Search

Seismic capacity assessment of existing buildings is of paramount importance for mitigating the seismic risk in earthquake-prone areas. In Europe, the next version of Eurocode 8 and the current version of the Italian standards suggest the adoption of both linear and nonlinear approaches to perform seismic analyses of existing masonry buildings. This paper discusses with the main issues concerning linear and nonlinear analyses methodologies provided by the Italian standards for existing unreinforced masonry buildings. An historical building located in Southern Italy, representative of the Mediterranean basin buildings, has been chosen as a case study and modelled through the equivalent frame model. According to the Italian standards, the influence of in-plane stiffness of floors and spandrels on the overall seismic capacity of the structure has been considered in the analyses. Beyond the code prescriptions, the effect of different ultimate drifts values assumed for the spandrels on nonlinear behavior of the structure has been analysed. The results of two types of linear analyses (lateral static force method and modal response spectrum analysis) have been compared among them and with those provided by the nonlinear static method. Conclusions show that either behavior and overstrength factors provided by the Italian standards are conservative than those estimated through the nonlinear static analyses. Moreover, it has been remarked that the value of ultimate drift adopted for the spandrel can affect significantly the nonlinear response of the structures, although this topic still represents an open issue.

This paper presents a benchmark exercise for the seismic assessment of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings as a follow-up of a blind prediction test organized in the context of the European Conference of Earthquake Engineering Series. The blind prediction exercise was aimed at better defining the open issues in current procedures for modeling and performing seismic analysis of URM buildings, by highlighting the uncertainty that can influence the results. This work presents an overview of the approaches used by different research teams and the scope of predictions. The benchmark structure was a three-story building with traditional European architecture from which two Cases were considered: A) stone masonry walls and flexible horizontal diaphragms and B) brick masonry walls and rigid horizontal diaphragms. A wide range of approaches was used by the participating teams concerning modeling strategies, methods of analysis and criteria for the attainment of limit states, which are here addressed as potential sources for the dispersion of predictions. The results were compared in terms of capacity curves, predicted failure mechanisms compatible with the fulfillment of limit states of near collapse and damage limitation, and related minimum values of peak ground acceleration (PGA). The results show an overall good agreement for damage patterns and collapse mechanisms in both benchmark structures, presenting some differences in the type of failure mode and its extent. However, the scatter of predicted capacity curves and critical PGAs is very high, especially for the Case with brick masonry and rigid diaphragms, indicating that clearer procedures in the building codes are required for professionals., This work was partly financed by FCT/MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC) under the R&D Unit Institute for Sustainability and Innovation in Structural Engineering (ISISE), under reference UIDB/04029/2020.

This paper investigates the potentials of inter-story isolation systems (IIS) for retrofitting irregular masonry buildings by means of an isolated vertical addition realised on the roof of the existing structure. By assuming a case study, a wide parametric analysis is firstly carried out on lumped-masses model for identifying the dynamic properties of the isolated superstructure that minimizes the global seismic response. Hence, a 3D FE model is adopted for the detailed design and analysis of the IIS structure, with different solutions, in order to regularize the global seismic response of the IIS complex. Finally, some general design criteria are suggested.

Modeling of masonry buildings subjected to seismic actions still represents an open problem in structural engineering. The equivalent frame model is the most used approach to analyze the seismic behavior of both existing and new masonry constructions but, despite this, several aspects are being researched to improve its effectiveness. Among these, modeling of spandrel panels plays a key role to correctly analyze the in-plane seismic response of unreinforced masonry walls. Actually, horizontal mono-dimensional beam-like elements provided of both strength and displacement capacity are used to schematize the spandrel panels, also according with the most of current national and international codes. In this paper an alternative strut and tie scheme to model the spandrel panels, suitable to be used within the equivalent frame approach, is presented: the compressed masonry material is schematized with an equivalent diagonal no-tension truss, whose length and effective compressed area are obtained with limit equilibrium conditions, while tensile-resistant element is represented by no-compression truss. Such model allows a more realistic representation of the mechanical behavior of spandrels because both amount of axial force within the spandrel and the reduced elastic flexural and shear stiffness due to progressive cracking of material are taken into account. Moreover, the local failures of both compressed masonry and/or tensile-resistant elements are better identified and, consequently, also the failure mechanisms of the whole equivalent frame are better detailed. The proposed schematization has been used to simulate the seismic behavior of some reference case studies of existing masonry walls, strengthened with different steel ties arrangement. These walls have been modelled with a hybrid equivalent frame model which consists of mono-dimensional beam-like element for piers, fully rigid offsets for the nodal panels and a strut and tie scheme for spandrels.

This paper deals with the experimental monotonic and cyclic behavior of masonry spandrels reinforced with Fiber Reinforced Polymers (FRP). The research is a part of a wider program, started by the authors in the last decade, regarding the analysis of the seismic behavior of masonry spandrels in historical buildings of the Mediterranean area. The paper summarizes the properties of the test units, the test set-up and the results of the experimental monotonic and cyclic behavior conducted on twenty-four scaled down H-shaped spandrels made with homogeneous material (e.g. mortar with low tensile strength). Both unreinforced and FRP-reinforced specimens with three different slenderness ratios – e.g. slender, intermediate and squat – and three different arrangements of FRP laminates have been considered for the tests. The main objective has been to verify the possibility of preventing brittle failure modes, typical of spandrels subjected to in-plane seismic actions (e.g. diagonal cracking), and of increasing their strength by applying specific reinforcement systems, so encouraging more ductile behavior characterized by toe-crushing at the ends of the spandrels itself.

In-plane seismic behaviour of Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) walls is influenced by panel-to-panel and panel-to-foundation mechanical connections, which consist of hold-downs and angle brackets. Due to the platform constructional technology, the orthogonal to grain timber-to-timber contact is also involved in the seismic response of the panels. To date, literature theoretical approaches to evaluating the flexural load-bearing capacity of CLT panels focus their attention on the schematization of hold-downs and angle brackets only, under evaluating the role of timber compressed in the perpendicular direction. In this paper the influence of orthogonal to grain timber properties on the overall seismic behaviour of CLT walls has been investigated, proposing a general theoretical model to schematize the panel-to-panel and panel-to-foundation connections. A parabola-rectangle constitutive behaviour has been defined to describe the orthogonal to grain timber behaviour in the connection zones, while hold-downs and angle brackets are modelled adopting literature models. Five different failure conditions, described by mathematical formulations, able to describe the entire axial force-bending moment interaction domain have been defined. The proposed model has also been employed to schematize the connection zones in multi-storey CLT walls with openings, allowing to investigate the effect of the orthogonal to grain properties on its seismic behaviour. Results of nonlinear analyses demonstrate a significant influence of orthogonal to grain timber properties on seismic behaviour of the walls, affecting their strength, stiffness, ductility and collapse mechanisms.

This paper deals with the influence of the rolling shear deformation on the flexural behavior of CLT (Cross-Laminated Timber) panels. The morphological configuration of the panels, which consist of orthogonal overlapped layers of boards, led to a particular shear behavior when subjected to out-of-plane loadings: the low value of the shear modulus in orthogonal to grain direction (i.e., rolling shear modulus) gives rise to significant shear deformations in the transverse layers of boards, whose grains direction is perpendicular with respect to the tangential stresses direction. This produces increases of deflections and vibrations under service loads, creating discomfort for the users. Different analytical methods accounting for this phenomenon have been already developed and presented in literature. Comparative analyses among the results provided by some of these methods have been carried out in the present paper and the influence of the rolling shear deformations, with reference to different span-to-depth (L/H) ratios investigated. Moreover, the analytical results have also been compared with those obtained by more accurate 2D finite element models. The results show that, at the service limit states, the influence of the rolling shear can be significant when the aspect ratios became less than L/H = 30, and the phenomenon must be accurately considered in both deflection and stress analysis of CLT floors. Contrariwise, in the case of higher aspect ratios (slender panels), the deflections and stresses can be evaluated neglecting the rolling shear influence, assuming the layers of boards as fully-connected.

The interest of the scientific community for the seismic behaviour of existing masonry buildings has largely increased in recent years, due to the fact that the seismic events have evidenced a great need of rehabilitation. Masonry structures, and especially low rise buildings, are in fact the most diffused all over the world and in particular in seismic areas in developing countries because of their ease in construction and economy. Moreover unreinforced masonry is the most diffused construction material in the major part of historical centrers in Europe. In a well engineered and constructed masonry building subjected to earthquake forces, in which out of plane mechanisms can be avoided, the contribution of in-plane shear resistance of the masonry walls is a determinant factor for the stability of the whole structure. Based on this last consideration, this paper presents an approach for the analysis of masonry walls loaded with in-plane forces, involving a minimum energy procedure. The results of the numerical analyses presented are compared with those obtained by laboratory tests on brick masonry panels.