1. Renseignement et politique de sécurité : un paradoxe orwellien
- Author
-
Franck Bulinge, Laboratoire Information, Milieux, Médias, Médiations - EA 3820 ( I3M ), Université Nice Sophia Antipolis ( UNS ), Université Côte d'Azur ( UCA ) -Université Côte d'Azur ( UCA ) -Université de Toulon ( UTLN ), Laboratoire Information, Milieux, Médias, Médiations - EA 3820 (I3M), Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (... - 2019) (UNS), and COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA)-COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA)-Université de Toulon (UTLN)
- Subjects
Cultural Studies ,0508 media and communications ,Sociology and Political Science ,Communication ,05 social sciences ,[ SHS.INFO.CONF ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences/domain_shs.info.conf ,050801 communication & media studies ,16. Peace & justice ,[SHS.INFO.CONF]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences/domain_shs.info.conf ,ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS - Abstract
EnglishThe attacks that have regularly hit France since 2012 have been met with successive laws, culminating in the state of emergency that the government has been seeking to write into constitutional law and which would, de facto, narrow the field of individual and public liberties as the price to pay for national security. Despite these measures, their accompanying warmongering messages and the infallible political support for intelligence agencies, the security policy has not succeeded in curbing the triple phenomenon of “radicalisation”, young people’s departures for Syria and terrorist attacks within France. And despite its alleged ineffectiveness, public opinion polls have remained favourable to this policy. This article discusses this situation as an Orwellian paradox. francaisAux attentats qui frappent regulierement la France depuis 2012, repondent des lois successives, jusqu’a l’etat d’urgence que le gouvernement a souhaite inscrire dans une loi constitutionnelle, resserrant de facto le champ des libertes individuelles et publiques comme prix de la securite nationale. En depit de ces mesures, des discours martiaux et du soutien politique infaillible aux services de renseignement, la politique de securite ne parvient pas a enrayer le triple phenomene que representent la « radicalisation », le depart de jeunes en Syrie et la commission d’attentats sur le territoire. En depit de son inefficacite assumee, les sondages de population restent favorables a cette politique. Dans cet article, nous mettons en evidence ce phenomene que nous qualifions de paradoxe orwellien.
- Published
- 2016