Search

SERRATE/ARS2 is a conserved RNA effector protein involved in transcription, processing and export of different types of RNAs. In Arabidopsis, the best-studied function of SERRATE (SE) is to promote miRNA processing. Here, we report that SE interacts with the Nuclear Exosome Targeting (NEXT) complex, comprising the RNA helicase HEN2, the RNA binding protein RBM7 and one of the two zinc-knuckle proteins ZCCHC8A/ZCCHC8B. The identification of common targets of SE and HEN2 by RNA-seq supports the idea that SE cooperates with NEXT for RNA surveillance by the nuclear exosome. Among the RNA targets accumulating in absence of SE or NEXT are miRNA precursors. Loss of NEXT components results in the accumulation of pri-miRNAs without affecting levels of miRNAs, indicating that NEXT is, unlike SE, not required for miRNA processing. As compared to se-2, se-2 hen2-2 double mutants showed increased accumulation of pri-miRNAs, but partially restored levels of mature miRNAs and attenuated developmental defects. We propose that the slow degradation of pri-miRNAs caused by loss of HEN2 compensates for the poor miRNA processing efficiency in se-2 mutants, and that SE regulates miRNA biogenesis through its double contribution in promoting miRNA processing but also pri-miRNA degradation through the recruitment of the NEXT complex.

In eukaryotes, general mRNA decay requires the decapping complex. The activity of this complex depends on its catalytic subunit, DCP2 and its interaction with decapping enhancers, including its main partner DCP1. Here, we report that in Arabidopsis, DCP1 also interacts with a NYN domain endoribonuclease, hence named DCP1-ASSOCIATED NYN ENDORIBONUCLEASE 1 (DNE1). Interestingly, we find DNE1 predominantly associated with DCP1 but not with DCP2 and reciprocally, suggesting the existence of two distinct protein complexes. We also show that the catalytic residues of DNE1 are required to repress the expression of mRNAs in planta upon transient expression. The overexpression of DNE1 in transgenic lines leads to growth defects and transcriptomic changes related to the one observed upon inactivation of the decapping complex. Finally, the combination of dne1 and dcp2 mutations, revealed a functional redundancy between DNE1 and DCP2 in controlling phyllotactic pattern formation in Arabidopsis. Our work identifies DNE1, a hitherto unknown DCP1 protein partner highly conserved in the plant kingdom and identifies its importance for developmental robustness.One-sentence summaryDNE1, a NYN domain protein interacts with the decapping activator DCP1 and, together with DCP2, specify phyllotactic patterns in Arabidopsis.

The RNA exosome is a key 3’−5’ exoribonuclease with an evolutionarily conserved structure and function. Its cytosolic functions require the co-factors SKI7 and the Ski complex. Here we demonstrate by co-purification experiments that the ARM-repeat protein RESURRECTION1 (RST1) and RST1 INTERACTING PROTEIN (RIPR) connect the cytosolic Arabidopsis RNA exosome to the Ski complex. rst1 and ripr mutants accumulate RNA quality control siRNAs (rqc-siRNAs) produced by the post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) machinery when mRNA degradation is compromised. The small RNA populations observed in rst1 and ripr mutants are also detected in mutants lacking the RRP45B/CER7 core exosome subunit. Thus, molecular and genetic evidence supports a physical and functional link between RST1, RIPR and the RNA exosome. Our data reveal the existence of additional cytosolic exosome co-factors besides the known Ski subunits. RST1 is not restricted to plants, as homologues with a similar domain architecture but unknown function exist in animals, including humans., Cytosolic RNA degradation by the RNA exosome requires the Ski complex. Here the authors show that the proteins RST1 and RIPR assist the RNA exosome and the Ski complex in RNA degradation, thereby preventing the production of secondary siRNAs from endogenous mRNAs.

Uridylation is a widespread modification destabilizing eukaryotic mRNAs. Yet, molecular mechanisms underlying TUTase-mediated mRNA degradation remain mostly unresolved. Here, we report that the Arabidopsis TUTase URT1 participates in a molecular network connecting several translational repressors/decapping activators. URT1 directly interacts with DECAPPING 5 (DCP5), the Arabidopsis ortholog of human LSM14 and yeast Scd6, and this interaction connects URT1 to additional decay factors like DDX6/Dhh1-like RNA helicases. Nanopore direct RNA sequencing reveals a global role of URT1 in shaping poly(A) tail length, notably by preventing the accumulation of excessively deadenylated mRNAs. Based on in vitro and in planta data, we propose a model that explains how URT1 could reduce the accumulation of oligo(A)-tailed mRNAs both by favoring their degradation and because 3’ terminal uridines intrinsically hinder deadenylation. Importantly, preventing the accumulation of excessively deadenylated mRNAs avoids the biogenesis of illegitimate siRNAs that silence endogenous mRNAs and perturb Arabidopsis growth and development., TUTase mediated uridylation of mRNA promotes degradation. Here, Scheer, de Almeida et al. show that Arabidopsis TUTase URT1 interacts directly with the translation inhibitor and decay factor DECAPPING5 and suppresses siRNA biogenesis by preventing accumulation of deadenylated mRNAs

