Search

The population density of Cuvier's beaked whales is estimated acoustically with drifting near-surface hydrophone recorders in the Catalina Basin. Three empirical approaches (trial-based, distance-sampling, and spatially explicit capture-recapture) are used to estimate the probability of detecting the echolocation pulses as a function of range. These detection functions are used with two point-transect methods (snapshot and dive-cue) to estimate density. Measurement errors result in a small range of density estimates (3.9-5.4 whales per 1000 km2). Use of multiple approaches and methods allows comparison of the required information and assumptions of each. The distance-sampling approach with snapshot-based density estimates has the most stringent assumptions but would be the easiest to implement for large scale surveys of beaked whale density. Alternative approaches to estimating detection functions help validate this approach. The dive cue method of density estimation has promise, but additional work is needed to understand the potential bias caused by animal movement during a dive. Empirical methods are a viable alternative to the theoretical acoustic modeling approaches that have been used previously to estimate beaked whale density.

Acoustically equipped deep-water mobile autonomous platforms can be used to survey for marine mammals over intermediate spatiotemporal scales. Direct comparisons to fixed recorders are necessary to evaluate these tools as passive acoustic monitoring platforms. One glider and two drifting deep-water floats were simultaneously deployed within a deep-water cabled hydrophone array to quantitatively assess their survey capabilities. The glider was able to follow a pre-defined track while float movement was somewhat unpredictable. Fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus) 20 Hz pulses were recorded by all hydrophones throughout the two-week deployment. Calls were identified using a template detector, which performed similarly across recorder types. The glider data contained up to 78% fewer detections per hour due to increased low-frequency flow noise present during glider descents. The glider performed comparably to the floats and fixed recorders at coarser temporal scales; hourly and daily presence of detections did not vary by recorder type. Flow noise was related to glider speed through water and dive state. Glider speeds through water of 25 cm/s or less are suggested to minimize flow noise and the importance of glider ballasting, detector characterization, and normalization by effort when interpreting glider-collected data and applying it to marine mammal density estimation are discussed.

Primary funding for the SOCAL-BRS project was initially provided by the U.S. Navy’s Chief of Naval Operations Environmental Readiness Division and subsequently by the U.S. Navy's Living Marine Resources Program. This study measured the degree of behavioral responses in blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus) to controlled noise exposure off the southern California coast. High-resolution movement and passive acoustic data were obtained from non-invasive archival tags (n=42) whereas surface positions were obtained with visual focal follows. Controlled exposure experiments (CEEs) were used to obtain direct behavioral measurements before, during and after simulated and operational military mid-frequency active sonar (MFAS), pseudorandom noise (PRN) and controls (no noise exposure). For a subset of deep-feeding animals (n=21), active acoustic measurements of prey were obtained and used as contextual covariates in response analyses. To investigate potential behavioral changes within individuals as a function of controlled noise exposure conditions, two parallel analyses of time-series data for selected behavioral parameters (e.g. diving, horizontal movement and feeding) were conducted. This included expert scoring of responses according to a specified behavioral severity rating paradigm and quantitative change-point analyses using Mahalanobis distance statistics. Both methods identified clear changes in some conditions. More than 50% of blue whales in deep-feeding states responded during CEEs, whereas no changes in behavior were identified in shallow-feeding blue whales. Overall, responses were generally brief, of low to moderate severity, and highly dependent on exposure context such as behavioral state, source-to-whale horizontal range and prey availability. Response probability did not follow a simple exposure–response model based on received exposure level. These results, in combination with additional analytical methods to investigate different aspects of potential responses within and among individuals, provide a comprehensive evaluation of how free-ranging blue whales responded to mid-frequency military sonar. Postprint

In fall 2014 and spring 2015, passive acoustic data were collected via autonomous gliders east of Guam in an area that included the Mariana Trench Marine National Monument. A short (2-4 s), complex sound was recorded that features a ∼38 Hz moan with both harmonics and amplitude modulation, followed by broad-frequency metallic-sounding sweeps up to 7.5 kHz. This sound was recorded regularly during both fall and spring surveys. Aurally, the sound is quite unusual and most resembles the minke whale "Star Wars" call. It is likely this sound is biological and produced by a baleen whale.

There is a variety of evidence that increased anthropogenic noise (e.g., shipping, explosions, sonar) has a measureable effect on marine mammal species. Observed impacts range in severity from brief interruptions of basic life functions to physiological changes, acute injury, and even death. New research tools are needed to better measure and understand the potential effects of anthropogenic noise on marine mammals. Current behavioral response studies typically utilize ship-based sound sources to study potential acute behavioral responses in tagged animals experimentally exposed to noise. Integrating the sound source within animal-mounted passive acoustic and motion-sensing tags provides a novel tool for conducting additional highly controlled response studies. We developed and conducted pilot field trials of a prototype tag on five juvenile northern elephant seals, Mirounga angustirostris, using experimental exposures to both natural and anthropogenic noise stimuli. Results indicate behavioral responses were elicited in tagged individuals. However, no pattern was found in the occurrence and types of response compared to stimulus type. Responses during the ascending dive phase consisted of a dive inversion, or sustained reversal from ascending to descending (8 of 9 exposures). Dive inversions following exposure were 4–11 times larger than non-exposure inversions. Exposures received during the descending dive phase resulted in increased descent rates in 9 of 10 exposures. All 8 exposures during dives in which maximum dive depth was limited by bathymetry were characterized by increased flow noise in the audio recordings following exposure, indicating increased swim speed. Results of this study demonstrate the ability of an animal-mounted sound source to elicit behavioral responses in free-ranging individuals. Behavioral responses varied by seal, dive state at time of exposure, and bathymetry, but followed an overall trend of diving deeper and steeper and swimming faster. Responses did not consistently differ based on stimulus type, which may be attributable to the unique exposure context of the very close proximity of the sound source. Further technological development and focused field efforts are needed to advance and apply these tools and methods in subsequent behavioral response studies to address specific questions.

Although George Ioup did not use ocean gliders for passive acoustic monitoring, he recognized their value as platforms for PAM and encouraged others to use them. They function well as PAM platforms because (1) they move slowly, minimizing flow noise; (2) they have no propeller or continuously running machinery, minimizing motor noise; (3) they collect acoustic data nearly continuously; (4) they traverse the upper water column every few hours, measuring temperature and salinity as needed for calculating sound speed profiles and enabling accurate modeling of long-range acoustic propagation; (5) they can cover hundreds to thousands of kilometers in distance during a deployment, enabling them to monitor a large area and/or repeatedly monitor a smaller area; and (6) some models can dive to 1000 m, the depth at which some deep-diving cetaceans—sperm and beaked whales, frequent targets of PAM operations—forage and vocalize. Two models of gliders equipped with passive acoustic recording systems were deployed in the Northern Gulf of Mexico in the summers of 2015 and 2017 to study cetacean occurrence and behavior. Here, we summarize the virtues and hazards of glider PAM, and describe acoustic detection and classification of cetaceans in these recordings. [Research supported by GoMRI.]Although George Ioup did not use ocean gliders for passive acoustic monitoring, he recognized their value as platforms for PAM and encouraged others to use them. They function well as PAM platforms because (1) they move slowly, minimizing flow noise; (2) they have no propeller or continuously running machinery, minimizing motor noise; (3) they collect acoustic data nearly continuously; (4) they traverse the upper water column every few hours, measuring temperature and salinity as needed for calculating sound speed profiles and enabling accurate modeling of long-range acoustic propagation; (5) they can cover hundreds to thousands of kilometers in distance during a deployment, enabling them to monitor a large area and/or repeatedly monitor a smaller area; and (6) some models can dive to 1000 m, the depth at which some deep-diving cetaceans—sperm and beaked whales, frequent targets of PAM operations—forage and vocalize. Two models of gliders equipped with passive acoustic recording systems were deployed in t...

International audience; Northern elephant seals ( Mirounga angustirostris ) have a polygynous breeding system in which adult males establish dominance hierarchies that determine access to females. Acoustic signaling plays an important role in settling fights between males, as stereotyped displays elicit appropriate behavioral responses from individuals without contact during an energetically demanding breeding season. To determine whether reliable differences exist in the acoustic displays of individuals and whether these differences function to convey identity, we behaviorally and acoustically sampled male seals during the breeding season. Vocalizations were recorded during competitive interactions and analyzed for spectral, temporal, and amplitude characteristics. A cross-validated discriminant function analysis revealed small differences within—and significant differences between—the calls produced by 17 adult males of known dominance status. To determine whether acoustic displays serve as individual signatures that males learn to recognize during the breeding season, we conducted playback experiments to test if having prior experience with a particular caller would influence the approach or avoidance response of the listener. Our findings reveal that these unique acoustic signals serve as individual vocal signatures, and males likely remember the identity of their rivals based on call features that have been associated with the outcome of previous competitive interactions.