1. Scientific Merits and Analytical Challenges of Tree‐Ring Densitometry
- Author
-
R. D'Arrigo, Thomas Pichler, Mauri Timonen, J. Van Acker, Alexander V. Kirdyanov, M. Kochbeck, M. D. Meko, Raúl Sánchez-Salguero, Anne Verstege, Björn Günther, J. Geary, Rob Wilson, Ricardo Villalba, J. Van den Bulcke, G. von Arx, Ignacio A. Mundo, Fritz H. Schweingruber, Loïc Schneider, Andrea Hevia, David Frank, Karolina Janecka, Ryszard J. Kaczka, Laia Andreu-Hayles, Holger Gärtner, Valerie Trouet, Kurt Nicolussi, T. De Mil, Nicole Davi, Rose Oelkers, Martin Wilmking, N. Loader, Yu Liu, Miloš Rydval, Jesper Björklund, Claudia Hartl, Ulf Büntgen, Huiming Song, Patrick Fonti, Jan Esper, Daniel Nievergelt, Tobias Scharnweber, and Björn E. Gunnarson
- Subjects
Accuracy and precision ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Computer science ,Resolution (electron density) ,X ray densitometry ,010502 geochemistry & geophysics ,computer.software_genre ,01 natural sciences ,Geophysics ,13. Climate action ,Relevance (information retrieval) ,Data mining ,computer ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,De facto standard - Abstract
X-ray microdensitometry on annually resolved tree-ring samples has gained an exceptional position in last-millennium paleoclimatology through the maximum latewood density (MXD) parameter, but also increasingly through other density parameters. For 50 years, X-ray based measurement techniques have been the de facto standard. However, studies report offsets in the mean levels for MXD measurements derived from different laboratories, indicating challenges of accuracy and precision. Moreover, reflected visible light-based techniques are becoming increasingly popular, and wood anatomical techniques are emerging as a potentially powerful pathway to extract density information at the highest resolution. Here we review the current understanding and merits of wood density for tree-ring research, associated microdensitometric techniques, and analytical measurement challenges. The review is further complemented with a careful comparison of new measurements derived at 17 laboratories, using several different techniques. The new experiment allowed us to corroborate and refresh "long-standing wisdom" but also provide new insights. Key outcomes include (i) a demonstration of the need for mass/volume-based recalibration to accurately estimate average ring density; (ii) a substantiation of systematic differences in MXD measurements that cautions for great care when combining density data sets for climate reconstructions; and (iii) insights into the relevance of analytical measurement resolution in signals derived from tree-ring density data. Finally, we provide recommendations expected to facilitate futureinter-comparability and interpretations for global change research.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF