1. Suitability analysis and revised strategies for marine environmental carbon capture and storage (CCS) monitoring
- Author
-
Veerle A.I. Huvenne, Mario Esposito, Jonathan M. Bull, Stefan Sommer, Matthias Haeckel, Douglas P. Connelly, Jerry Blackford, Anita Flohr, Abdirahman M Omar, Mikael Suominen, Sergey M. Borisov, Anna Lichtschlag, James Asa Strong, Dirk Koopmans, Mark Schmidt, Jonas Gros, Matthew C. Mowlem, Allison Schaap, Christopher R. Pearce, Rachael H. James, Dirk de Beer, Marcella Dean, and Peter Linke
- Subjects
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Cover (telecommunications) ,Event (computing) ,Technology readiness level ,010501 environmental sciences ,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law ,01 natural sciences ,Pollution ,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering ,Reliability engineering ,General Energy ,13. Climate action ,Environmental monitoring ,Suitability analysis ,Carbon capture and storage ,Environmental science ,14. Life underwater ,Sensitivity (control systems) ,Baseline (configuration management) ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
Highlights • Approaches for CO2 leakage detection, attribution and quantification monitoring exist. • Many approaches cover multiple monitoring tasks simultaneously. • Sonars and chemical sensors on ships or AUVs can cover large areas. • Newer, more specific technologies can detect, verify and quantify smaller, localised leaks. Environmental monitoring of offshore Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) complexes requires robust methodologies and cost-effective tools to detect, attribute and quantify CO2 leakage in the unlikely event it occurs from a sub-seafloor reservoir. Various approaches can be utilised for environmental CCS monitoring, but their capabilities are often undemonstrated and more detailed monitoring strategies need to be developed. We tested and compared different approaches in an offshore setting using a CO2 release experiment conducted at 120 m water depth in the Central North Sea. Tests were carried out over a range of CO2 injection rates (6 - 143 kg d−1) comparable to emission rates observed from abandoned wells. Here, we discuss the benefits and challenges of the tested approaches and compare their relative cost, temporal and spatial resolution, technology readiness level and sensitivity to leakage. The individual approaches demonstrate a high level of sensitivity and certainty and cover a wide range of operational requirements. Additionally, we refer to a set of generic requirements for site-specific baseline surveys that will aid in the interpretation of the results. Critically, we show that the capability of most techniques to detect and quantify leakage exceeds the currently existing legal requirements.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF