Search

For plants, elemental nutrients are important belowground resources that sustain growth and survival. To understand how tropical plant nutrient status responds to environmental variation, we asked whether concentrations of nutrients in root and leaf tissues track gradients in soil nutrient concentrations and if tissue nutrient concentrations respond independently or in concert to soil nutrient concentrations. We measured soil nutrient concentrations of rhizosphere soil and root and leaf tissue elemental concentrations of saplings from 14 Angiosperm families in montane tropical forest of Jianfengling, China. Using mixed-effects models, we modeled the nutrient concentration of plant tissues as a function of soil resources. Of fourteen elements measured, seven —nitrogen, boron, phosphorus, potassium, manganese, copper and zinc— increased in concentrations in root and leaf tissues with higher soil nutrient availability; two decreased —aluminum and carbon; three were invariant —magnesium, sulfur, and calcium; and two —sodium and iron— showed contrasting patterns between leaves and roots. Eight elements necessary to leaf physiological function, but also used in root functioning —nitrogen, boron, magnesium phosphorus, sulfur, potassium, calcium, manganese— were more concentrated in leaves than roots. Additionally, most elements showed tradeoffs in concentrations between roots and leaves. Plant lineage (i.e. family) explained very little of the variation about this overall trend. Overall, increases in tissue nutrient concentrations with soil fertility were subtle if present at all. Thus, we conclude that tissue nutrients of juvenile tropical trees have a high degree of elemental homeostasis with local-scale soil nutrient content in Jianfengling.

Legumes provide an essential service to ecosystems by capturing nitrogen from the atmosphere and delivering it to the soil, where it may then be available to other plants. However, this facilitation by legumes has not been widely studied in global tropical forests. Demographic data from 11 large forest plots (16–60 ha) ranging from 5.25° S to 29.25° N latitude show that within forests, leguminous trees have a larger effect on neighbor diversity than non-legumes. Where soil nitrogen is high, most legume species have higher neighbor diversity than non-legumes. Where soil nitrogen is low, most legumes have lower neighbor diversity than non-legumes. No facilitation effect on neighbor basal area was observed in either high or low soil N conditions. The legume–soil nitrogen positive feedback that promotes tree diversity has both theoretical implications for understanding species coexistence in diverse forests, and practical implications for the utilization of legumes in forest restoration., Xu et al. examine the effect of leguminous trees on neighbor diversity across 11 plots in tropical forests around the world, and find that in high soil nitrogen conditions, most legume species have higher neighbor diversity than non-legumes, and vice versa where soil nitrogen is low. Their results have practical implications for the utilization of legumes in forest restoration.

The tree growth and mortality trade-off is well documented and plays a key role in forests by forming the basis of many ecosystem processes and contributing to tree species coexistence. One area that requires further understanding is how the growth-mortality trade-off is influenced by biotic and abiotic interactions in the forest. In this study, we used a 5-year interval of tree growth and mortality demographic data from a 9-ha forest dynamics plot in a temperate old-growth Chinese forest to address two questions, (1) What is the nature of the growth-mortality trade-off among species in this forest? (2) Are there differences between the responses of tree growth and mortality to local neighborhood variables, both biotic and abiotic? Specifically, do these responses vary among species and with tree size? For the first question, we hypothesized that, within species, mortality rate would be negatively correlated with growth rate, whereas among species it would be positively correlated. For the second question, we expected biotic and abiotic factors to both be important for tree mortality; but expected biotic factors to be more important than abiotic factors for tree growth. The responses of tree growth and mortality to local neighborhood variables, both biotic and abiotic, varied among species. Abiotic factors were more important than biotic factors for small trees; biotic variables were stable with tree size for both small and large trees. Our results showed that there were differences between the responses of tree growth and mortality to local neighborhood variables (i.e., biotic and abiotic) in this temperate forest community. The responses of tree mortality to local neighborhood variables strongly varied across species. Abiotic factors were only important for the growth of small trees. Biotic factors were stable with tree size for growth of small and large trees, but not for mortality. Mortality was negatively correlated with growth for large trees within species; growth-mortality trade-off among species was found to be more accentuated for small trees. The responses of tree mortality to local neighborhood variables differed strongly across species, whereas the responses of tree growth to local neighborhood variables varied among size classes. Tree growth and mortality is tightly correlated both within (negatively) and among species (positively), and their relationships are both size dependent in this temperate forest. Our findings highlight that differential responses of tree growth and mortality to local neighborhood variables continue to shape the forest community well after sapling establishment in this temperate forest community.

The net primary productivity (NPP) of tropical forests is a key part of the global carbon cycle. Numerous studies have estimated tropical forest NPP, yet most of them focus on how annual NPP dynamics vary over several years. Little is known about how NPP responds to long-term climatic variation at the monthly or seasonal scales. We estimated NPP at three-month intervals from 2009 to 2017 for a tropical seasonal rainforest in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China using data from >2000 dendrometer bands and litter fall traps within a 20-ha permanent forest dynamics plot. We asked which climatic factor has the greatest effect on forest NPP at the sub annual scale, and how the relationships vary with seasonality. Calculations showed that NPP ranged from 12 to 20 t ha−1 yr−1, and that forest productivity showed a slight, but insignificant increase from 2009 to 2017. NPP was significantly higher in the wet season than that in the dry season and was significantly related to precipitation only when all data were concerned. During the dry season, precipitation had a significant positive influence on NPP, but no effect during the wet season. We further identified that there was a threshold effect of precipitation on NPP. Specifically, productivity increased more rapidly when monthly precipitation below 229 mm. In summary, we conclude that periods of low rainfall strongly regulate the productivity in this tropical seasonal rainforest which could guide the management design of water use efficiency in tree based land-use system, like agroforestry ecosystems.

Functional traits are increasingly used to understand the ecology of plants and to predict their responses to global changes. Unfortunately, trait data are unavailable for the majority of plant species. The lack of trait data is especially prevalent for hard-to-measure traits and for tropical plant species, potentially owing to the many inherent difficulties of working with species in remote, hyperdiverse rainforest systems. The living collections of botanic gardens provide convenient access to large numbers of tropical plant species and can potentially be used to quickly augment trait databases and advance our understanding of species' responses to climate change. In this review, we quantitatively assess the availability of trait data for tropical versus temperate species, the diversity of species available for sampling in several exemplar tropical botanic gardens and the validity of garden-based leaf and root trait measurements. Our analyses support the contention that the living collections of botanic gardens are a valuable scientific resource that can contribute significantly to research on plant functional ecology and conservation. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Biological collections for understanding biodiversity in the Anthropocene’.