECs. Maximum increases in plasma ECs occur with V158866 doses of 300–500 mg/day. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40268-016-0127-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.