1. On taking the D → 4 limit of Gauss-Bonnet gravity: theory and solutions
- Author
-
Robie A. Hennigar, David Kubiznak, Robert B. Mann, and Christopher Pollack
- Subjects
High Energy Physics - Theory ,Nuclear and High Energy Physics ,Gravity (chemistry) ,Black Holes ,FOS: Physical sciences ,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc) ,Type (model theory) ,01 natural sciences ,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology ,symbols.namesake ,High Energy Physics::Theory ,Gauss–Bonnet gravity ,Simple (abstract algebra) ,0103 physical sciences ,lcsh:Nuclear and particle physics. Atomic energy. Radioactivity ,Limit (mathematics) ,Einstein ,010306 general physics ,Mathematical physics ,Physics ,010308 nuclear & particles physics ,Computer Science::Information Retrieval ,16. Peace & justice ,High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th) ,Dimensional reduction ,symbols ,lcsh:QC770-798 ,Circular symmetry ,Classical Theories of Gravity - Abstract
We comment on the recently introduced Gauss-Bonnet gravity in four dimensions. We argue that it does not make sense to consider this theory to be defined by a set of $D\to 4$ solutions of the higher-dimensional Gauss-Bonnet gravity. We show that a well-defined $D\to 4$ limit of Gauss-Bonnet Gravity is obtained generalizing a method employed by Mann and Ross to obtain a limit of the Einstein gravity in $D=2$ dimensions. This is a scalar-tensor theory of the Horndeski type obtained by a dimensional reduction methods. By considering simple spacetimes beyond spherical symmetry (Taub-NUT spaces) we show that the naive limit of the higher-dimensional theory to four dimensions is not well defined and contrast the resultant metrics with the actual solutions of the new theory., Comment: 19 pages, no figures v2: added references
- Published
- 2020