Search

International audience; We introduce the prototype of a digital timing simulation and power analysis tool for integrated circuits that supports the involution delay model (Függer et al., IEEE TCAD 2019). Unlike the pure and inertial delay models typically used in digital timing analysis tools, the involution model faithfully captures short pulse propagation and related effects. Our Involution Tool facilitates experimental accuracy evaluation of variants of involution models, by comparing their timing and power predictions to those from SPICE and standard timing analysis tools. The tool is easily customizable w.r.t. instances of the involution model and circuits, and supports automatic test case generation and parameter sweeping. We demonstrate the capabilities of the Involution Tool by providing timing and power analysis results for three different circuits, namely, an inverter tree, the clock tree of an open-source processor, and a combinational circuit that involves multi-input NAND gates. Our evaluation uses two different technologies (15 nm and 65 nm CMOS), and three different variants of involution channels (Exp, Hill and SumExp-channels). It turns out that the timing and power predictions of all involution models are significantly better than the predictions obtained by standard digital simulations for the inverter tree and the clock tree, with the SumExp-channel channel clearly outperforming the others. For the NAND circuit, the performance of any involution model is generally comparable but not significantly better than that of standard models, however, which reveals some shortcomings of the existing involution channels for modeling multi-input gates.

International audience; We introduce the prototype of a digital timing simulation and power analysis tool for integrated circuit (Involution Tool) which employs the involution delay model introduced by Függer et al. at DATE'15. Unlike the pure and inertial delay models typically used in digital timing analysis tools, the involu-tion model faithfully captures pulse propagation. The presented tool is able to quantify for the first time the accuracy of the latter by facilitating comparisons of its timing and power predictions with both SPICE-generated results and results achieved by standard timing analysis tools. It is easily customizable, both w.r.t. different instances of the involution model and different circuits, and supports automatic test case generation, including parameter sweeping. We demonstrate its capabilities by providing timing and power analysis results for three circuits in varying technologies: an inverter tree, the clock tree of an open-source processor, and a combinational circuit that involves multi-input NAND gates. It turns out that the timing and power predictions of two natural types of involution models are significantly better than the predictions obtained by standard digital simulations for the inverter tree and the clock tree. For the NAND circuit, the performance is comparable but not significantly better. Our simulations thus confirm the benefits of the involution model, but also demonstrate shortcomings for multi-input gates.