Search

Invasive bivalves continue to spread and negatively impact freshwater ecosystems worldwide. As different metrics for body size and biomass are frequently used within the literature to standardise bivalve-related ecological impacts (e.g. respiration and filtration rates), the lack of broadly applicable conversion equations currently hinders reliable comparison across bivalve populations. To facilitate improved comparative assessment among studies originating from disparate geographical locations, we report body size and biomass conversion equations for six invasive freshwater bivalves (or species complex members) worldwide: Corbicula fluminea, C. largillierti, Dreissena bugensis, D. polymorpha, Limnoperna fortunei and Sinanodonta woodiana, and tested the reliability (i.e. precision and accuracy) of these equations. Body size (length, width and height) and biomass metrics of living-weight (LW), wet-weight (WW), dry-weight (DW), dry shell-weight (SW), shell free dry-weight (SFDW) and ash-free dry-weight (AFDW) were collected from a total of 44 bivalve populations located in Asia, the Americas and Europe. Relationships between body size and individual biomass metrics, as well as proportional weight-to-weight conversion factors, were determined. For most species, although inherent variation existed between sampled populations, body size directional measurements were found to be good predictors of all biomass metrics (e.g. length to LW, WW, SW or DW: R2 = 0.82–0.96), with moderate to high accuracy for mean absolute error (MAE): ±9.14%–24.19%. Similarly, narrow 95% confidence limits and low MAE were observed for most proportional biomass relationships, indicating high reliability for the calculated conversion factors (e.g. LW to AFDW; CI range: 0.7–2.0, MAE: ±0.7%–2.0%). Synthesis and applications. Our derived biomass prediction equations can be used to rapidly estimate the biologically active biomass of the assessed species, based on simpler biomass or body size measurements for a wide range of situations globally. This allows for the calculation of approximate average indicators that, when combined with density data, can be used to estimate biomass per geographical unit-area and contribute to quantification of population-level effects. These general equations will support meta-analyses, and allow for comparative assessment of historic and contemporary data. Overall, these equations will enable conservation managers to better understand and predict ecological impacts of these bivalves. Fil: Coughlan, Neil E.. The Queens University of Belfast; Irlanda. University College Cork; Irlanda Fil: Cunningham, Eoghan M.. The Queens University of Belfast; Irlanda Fil: Cuthbert, Ross N.. The Queens University of Belfast; Irlanda. Geomar-Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel; Alemania Fil: Joyce, Patrick W. S.. The Queens University of Belfast; Irlanda Fil: Anastácio, Pedro. Universidade de Évora; Portugal Fil: Banha, Filipe. Universidade de Évora; Portugal Fil: Bonel, Nicolás. Université Montpellier II; Francia. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Francia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida; Argentina Fil: Bradbeer, Stephanie J.. University of Leeds; Reino Unido Fil: Briski, Elizabeta. Geomar-Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel; Alemania Fil: Butitta, Vince L.. University of Wisconsin; Estados Unidos Fil: Cadková, Zuzana. Czech University of Life Sciences; República Checa Fil: Dick, Jaimie T. A.. The Queens University of Belfast; Irlanda Fil: Douda, Karel. Czech University of Life Sciences; República Checa Fil: Eagling, Lawrence E.. The Queens University of Belfast; Irlanda Fil: Ferreira Rodríguez, Noé. Universidad de Vigo; España Fil: Hünicken, Leandro Andrés. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia"; Argentina Fil: Johansson, Mattias L.. University of North Georgia; Estados Unidos Fil: Kregting, Louise. The Queens University of Belfast; Irlanda Fil: Labecka, Anna Maria. Jagiellonian University; Polonia Fil: Li, Deliang. Hunan Agricultural University; China Fil: Liquin, Florencia Fernanda. Universidad Nacional de Salta. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales. Instituto para el Estudio de la Biodiversidad de Invertebrados; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Salta; Argentina Fil: Marescaux, Jonathan. University of Namur; Bélgica. e-biom; Bélgica Fil: Morris, Todd J.. Fisheries and Ocean Canada; Canadá Fil: Nowakowska, Patrycja. University of Gdansk; Polonia Fil: Ozgo, Malgorzata. Kazimierz Wielki University; Polonia Fil: Paolucci, Esteban Marcelo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia"; Argentina Fil: Peribáñez, Miguel A.. Universidad de Zaragoza; España Fil: Riccardi, Nicoletta. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche; Italia Fil: Smith, Emily R. C.. University College London; Estados Unidos Fil: Sylvester, Francisco. Universidad Nacional de Salta. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales. Instituto para el Estudio de la Biodiversidad de Invertebrados; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Salta; Argentina

