1. Low-cost PM2.5 Sensors: An Assessment of Their Suitability for Various Applications
- Author
-
Kang Ho Ahn, Adrian Mabon, Phong K. Thai, Benjamin J. Mullins, Akwasi Bonsu Asumadu-Sakyi, Lidia Morawska, Mawutorli Nyaku, Zoran Ristovski, Xiaoting Liu, Jian Gao, Mandana Mazaheri, Yvonne Scorgie, Matthew Dunbabin, Gavin Fisher, and Rohan Jayaratne
- Subjects
Accuracy and precision ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,business.industry ,01 natural sciences ,Pollution ,Air quality monitoring ,Range (aeronautics) ,Environmental Chemistry ,Environmental science ,Process engineering ,business ,Air quality index ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Field conditions - Abstract
Recently, there has been a substantial increase in the availability and use of low-cost particulate matter sensors in a wide range of air quality applications. They carry the promise of revolutionising air quality monitoring, yet considerable reservations exist regarding their performance and capabilities, thus hindering the broader-scale utilization of these devices. In order to address these concerns and assess their feasibility and accuracy for various applications, we evaluated six low-cost PM2.5 sensors (the Sharp GP2Y1010AU0F, Shinyei PPD42NS, Plantower PMS1003, Innociple PSM305, Nova SDS011 and Nova SDL607) in laboratory and field conditions using two combustion aerosols, concrete dust and ambient particles. In assessing the performance of these sensors, we focussed on indicators such as the linearity, accuracy and precision, critically differentiating between these qualities, and employed inter-comparison (the coefficient of determination, R2). In the laboratory, all sensors responded well, with an R2 > 0.91 when the PM2.5 concentration was > 50 µg m–3, as measured by the DustTrak. In particular, the PMS1003 demonstrated good accuracy and precision in both laboratory and ambient conditions. However, some limitations were noted for the tested sensors at lower concentrations. For example, the Sharp and Shinyei sensors showed poor correlations (R2
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF