1. Weed suppression greatly increased by plant diversity in intensively managed grasslands: A continental-scale experiment
- Author
-
R. Llurba, Ignacio Delgado, Anne-Maj Gustavsson, Tor Lunnan, John Connolly, Maria-Teresa Sebastià, Marit Jørgensen, Anjo Elgersma, Ulrich Thumm, Alex De Vliegher, Rosemary P. Collins, Áslaug Helgadóttir, Caroline Brophy, Matthias Suter, Zydre Kadziuliene, Ole Hans Baadshaug, Alistair Black, Philippe Grieu, John A. Finn, Àngela Ribas, C. Porqueddu, Paivi Nykanen-Kurki, Michael Fothergill, Mats Höglind, Sigridur Dalmannsdottir, Piotr Golinski, Laura Kirwan, An Ghesquiere, Olivier Huguenin-Elie, Andreas Lüscher, Jure Čop, B. E. Frankow-Lindberg, Friedhelm Taube, Gilles Bélanger, University College Dublin (UCD), Centre de Ciència i Tecnologia Forestal de Catalunya (CTFC), Universitat de Lleida, Waterford Institute of Technology (WIT), Teagasc Agriculture and Food Development Authority (Teagasc), Forage production and grassland systems, Agroscope, Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS), Aberystwyth University, Istituto per il Sistema Produzione Animale in Ambiente Mediterraneo (ISPAAM ), Agricultural University of Iceland, Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Agriculture and Agri-Food [Ottawa] (AAFC), National University of Ireland Maynooth (Maynooth University), University of Ljubljana, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), Centro de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agroalimentaria de Aragon (CITA), Plant Sci Grp, Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen] (WUR), Department Crop Production Ecology, Partenaires INRAE, Research Institute for Agricultural, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Poznan University of Life Sciences, AGroécologie, Innovations, teRritoires (AGIR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Agrifood Research Finland, Centre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF), Institute of Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, Institute of Crop Sciences of CAAS [Beijing] (ICS CAAS), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse - Toulouse INP (FRANCE), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - INRA (FRANCE), Landbúnaðarháskóli Íslands (LBHI), and Agricultural University of Iceland (AUI)
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Agroecosystem ,forage swards ,Males herbes--Control ,Vistfræði ,agro-ecology ,Functional diversity ,01 natural sciences ,Grassland ,[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences ,Temporal development ,Legume–grass ,2. Zero hunger ,Biomass (ecology) ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,legume–grass ,Ecology ,generalised diversity‐interactions ,Sustainable agriculture ,Plantes farratgeres ,Búvísindi ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,Weed control ,temporal development ,Productivity (ecology) ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,Nitrogen acquisition ,Research Article ,Invasive Plants ,Field experiment ,Forage swards ,Evenness ,Generalised diversity-interactions ,Biology ,010603 evolutionary biology ,nitrogen acquisition ,Weed suppression ,geography ,Sjálfbærni ,Transgressive weed suppression ,agro‐ecology ,Plant Sciences Group ,15. Life on land ,Legume-grass ,Amélioration des plantes ,[SDV.BV.AP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Vegetal Biology/Plant breeding ,Transgressive ,Agronomy ,040103 agronomy & agriculture ,0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries ,Plöntuvistfræði ,plant diversity ,intensively managed grasslands ,Monoculture ,Weed ,Agro-ecology - Abstract
Publisher's version (útgefin grein), Grassland diversity can support sustainable intensification of grassland production through increased yields, reduced inputs and limited weed invasion. We report the effects of diversity on weed suppression from 3 years of a 31-site continental-scale field experiment. At each site, 15 grassland communities comprising four monocultures and 11 four-species mixtures based on a wide range of species' proportions were sown at two densities and managed by cutting. Forage species were selected according to two crossed functional traits, “method of nitrogen acquisition” and “pattern of temporal development”. Across sites, years and sown densities, annual weed biomass in mixtures and monocultures was 0.5 and 2.0 t DM ha−1 (7% and 33% of total biomass respectively). Over 95% of mixtures had weed biomass lower than the average of monocultures, and in two-thirds of cases, lower than in the most suppressive monoculture (transgressive suppression). Suppression was significantly transgressive for 58% of site-years. Transgressive suppression by mixtures was maintained across years, independent of site productivity. Based on models, average weed biomass in mixture over the whole experiment was 52% less (95% confidence interval: 30%–75%) than in the most suppressive monoculture. Transgressive suppression of weed biomass was significant at each year across all mixtures and for each mixture. Weed biomass was consistently low across all mixtures and years and was in some cases significantly but not largely different from that in the equiproportional mixture. The average variability (standard deviation) of annual weed biomass within a site was much lower for mixtures (0.42) than for monocultures (1.77). Synthesis and applications. Weed invasion can be diminished through a combination of forage species selected for complementarity and persistence traits in systems designed to reduce reliance on fertiliser nitrogen. In this study, effects of diversity on weed suppression were consistently strong across mixtures varying widely in species' proportions and over time. The level of weed biomass did not vary greatly across mixtures varying widely in proportions of sown species. These diversity benefits in intensively managed grasslands are relevant for the sustainable intensification of agriculture and, importantly, are achievable through practical farm-scale actions., We thank the many colleagues who have assisted this work. We thank M. Coll for her early contribution. Co-ordination of this project was supported by the EU Commission through COST Action 852 ‘Quality legume-based forage systems for contrasting environments’. M.T.S., R.L. and A.R. were supported by the Spanish Ministry of the Economy and Competitiveness through projects CARBOAGROPAS (CGL2006-13555- C03- 01/ BOS) and BIOGEI (CGL2013-49142- C2- 1- R) and the Ministry of the Environment through OPS (209/PC08/3-08.2). L.K. was supported by an award from Science Foundation Ireland (09/RFP/EOB2546). A.L., J.A.F., J.C. and M.S. were partly supported by the EU FP7 project ‘AnimalChange’ under grant agreement no. 266018.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF