1. Comparison of the strip- and block-wise aerial triangulation using different exterior orientation parameters weights
- Author
-
Mohammad Bagherbandi, Arash Jouybari, and Faramarz Nilfouroushan
- Subjects
INS/GNSS Integration ,Atmospheric Science ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Orientation (computer vision) ,Geography, Planning and Development ,ComputingMethodologies_IMAGEPROCESSINGANDCOMPUTERVISION ,0211 other engineering and technologies ,Triangulation (social science) ,02 engineering and technology ,Direct georeferencing ,Multidisciplinär geovetenskap ,01 natural sciences ,General Energy ,Photogrammetry ,Lidar ,Geosciences, Multidisciplinary ,Digital surface ,Algorithm ,021101 geological & geomatics engineering ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Mobile mapping ,Mathematics ,Block (data storage) - Abstract
In this study, three different procedures: checkpoint RMS of residuals, statistical evaluation of AT results using t-test, and comparison of a photogrammetric digital surface model (DSM) and LiDAR data are used to analyse the effect of IMU and GNSS uncertainties on the final adjusted results. The outcome suggests that the method of block-wise GNSS shift correction is the better method for aerial triangulation and one should use appropriate observable weights in AT. The comparison of checkpoint RMS residuals between the two methods shows that the block-wise solution is on average 6cm more accurate than the strip-wise solution.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF