1. Long-term treatment costs and cost-effectiveness of restoration repair versus replacement
- Author
-
Philipp Kanzow, Falk Schwendicke, Annette Wiegand, and Joachim Krois
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Materials science ,Long term treatment ,Wilcoxon signed-rank test ,Cost effectiveness ,Cost-Benefit Analysis ,02 engineering and technology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,General Materials Science ,Dental Restoration Failure ,Major complication ,Dental Restoration, Permanent ,Treatment costs ,General Dentistry ,health care economics and organizations ,Retrospective Studies ,Permanent teeth ,Health Care Costs ,030206 dentistry ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,University hospital ,Molar ,Surgery ,Mechanics of Materials ,Censoring (clinical trials) ,0210 nano-technology - Abstract
Objectives When managing partially defective restorations, dentists can choose between repair and replacement. We aimed to assess the long-term treatment costs of repairs and replacements. Methods Partially defective anterior and posterior composite restorations in permanent teeth had been repaired or replaced in a German university hospital and were retrospectively followed until censoring or one of the following events: (1) Extraction, (2) Major complications including placement of indirect restorations, endodontic treatments and extractions, or (3) Any complications including major complications and further direct restorations. Costs were estimated from a German mixed public-private-payer perspective. Cost-effectiveness differences were described using median-based incremental-cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERMEDIAN). Statistical analysis was performed using generalized linear mixed modeling (GLM), Chi2-test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test (p Results A total of 616 repairs in 468 patients (follow-up: 4.9 ± 4.1 years) and 264 replacements in 218 patients (follow-up: 4.8 ± 4.3) were included. While replacements were associated with higher initial treatment costs, median annualized treatment costs did not significantly differ between repair (47.58 Euro [IQR: 24.41–107.04]) and replacement (50.64 Euro [IQR: 26.30–118.78]; p > 0.05), but were higher for molars (75.53 Euro [IQR: 24.41–92.18]) than incisors (45.03 Euro [IQR: 28.19–168.50]; p = 0.011). The difference in the % of extractions, major and any complications were minimal between both groups. The mean ICERMEDIAN of replacement vs. repair was -146.8 Euro/% when extractions were considered as outcomes. Regarding major and any complications, mean ICERMEDIAN amounted to 67.6 Euro/% and 23.9 Euro/%, respectively. Significance Repairs and replacements of partially defective restorations showed similar long-term costs and cost-effectiveness.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF