1. Comparison between eddy‐covariance and flux‐gradient size‐resolved dust fluxes during wind erosion events
- Author
-
Béatrice Marticorena, Sylvain Dupont, B. Khalfallah, Christel Bouet, Gilles Bergametti, Royston Fernandes, Mohamed Labiadh, J.‐l. Rajot, Eric Lamaud, Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphère (UMR ISPA), Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Sciences Agronomiques de Bordeaux-Aquitaine (Bordeaux Sciences Agro)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Institut d'écologie et des sciences de l'environnement de Paris (iEES Paris ), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 (UPEC UP12)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Laboratoire Interuniversitaire des Systèmes Atmosphériques (LISA (UMR_7583)), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 (UPEC UP12)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP), Institut des Régions Arides (IRA), ANR-15-CE02-0013,WIND-O-V,Erosion éolienne en présence de végétation éparse(2015), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 (UPEC UP12)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), and Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 (UPEC UP12)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)
- Subjects
Atmospheric Science ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,dust flux ,Field experiment ,Eddy covariance ,Astrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics ,010501 environmental sciences ,Atmospheric sciences ,01 natural sciences ,Physics::Geophysics ,Atmosphere ,Flux (metallurgy) ,Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) ,Astrophysics::Solar and Stellar Astrophysics ,wind erosion ,flux-gradient ,ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS ,Astrophysics::Galaxy Astrophysics ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,[SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, Atmosphere ,Geophysics ,13. Climate action ,Space and Planetary Science ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,Erosion ,Particle ,Environmental science ,Aeolian processes ,eddy-covariance ,Astrophysics::Earth and Planetary Astrophysics ,Particle counter - Abstract
International audience; Estimating accurately dust emission flux during aeolian erosion events is crucial for quantifying the amount of dust in the atmosphere. The rare existing field experiments quantifying such flux were mainly performed using the flux-gradient (FG) method. Here, we present the first intercomparison of the size-resolved dust fluxes estimated by both the FG and the eddy-covariance (EC) methods during several erosion events. Both methods were applied simultaneously during the WIND-O-V (WIND erOsion in presence of sparse Vegetation)'s 2017 field experiment over an isolated erodible bare plot in South Tunisia. Overall, both methods predict similar dust fluxes for particle smaller than about 4 μm. For coarser particles, the EC method predicts a smaller dust flux than the FG method. Factors explaining this difference are discussed such as the different sampling heads used by the dust particle counters of both methods, or the possible weakening of the constant dust flux layer at the location of the upper dust particle counter of the FG method. This intercomparison highlights the difficulties and advantages of each method as well as their complementarity.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF