Search

Successful estimation of airgun‐array signatures from near‐field measurements depends on the accuracy of poorly controlled model parameters such as the effective sea surface reflection coefficient and source depth. We propose a method for prediction of robust source signatures, which are insensitive to fluctuations of the latter parameters. The method uses vertical pairs of near‐field hydrophones to measure near‐field pressure and its vertical gradient, combination of which eliminates sea surface reflections from the near‐field data. This excludes the uncertainty related to the fluctuating sea state and source depth from the process of inversion of the near‐field data for source signature. The method explicitly separates the recorded near‐field pressure into its up and down going components, which allows one to measure the effective frequency‐ and angle‐dependent sea surface reflection coefficient right at the source, as well as to estimate the actual source depth. Tests on synthetic and field data demonstrate robust performance of the method.

The imaging of steep salt boundaries has received much attention with the advent of improved wider azimuth acquisition designs and advanced imaging techniques such as reverse time migration (RTM), for example. However, despite these advancements in capability, there are cases in which the salt boundary is either poorly illuminated or completely absent in the migrated image. To provide a solution to this problem, we have developed two RTM methods for imaging salt boundaries, which use transmitted wavefields. In the first technique, downgoing waves, typically recorded in walkaway vertical seismic profile surveys, are used to image the salt flank via the generation of aplanatic isochrones. This image can be generated in the absence of an explicit interpretation of the salt flank using dual migration velocity models, as demonstrated on a 3D walkaway field data set from the Gulf of Mexico. In the second technique, we extend the basic theory to include imaging of upgoing source wavefields, which are transmitted at the base salt from below, as acquired by a surface acquisition geometry. This technique has similarities to the prism-imaging method, yet it uses transmitted instead of reflected waves at the salt boundary. Downgoing and upgoing methods are shown to satisfactorily generate an image of the salt flank; however, transmission imaging can create artifacts if reflection arrivals are included in the migration or the acquisition geometry is limited in extent. Increased wavelet stretch is also observed due to the higher transmission coefficient. An important benefit of these methods is that transmission imaging produces an opposite depth shift to errors in the velocity model compared with imaging of reflections. When combined with conventional seismic reflection surveys, this behavior can be used to provide a constraint on the accuracy of the salt and/or subsalt velocities.

Subsalt imaging in the Gulf of Mexico often suffers from illumination problems where various steep geologic features are not captured with conventional imaging techniques due to the lack of a direct wave path from the source to the steep reflector and back to the receiver. The exact geometry of these invisible salt flanks or salt welds is of great interest to interpreters during salt model building and prospect mapping. This paper discusses a suite of technologies that uses prism waves for imaging geologic interfaces with reverse time migration (RTM). Prism wave RTM imaging represents an example of imaging with multiples, Due to its specific geometric setup, it is often complementary to traditional RTMs. Specifically, the prism wave reflections can illuminate steep features that are invisible otherwise. Furthermore, by utilizing prism wave RTM in “reverse,” one can specify the steep event as the input prism wave generator (often a well-constrained salt boundary) and obtain an alternative (and perhaps cleaner) image of the sediment geometries next to this input event. In the industry, a lot of resources are spent on trying to improve illumination for the geologic features of interest by acquiring additional seismic surveys. With prism wave imaging, one can instead leverage the seismic signal that has already been recorded. We believe that even with moderate prism wave illumination uplift, the interpretive value gained can be quite large. To give the reader a glimpse of what is possible, we present several real data examples highlighting the utility of prism waves in interpretation.