International audience; The main 3'-5' exoribonucleolytic activity of eukaryotic cells is provided by the RNA exosome. The exosome is constituted by a core complex of nine subunits (Exo9), which coordinates the recruitment and the activities of distinct types of cofactors. The RNA exosome cofactors confer distributive and processive 3'-5' exoribonucleolytic, endoribonucleolytic, and RNA helicase activities. In addition, several RNA binding proteins and terminal nucleotidyltransferases also participate in the recognition of exosome RNA substrates.To fully understand the biological roles of the exosome, the respective functions of its cofactors must be deciphered. This entails the high-resolution analysis of 3' extremities of degradation or processing intermediates in different mutant backgrounds or growth conditions. Here, we describe a detailed 3' RACE-seq procedure for targeted mapping of exosome substrate 3' ends. This procedure combines a 3' RACE protocol with Illumina sequencing to enable the high-resolution mapping of 3' extremities and the identification of untemplated nucleotides for selected RNA targets.

Groundbreaking discoveries have uncovered the widespread post-transcriptional modifications of all classes of RNA. These studies have led to the emerging notion of an 'epitranscriptome' as a new layer of gene regulation. Diverse modifications control RNA fate, including the 3' addition of untemplated nucleotides or 3' tailing. The most exciting recent discoveries in 3' tailing are related to uridylation. Uridylation targets various noncoding RNAs, from small RNAs and their precursors to rRNAs, and U tails mostly regulate processing or degradation. Interestingly, uridylation is also a pervasive modification of mRNAs. In this review, we discuss how the addition of few uridines to the 3' end of mRNAs influences mRNA decay. We also consider recent findings that reveal other consequences of uridylation on mRNA fate.

RNA uridylation consists of the untemplated addition of uridines at the 3′ extremity of an RNA molecule. RNA uridylation is catalysed by terminal uridylyltransferases (TUTases), which form a subgroup of the terminal nucleotidyltransferase family, to which poly(A) polymerases also belong. The key role of RNA uridylation is to regulate RNA degradation in a variety of eukaryotes, including fission yeast, plants and animals. In plants, RNA uridylation has been mostly studied in two model species, the green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant TUTases target a variety of RNA substrates, differing in size and function. These RNA substrates include microRNAs (miRNAs), small interfering silencing RNAs (siRNAs), ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and mRNA fragments generated during post-transcriptional gene silencing. Viral RNAs can also get uridylated during plant infection. We describe here the evolutionary history of plant TUTases and we summarize the diverse molecular functions of uridylation during RNA degradation processes in plants. We also outline key points of future research. This article is part of the theme issue ‘5′ and 3′ modifications controlling RNA degradation’.

International audience; The RNA helicase UP-FRAMESHIFT (UPF1) is a key factor of nonsense-mediated decay (NMD), a mRNA decay pathway involved in RNA quality control and in the fine-tuning of gene expression. UPF1 recruits UPF2 and UPF3 to constitute the NMD core complex, which is conserved across eukaryotes. No other components of UPF1-containing ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) are known in plants, despite its key role in regulating gene expression. Here, we report the identification of a large set of proteins that co-purify with the Arabidopsis UPF1, either in an RNA-dependent or RNA-independent manner. We found that like UPF1, several of its co-purifying proteins have a dual localization in the cytosol and in P-bodies, which are dynamic structures formed by the condensation of translationally repressed mRNPs. Interestingly, more than half of the proteins of the UPF1 interactome also co-purify with DCP5, a conserved translation repressor also involved in P-body formation. We identified a terminal nucleotidyltransferase, ribonucleases and several RNA helicases among the most significantly enriched proteins co-purifying with both UPF1 and DCP5. Among these, RNA helicases are the homologs of DDX6/Dhh1, known as translation repressors in humans and yeast, respectively. Overall, this study reports a large set of proteins associated with the Arabidopsis UPF1 and DCP5, two components of P-bodies, and reveals an extensive interaction network between RNA degradation and translation repression factors. Using this resource, we identified five hitherto unknown components of P-bodies in plants, pointing out the value of this dataset for the identification of proteins potentially involved in translation repression and/or RNA degradation.

RNA uridylation is a potent and widespread posttranscriptional regulator of gene expression. RNA uridylation has been detected in a range of eukaryotes including trypanosomes, animals, plants, and fungi, but with the noticeable exception of budding yeast. Virtually all classes of eukaryotic RNAs can be uridylated and uridylation can also tag viral RNAs. The untemplated addition of a few uridines at the 3' end of a transcript can have a decisive impact on RNA's fate. In rare instances, uridylation is an intrinsic step in the maturation of noncoding RNAs like for the U6 spliceosomal RNA or mitochondrial guide RNAs in trypanosomes. Uridylation can also switch specific miRNA precursors from a degradative to a processing mode. This switch depends on the number of uridines added which is regulated by the cellular context. Yet, the typical consequence of uridylation on mature noncoding RNAs or their precursors is to accelerate decay. Importantly, mRNAs are also tagged by uridylation. In fact, the advent of novel high throughput sequencing protocols has recently revealed the pervasiveness of mRNA uridylation, from plants to humans. As for noncoding RNAs, the main function to date for mRNA uridylation is to promote degradation. Yet, additional roles begin to be ascribed to U-tailing such as the control of mRNA deadenylation, translation control and possibly storage. All these new findings illustrate that we are just beginning to appreciate the diversity of roles played by RNA uridylation and its full temporal and spatial implication in regulating gene expression. WIREs RNA 2018, 9:e1440. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1440 This article is categorized under: RNA Processing > 3' End Processing RNA Processing > RNA Editing and Modification RNA Turnover and Surveillance > Turnover/Surveillance Mechanisms.

Correct gene expression requires tight RNA quality control both at transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. Using a splicing-defective allele of PASTICCINO2 (PAS2), a gene essential for plant development, we isolated suppressor mutations modifying pas2-1 mRNA profiles and restoring wild-type growth. Three suppressor of pas2 (sop) mutations modified the degradation of mis-spliced pas2-1 mRNA species, allowing the synthesis of a functional protein. Cloning of the suppressor mutations identified the core subunit of the exosome SOP2/RRP4, the exosome nucleoplasmic cofactor SOP3/HEN2 and a novel zinc-finger protein SOP1 that colocalizes with HEN2 in nucleoplasmic foci. The three SOP proteins counteract post-transcriptional (trans)gene silencing (PTGS), which suggests that they all act in RNA quality control. In addition, sop1 mutants accumulate some, but not all of the misprocessed mRNAs and other types of RNAs that are observed in exosome mutants. Taken together, our data show that SOP1 is a new component of nuclear RNA surveillance that is required for the degradation of a specific subset of nuclear exosome targets., Author Summary Cells use various RNA quality control mechanisms to monitore the correct expression of their genome. Indeed, gene transcription can often generate faulty transcripts that are rapidly degraded to avoid possible deleterious effects to the cell. RNA degradation by the exosome is the main pathway for the removal of unwanted RNA in all kingdoms. Recognition of aberrant RNA involves a number of RNA binding proteins and other factors that target them for degradation by the exosome. Here, we used a genetic approach to identify proteins involved in the degradation of a mis-spliced RNA by the nuclear exosome in plants. Our screen identified two known components of nuclear RNA degradation pathway, namely the exosome core subunit RRP4 and the exosome-associated RNA helicase HEN2 that is required for the elimination of non-ribosomal RNAs by the nuclear exosome. Furthermore, we identified SOP1 as a novel putative exosome cofactor that is required for the degradation of some, but not all, of the substrates of HEN2.

Summary Uridylation emerges as a key modification promoting mRNA degradation in eukaryotes. In addition, uridylation by URT1 prevents the accumulation of excessively deadenylated mRNAs in Arabidopsis . Here, we show that the extent of mRNA deadenylation is controlled by URT1. By using TAIL-seq analysis, we demonstrate the prevalence of mRNA uridylation and the existence, at lower frequencies, of mRNA cytidylation and guanylation in Arabidopsis . Both URT1-dependent and URT1-independent types of uridylation co-exist but only URT1-mediated uridylation prevents the accumulation of excessively deadenylated mRNAs. Importantly, uridylation repairs deadenylated extremities to restore the size distribution observed for non-uridylated oligo(A) tails. In vivo and in vitro data indicate that Poly(A) Binding Protein (PABP) binds to uridylated oligo(A) tails and determines the length of U-extensions added by URT1. Taken together, our results uncover a role for uridylation and PABP in repairing mRNA deadenylated ends and reveal that uridylation plays diverse roles in eukaryotic mRNA metabolism.

RNA degradation is a key process in the regulation of gene expression. In all organisms, RNA degradation participates in controlling coding and non-coding RNA levels in response to developmental and environmental cues. RNA degradation is also crucial for the elimination of defective RNAs. Those defective RNAs are mostly produced by ‘mistakes’ made by the RNA processing machinery during the maturation of functional transcripts from their precursors. The constant control of RNA quality prevents potential deleterious effects caused by the accumulation of aberrant non-coding transcripts or by the translation of defective messenger RNAs (mRNAs). Prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms are also under the constant threat of attacks from pathogens, mostly viruses, and one common line of defence involves the ribonucleolytic digestion of the invader's RNA. Finally, mutations in components involved in RNA degradation are associated with numerous diseases in humans, and this together with the multiplicity of its roles illustrates the biological importance of RNA degradation. RNA degradation is mostly viewed as a default pathway: any functional RNA (including a successful pathogenic RNA) must be protected from the scavenging RNA degradation machinery. Yet, this protection must be temporary, and it will be overcome at one point because the ultimate fate of any cellular RNA is to be eliminated. This special issue focuses on modifications deposited at the 5′ or the 3′ extremities of RNA, and how these modifications control RNA stability or degradation. This article is part of the theme issue ‘5′ and 3′ modifications controlling RNA degradation’.

Mitochondria arose from the endosymbiosis of a bacterium related to contemporary members of Alphaproteobacteria (2). Despite a probable monophylogenetic origin and the conservation of most of the biological roles of mitochondria, mitochondrial (mt) genome organization and expression are extraordinarily diverse among eucaryotes. As exemplified in animals and higher plants, mt genome size can vary from 16 kbp to several hundreds of kilobase pairs, respectively. This large increase in plant mt genome size is not correlated with increasing coding capacity but is rather explained by the presence of large intergenic regions, which are virtually absent from animal mt genomes. Plant mt genomes also contain insertions of nuclear and plastid sequences as well as foreign DNA from viral and unknown origins. As a consequence of the diversity in genome organization, mechanisms controlling mt gene expression also differ markedly between organisms. Transcription of the human mt genome is a relatively straightforward process, as both strands are transcribed from single promoters lying in the noncoding regulatory region. By contrast, numerous promoters are scattered along both strands of plant mt genomes. Moreover, even multiple promoters for a single gene are a common feature in plant mitochondria (11, 14). The recent analysis of these promoter sequences in Arabidopsis thaliana also revealed a somehow relaxed promoter specificity, as multiple sequences are able to initiate transcription (11). In addition, there is so far no evidence for a transcription termination mechanism in plant mitochondria. For instance, large regions downstream of rrn genes are expressed, although they do not give rise to stable transcripts (4). The emerging picture is that transcription in plant mitochondria is a relaxed process which, in general, exhibits little control or modulation. Rather, posttranscriptional events such as processing and control of RNA stability account for proper control of gene expression in plant mitochondria (4, 7, 13). Exoribonucleases are major players in RNA 3′ processing and degradation processes. We have recently characterized an A. thaliana nuclear gene (At5g14580) that encodes a mitochondrial exoribonuclease belonging to the polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) family (17). The mt PNPase is essential for viability in Arabidopsis, in contrast to the chloroplast PNPase-like protein encoded by the At3g03710 gene. Down-regulation of the mt PNPase results in the accumulation of unprocessed RNAs, such as atp9 and orfB mRNA and 18S rRNA precursors (16, 17). Moreover, RNA species that are quickly turned over in wild-type (WT) plants accumulate in the absence of PNPase. Such RNAs include, for instance, 18S rRNA degradation intermediates and the leader of the 18S rRNA, which is removed by an endonuclease from the primary transcript. These initial studies revealed that PNPase is essential for several aspects of mt RNA metabolism, including 3′ processing and degradation processes. Interestingly, all RNA substrates of PNPase that we have investigated so far are polyadenylated. Although mature RNAs are not constitutively polyadenylated in plant mitochondria, poly(A) tails trigger rapid exonucleolytic degradation by PNPase, similar to the situation reported first for Escherichia coli and later for chloroplasts (1, 3). To determine new substrates, and thus novel biological roles, of PNPase, we cloned about 300 polyadenylated mt RNAs from plants down-regulated for PNPase (PNP− plants). These sequences were considered degradation tags, as they allowed the identification of different classes of transcripts requiring PNPase for their degradation as judged by their accumulation in PNP− versus WT plants. Our results indicate that maturation by-products such as rRNA leaders or tRNA intergenic sequences are generally degraded by PNPase. In addition, we show that a major role for PNPase is the degradation of transcripts that are, in some cases, expressed to surprisingly high levels from regions lacking known genes. Some of these RNAs, which include transcripts of chimeric open reading frames (ORFs) created by mt DNA recombination events or antisense (AS) RNA transcribed from the opposite DNA strand of a known gene, could have a deleterious effect on mitochondrial function. These data show that the lack of tight transcriptional control in Arabidopsis mitochondria is counterbalanced by polyadenylation-mediated decay by PNPase.

Degradation of mRNAs is usually initiated by deadenylation, the shortening of long poly(A) tails to oligo(A) tails of 12-15 As. Deadenylation leads to decapping and to subsequent 5' to 3' degradation by XRN proteins, or alternatively 3' to 5' degradation by the exosome. Decapping can also be induced by uridylation as shown for the non-polyadenylated histone mRNAs in humans and for several mRNAs in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Aspergillus nidulans. Here we report a novel role for uridylation in preventing 3' trimming of oligoadenylated mRNAs in Arabidopsis. We show that oligo(A)-tailed mRNAs are uridylated by the cytosolic UTP:RNA uridylyltransferase URT1 and that URT1 has no major impact on mRNA degradation rates. However, in absence of uridylation, oligo(A) tails are trimmed, indicating that uridylation protects oligoadenylated mRNAs from 3' ribonucleolytic attacks. This conclusion is further supported by an increase in 3' truncated transcripts detected in urt1 mutants. We propose that preventing 3' trimming of oligo(A)-tailed mRNAs by uridylation participates in establishing the 5' to 3' directionality of mRNA degradation. Importantly, uridylation prevents 3' shortening of mRNAs associated with polysomes, suggesting that a key biological function of uridylation is to confer 5' to 3' polarity in case of co-translational mRNA decay.

Polyadenylation is a multifunctional post-transcriptional modification that is best known for stabilizing eukaryotic mRNAs and promoting their translation. However, the primordial role of polyadenylation is to target RNAs for degradation by 3' to 5' exoribonucleases. Polyadenylation-assisted RNA degradation contributes to post-transcriptional control in the three genetic compartments of a plant cell: the nucleus, the chloroplast and the mitochondrion. Here, we review the current knowledge of this RNA degradation pathway in these compartments, highlighting recent results that emphasize the crucial role of polyadenylation-assisted RNA degradation in plant genome expression. We also discuss other possible roles of polyadenylation and its sister process polyuridylation.

Yeast Rrp6p and its human counterpart, PM/Scl100, are exosome-associated proteins involved in the degradation of aberrant transcripts and processing of precursors to stable RNAs, such as the 5.8S rRNA, snRNAs, and snoRNAs. The activity of yeast Rrp6p is stimulated by the polyadenylation of its RNA substrates. We identified three RRP6-like proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana: AtRRP6L3 is restricted to the cytoplasm, whereas AtRRP6L1 and -2 have different intranuclear localizations. Both nuclear RRP6L proteins are functional, since AtRRP6L1 complements the temperature-sensitive phenotype of a yeast rrp6Delta strain and mutation of AtRRP6L2 leads to accumulation of an rRNA maturation by-product. This by-product corresponds to the excised 5' part of the 18S-5.8S-25S rRNA precursor and accumulates as a polyadenylated transcript, suggesting that RRP6L2 is involved in poly(A)-mediated RNA degradation in plant nuclei. Interestingly, the rRNA maturation by-product is a substrate of AtRRP6L2 but not of AtRRP6L1. This result and the distinctive subcellular distribution of AtRRP6L1 to -3 indicate a specialization of RRP6-like proteins in Arabidopsis.

Plant mitochondria are particularly prone to the production of both defective and cryptic transcripts as a result of the complex organisation and mode of expression of their genome. Cryptic transcripts are generated from intergenic regions due to a relaxed control of transcription. Certain intergenic regions are transcribed at higher rates than genuine genes and therefore, cryptic transcripts are abundantly produced in plant mitochondria. In addition, primary transcripts from genuine genes must go through complex post-transcriptional processes such as C to U editing and cis or trans splicing of group II introns. These post-transcriptional processes are rather inefficient and as a result, defective transcripts are constantly produced in plant mitochondria. In this review, we will describe the nature of cryptic and defective transcripts as well as their fate in plant mitochondria. Although RNA surveillance is crucial to establishing the final transcriptome by degrading cryptic transcripts, plant mitochondria are able to tolerate a surprising high level of defective transcripts.