Before this study, researchers had not systematically surveyed the Rio Conchos, a tributary of the Rio Grande located in northern Mexico, for freshwater mussels. The Texas hornshell, Popenaias popeii, an endangered species under the United States Endangered Species Act, occurs in the main stem of the Rio Grande near its confluence with the Rio Conchos. The Texas hornshell's proximity to the Rio Conchos prompted us to survey to determine whether P. popeii also occurs within the Conchos basin. Additionally, previous researchers described the Conchos disk, Disconaias conchos, from the Rio Conchos but, to date, no one has reported live individuals of this species. The goal of this study was to determine the status of mussels within the Rio Conchos basin and to provide a baseline for future monitoring efforts. We qualitatively surveyed 11 sites within the Rio Conchos basin in May 2018. In total, we found two live individuals of the paper pondshell, Utterbackia imbecillis, at one site in the Rio San Pedro, a tributary of the Conchos River, and as shells of recently live individuals at two sites in the Rio Conchos. We found D. conchos as relict shells only at three sites, two in the Rio Conchos and one in a tributary of the river at Coyame. The lack of live or fresh-dead material suggests that D. conchos is extinct. We also found live individuals of nonnative Asian clams (Corbicula spp.) at 10 sites. Sand and gravel mining, high organic pollution, and inadequate instream flows were evident throughout the basin and might explain the general absence of mussels.

Understanding a species' historical and current distribution is critical when making conservation and management decisions. Recent observations in headwater streams of northern Illinois, USA, where no previous records of Iowa Darters Etheostoma exile occurred, revealed the need to re-evaluate its state-wide distribution. We conducted a series of species distribution modelling procedures coupled with targeted field surveys to generate historical and contemporary distribution models. The historical distribution model indicated E. exile distributions were concentrated across extreme northern Illinois. Both contemporary models included results of the historical model as a model variable. Based on the initial contemporary model, 30 potential Iowa Darter sites, 10 each of three groups representing low, medium and high model scores, were sampled during the summer of 2016. Field surveys provided nine new E. exile localities and presence-absence data from field surveys were then applied to revise the contemporary model. The revised contemporary model suggests a decrease in certain areas of its historic Illinois range, as well as areas where it has potentially expanded its range.

The distribution of the Illinois state-threatened Banded Killifish Fundulus diaphanus has remained largely unchanged in Illinois from 1880 to 2000, being restricted mainly to the northeastern corner of the state. One population identified as Western Banded Killifish F. d. menona has remained stable in the glacial lakes region along the southeastern Wisconsin–northeastern Illinois border. Starting in 2001 a second population began to spread and become more common along the Lake Michigan shoreline. From there the population expanded through the Chicago Area Waterway System into the Des Plaines River and eventually the Illinois River. Historical museum specimens from this region are identified as F. d. menona, but recent specimens are identified as hybrids between F. d. menona and Eastern Banded Killifish F. d. diaphanus. Subsequently, a third population appeared in the Mississippi River near the mouth of the Rock River in 2009 and has spread from there. These individuals are also identified as F. d. menona. The rapid expansion of Banded Killifish from Lake Michigan to the Illinois River appears to be an invasion of the Eastern subspecies F. d. diaphanus and the subsequent hybridization with the native Western subspecies. It is unknown where the Banded Killifish in the Mississippi River originated, possibly from populations 160 kilometers upstream or human introductions. As the Illinois River and Mississippi River populations continue to expand their ranges, their ecological impacts are unknown at this time.

Benthic macroinvertebrates were washed from nearly 1000 federally endangered freshwater mussels that had been collected from Pennsylvania during a reintroduction project to 2 eastern Illinois streams. Most benthic macroinvertebrates collected were larvae of the Neophylax fuscus, but other caddisflies and segmented worms were also observed. No unoccupied caddisfly cases were observed on live mussels, leaving open the question as to the seasonal fate of these microhabitats after caddisflies pupate and emerge in the Autumn of each year. Unionid mussel shells might modify local-scale species diversity by influencing physical and hydrau lic properties of microhabitats.

Freshwater mussels are declining globally, and effective conservation requires prioritizing research and actions to identify and mitigate threats impacting mussel species. Conservation priorities vary widely, ranging from preventing imminent extinction to maintaining abundant populations. Here, we develop a portfolio of priority research topics for freshwater mussel conservation assessment. To address these topics, we group research priorities into two categories: intrinsic or extrinsic factors. Intrinsic factors are indicators of organismal or population status, while extrinsic factors encompass environmental variables and threats. An understanding of intrinsic factors is useful in monitoring, and of extrinsic factors are important to understand ongoing and potential impacts on conservation status. This dual approach can guide conservation status assessments prior to the establishment of priority species and implementation of conservation management actions., La lista completa de autores de este trabajo puede verse en el archivo asociado., Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo