1. Pharmacy Stakeholder Reports on Ethical and Logistical Considerations in Anti-Opioid Vaccine Development
- Author
-
Amy Stewart, Grace S. Chung, Cody J. Wenthur, and Vincent M. Wartenweiler
- Subjects
Agreeableness ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Health (social science) ,Psychological intervention ,Pharmacy ,Drug development ,Opioid ,Logistics ,Morals ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Stakeholder ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Ethics ,lcsh:R723-726 ,business.industry ,Health Policy ,Opioid use disorder ,Focus Groups ,Opioid-Related Disorders ,medicine.disease ,Focus group ,Analgesics, Opioid ,Issues, ethics and legal aspects ,Content analysis ,Philosophy of medicine ,Family medicine ,business ,Psychology ,lcsh:Medical philosophy. Medical ethics ,Vaccine ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Research Article - Abstract
Background As opioid use disorder (OUD) incidence and its associated deaths continue to persist at elevated rates, the development of novel treatment modalities is warranted. Recent strides in this therapeutic area include novel anti-opioid vaccine approaches. This work compares logistical and ethical considerations surrounding currently available interventions for opioid use disorder with an anti-opioid vaccine approach. Methods The opinions of student pharmacists and practicing pharmacists assessing knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes toward current and future OUD management strategies were characterized using a staged, multi-modal research approach incorporating a focus group, pilot survey development and refinement, and final survey deployment. Survey responses were assessed using one- and two-way parametric and non-parametric analyses where appropriate, and multi-dimensional matrix profiles were compared using z-tests following an exhaustive combinatorial sum of differences calculation between items within each compared matrix. Results Focus group content analysis revealed a high level of agreeableness among participants regarding anti-opioid vaccine technology and a sense of shared ownership regarding solutions to the opioid epidemic at large. Pilot survey results demonstrated subject ability to consider both pragmatic and ethical considerations related to current therapeutics and novel interventions in a single instrument, with high endurance amongst engaged subjects. Access inequality was the most concerning ethical consideration identified for anti-opioid vaccines. Support for anti-opioid vaccine implementation across various clinical scenarios was strongest for voluntary use amongst individuals in recovery, and lowest for mandatory use in at-risk individuals. Conclusions Ethical and logistical concerns surrounding anti-opioid vaccines were largely similar to those for current OUD therapeutics overall. Anti-opioid vaccines were endorsed as helpful potential additions to current OUD therapeutic approaches, particularly for voluntary use in the later stages of clinical progression.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF