Search

Rationale and objective: To investigate the MR characteristics of phlegmonous stage and abscess stage primary spinal epidural abscess. Materials and methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical and imaging characteristics of 27 cases of pathologically confirmed primary spinal epidural abscess. Predisposing conditions of all patients were collected. All patients underwent conventional magnetic resonance imaging, while fifteen patients also underwent post-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Results: The initial symptoms included back pain in 25 patients, fever in 18, motor deficit in five, and sensory changes in 13. Underlying diseases included distant site of infection in seven, injection therapy in five, neoplasm in five, chronic inflammatory disease in five, diabetes mellitus in four, alcoholism in three, metabolic disorder in three, hepatopathy in three, and obesity in two. Abscess location was ventral epidural space in 15 patients (55.6%) and dorsal epidural space in 12 (44.4%). On T1-weighted image, the abscess was hypointense to the spinal cord in 23 patients (85%) and isointense in four (15%). All abscesses were hyperintense to the spinal cord on T2-weighted image. Among the 15 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced imaging, ring enhancement was present in 13 and homogeneous enhancement in two. Adjacent vertebrae body edema was present in four patients. The abscess was purely intraspinal in 25 patients (92.6%). Paraspinal extension was present in two (7.4%). Conclusion: Primary spinal epidural abscess patients have one or more predisposing conditions. Phlegmonous stage primary spinal epidural abscess appears isointense on T1WI and hyperintense on T2WI and enhancement is homogeneous. Abscess stage primary spinal epidural abscess hyperintense on T2WI and hypointense on T1WI and ring enhancement. Presence of vertebral body edema is an important sign to help diagnose primary spinal epidural abscess. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design. Retrospective cohort study. Objective. To externally validate the Spinal Orthopaedic Research Group (SORG) index for predicting 90-day mortality from spinal epidural abscess and compare its utility to the 11-item modified frailty index (mFI-11) and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI).Summary of Background Data. Providing a mortality estimate may guide informed patient and clinician decision-making. A number of prognostic tools and calculators are available to help predict the risk of mortality from spinal epidural abscess, including the SORG index, which estimates 90-day postdischarge mortality. External validation is essential before wider use of any clinical prediction tool. Materials and Methods. Patients were identified using hospital coding. Medical and radiologic records were used to confirm the diagnosis. Mortality data and data to calculate the SORG index, mFI-11, and CCI were collected. Area under the curve and calibration plots were used to analyze. Results. One hundred and fifty patients were included: 58 were female (39%), with a median age of 63 years. Fifteen deaths (10%) at 90 days postdischarge and 20 (13%) at one year. The mean SORG index was 13.6%, the mean CCI 2.75, and the mean mFI-11 was 1.34. The SORG index (P= 0.0006) and mFI-11 (P< 0.0001) were associated with 90-day mortality. Area under the curve for SORG, mFI-11, and CCI were 0.81, 0.84, and 0.49, respectively. The calibration slope for the SORG index showed slight overestimation in the middle ranges of the predicted probability, more so than mFI-11, and was not well-calibrated over the higher ranges of predicted probability. Conclusions. This study externally validated the SORG index, demonstrating its utility in our population at predicting 90-day mortality; however, it was less well calibrated than the mFI-11. Variations in algorithm performance may be a result of differences in socioethnic composition and health resources between development and validation centres. Continued multicenter data input may help improve such algorithms and their generalisability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Rationale and objective To investigate the MR characteristics of phlegmonous stage and abscess stage primary spinal epidural abscess. Materials and methods This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical and imaging characteristics of 27 cases of pathologically confirmed primary spinal epidural abscess. Predisposing conditions of all patients were collected. All patients underwent conventional magnetic resonance imaging, while fifteen patients also underwent post-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Results The initial symptoms included back pain in 25 patients, fever in 18, motor deficit in five, and sensory changes in 13. Underlying diseases included distant site of infection in seven, injection therapy in five, neoplasm in five, chronic inflammatory disease in five, diabetes mellitus in four, alcoholism in three, metabolic disorder in three, hepatopathy in three, and obesity in two. Abscess location was ventral epidural space in 15 patients (55.6%) and dorsal epidural space in 12 (44.4%). On T1-weighted image, the abscess was hypointense to the spinal cord in 23 patients (85%) and isointense in four (15%). All abscesses were hyperintense to the spinal cord on T2-weighted image. Among the 15 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced imaging, ring enhancement was present in 13 and homogeneous enhancement in two. Adjacent vertebrae body edema was present in four patients. The abscess was purely intraspinal in 25 patients (92.6%). Paraspinal extension was present in two (7.4%). Conclusion Primary spinal epidural abscess patients have one or more predisposing conditions. Phlegmonous stage primary spinal epidural abscess appears isointense on T1WI and hyperintense on T2WI and enhancement is homogeneous. Abscess stage primary spinal epidural abscess hyperintense on T2WI and hypointense on T1WI and ring enhancement. Presence of vertebral body edema is an important sign to help diagnose primary spinal epidural abscess.

A spinal epidural empyema (SEE) is a collection of pus between the bones of the vertebral column and the dura covering the spinal cord. It is an uncommon disease in the pediatric population. It requires prompt diagnosis and targeted treatment to prevent permanent disability. The gold standard of management involves surgical treatment and systemic antibiotic therapy. We present the clinical case of a 15-year-old boy with focal back pain in the lower thoracic region, causing limitations of spinal mobility, but no neurological dysfunction. Due to the patient’s history, elevated inflammatory parameters and magnetic resonance imaging, epidural empyema was detected. The patient was operated on with the evacuation of pus from epidural space and temporary drainage placement and following administration of intravenous antibiotics. A complete recovery was achieved. The non-specificity of the SEE symptoms poses a significant challenge for clinicians. Increased vigilance is therefore necessary when diagnosing seemingly benign disorders for a favorable clinical outcome.

There is limited consensus regarding management of spinal epidural abscesses (SEAs), particularly in patients without neurologic deficits. Several models have been created to predict failure of medical management in patients with SEA. We evaluate the external validity of 5 predictive models in an independent cohort of patients with SEA. One hundred seventy-six patients with SEA between 2010 and 2019 at our institution were identified, and variables relevant to each predictive model were collected. Published prediction models were used to assign probability of medical management failure to each patient. Predicted probabilities of medical failure and actual patient outcomes were used to create receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve used to quantify a model's discriminative ability. Calibration curves were plotted using predicted probabilities and actual outcomes. The Spiegelhalter z-test was used to determine adequate model calibration. One model (Kim et al) demonstrated good discriminative ability and adequate model calibration in our cohort (ROC = 0.831, P value = 0.83). Parameters included in the model were age >65, diabetes, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection, and neurologic impairment. Four additional models did not perform well for discrimination or calibration metrics (Patel et al, ROC = 0.580, P ≤ 0.0001; Shah et al, ROC = 0.653, P ≤ 0.0001; Baum et al, ROC = 0.498, P ≤ 0.0001; Page et al, ROC = 0.534, P ≤ 0.0001). Only 1 published predictive model demonstrated acceptable discrimination and calibration in our cohort, suggesting limited generalizability of the evaluated models. Multi-institutional data may facilitate the development of widely applicable models to predict medical management failure in patients with SEA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Thoracic spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare but dangerous condition, and traditional surgical methods are accompanied by extensive trauma and approach‐related complications. Here we introduce the technique of full‐endoscopic transforaminal debridement and decompression and evaluate its feasibility for treating brucellar thoracic SEA. Methods We performed thoracic full‐endoscopic transforaminal decompression and debridement on two patients with neurological deficits caused by brucellar SEA, which is mainly composed of granulation tissue rather than pus. Postoperative MRI was conducted to confirm the presence of any residual abscess compressing the nerves. Frankel grading was employed to assess the recovery of neurological function, and complications were documented. Results There were no occurrences of dural tear, postoperative hematoma, or pulmonary complications. Their neurological function had significantly improved after surgery, and postoperative MRI confirmed no residual abscess compressing the spinal cord. During the 2‐year follow‐up, one patient achieved complete recovery (from Frankel‐C to Frankel‐E), while another patient improved from Frankel‐A to Frankel‐D. Neither patient experienced infection recurrence, instability, nor kyphotic deformity. Conclusion We described the novel application of transforaminal endoscopic surgery in brucellar thoracic granulomatous SEA and preliminarily indicated the feasibility of this technique as a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery.

Objective: Thoracic spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare but dangerous condition, and traditional surgical methods are accompanied by extensive trauma and approach‐related complications. Here we introduce the technique of full‐endoscopic transforaminal debridement and decompression and evaluate its feasibility for treating brucellar thoracic SEA. Methods: We performed thoracic full‐endoscopic transforaminal decompression and debridement on two patients with neurological deficits caused by brucellar SEA, which is mainly composed of granulation tissue rather than pus. Postoperative MRI was conducted to confirm the presence of any residual abscess compressing the nerves. Frankel grading was employed to assess the recovery of neurological function, and complications were documented. Results: There were no occurrences of dural tear, postoperative hematoma, or pulmonary complications. Their neurological function had significantly improved after surgery, and postoperative MRI confirmed no residual abscess compressing the spinal cord. During the 2‐year follow‐up, one patient achieved complete recovery (from Frankel‐C to Frankel‐E), while another patient improved from Frankel‐A to Frankel‐D. Neither patient experienced infection recurrence, instability, nor kyphotic deformity. Conclusion: We described the novel application of transforaminal endoscopic surgery in brucellar thoracic granulomatous SEA and preliminarily indicated the feasibility of this technique as a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare and life-threatening infection within the epidural space with significant functional impairment and morbidity. Active debate remains over whether to operate for SEAs, with limited existing data comparing the long-term survivability after surgical versus nonsurgical management. This study aims to determine the long-term survival of patients who underwent surgical and nonsurgical management for SEA. Retrospective cohort study. A total of 250 consecutive SEA patients. Survival and mortality rates, complications. All patients treated at a tertiary medical center for a primary SEA from January 2000 to June 2020 are identified. Data collection is by retrospective chart review. Cox proportional hazards regression models are used for all survival analyses while controlling for potential confounding variables and with multiple testing corrections. A total of 35 out of 250 patients died with an overall all-cause mortality of 14%. More than half of all deaths occurred within 90 days after treatment. The 90-day, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates are 92.8%, 89.2%, and 86.4%, respectively. Among surgery patients, the all-cause mortality was 13.07%, compared to 16.22% for medically-managed patients. Surgical treatment (decompression, fusion, debridement) significantly reduced the risk of death by 62.4% compared to medical therapy (p=.03), but surgery patients experienced a significantly longer mean length of stay (p=.01). Risk factors of short-term mortality included hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dL), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 4+, and cardiac arrest. Risk factors of long-term mortality were immunocompromised state, elevated WBC count >12,000, sepsis, septic shock, ASA 4+, and cardiac arrest (p<.05). In terms of complications, surgically-managed patients experienced a higher proportion of deep vein thrombosis (p<.05). The overall long-term survivability of SEA treatment is relatively high at (86% at 5-year) in this study. The following SEA mortality risk factors were identified: hypoalbuminemia (short-term), immunocompromised state (long-term), leukocytosis (long-term), sepsis and septic shock (long-term), ASA 4+ and cardiac arrest (overall). For primary SEA patients, surgical management may reduce mortality risk compared to nonsurgical management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, the incidence of spinal epidural abscesses (SEA) has tripled in number and nonoperative management has risen in popularity. While there has been a shift towards reserving surgical intervention for patients with focal neurologic deficits, a third of patients will still fail medical management and require surgical intervention. Failure to understand long-term quality of life and functional outcomes hinders effective decision making and prognostication. To describe patterns and associated factors impacting long-term quality of life following treatment of spinal epidural abscess. Multicenter cohort study at two urban academic tertiary referral centers and two community centers. Adult patients treated for a spinal epidural abscess. EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5L (EQ5D), Neuro-Quality of Life Lower Extremity – Mobility (Short Form; NeuroQoL-LE), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (short form 4a; PROMIS PF), and PROMIS Global Mental Health score (PROMIS Mental). Eligible patients were enrolled and administered questionnaires. Multivariable analysis assessed the influence of ambulatory status on HRQL, adjusting for covariates including age, biologic sex, Charlson comorbidity index, intravenous drug use, management approach, and ASIA grade on presentation. Sixty-one patients were enrolled (mean age 60.5 years, 46% male). Thirty-four patients (58%) underwent operative management. Mean standard deviation (SD) results for HRQL measures were: EQ5D 0.51 (0.37), EQ5D visual analogue scale 60.34 (25.11), NeuroQoL Lower extremity 41.47 (10.64), PROMIS physical function 39.49 (10.07), and PROMIS Global Mental Health 44.23 (10.36). Adjusted analysis demonstrated ambulatory status at presentation, and at 1 year, to be important drivers of HRQL, irrespective of other factors including IVDU and ASIA grade. Patients with independent ambulatory function at 1 year had mean EQ5D utility of 0.65 (95% CI 0.55, 0.75), whereas those requiring assistive devices saw a 49% decrease with mean EQ5D utility of 0.32 (0.14, 0.51). Ambulatory status was associated with global and physical function but did not impact overall health self-assessment or mental health scores. We found that ambulatory status was the most important factor associated with long-term HRQL regardless of other factors such as ASIA grade or IVDU. Given prior literature demonstrating the protective effect of operative intervention on ambulatory function, this highlights ambulatory dysfunction as a potential indication for surgery and a marker of poor long-term prognosis, even in the absence of focal neurologic deficits. Our work also highlights the importance of optimized long-term rehabilitation strategies aimed to preserve ambulatory function in this high-risk population. Level III, cohort study [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed forms of cancer, and it is associated with several common symptoms and signs such as rectal bleeding, altered bowel habits, abdominal pain, anemia, and unintentional weight loss. Sciatica, a debilitating condition in which the patient experiences paresthesia and pain in the dermatome of associated lumbosacral nerve roots or sciatic nerve distribution, is not considered one of these. Here we present a case of colorectal cancer manifesting symptoms of sciatica alone. Case presentation A 68-year-old male presented with progressive lower back pain radiating to his left thigh and calf over L5/S1 dermatome. Sciatica was suspected and initially underwent conservative treatment with analgesics. However, the symptoms progressed and MRI revealed an epidural abscess surprisingly. Surgical debridement was performed and pus culture isolated Streptococcus gallolyticus. Based on the strong association of S. gallolyticus with colorectal cancer, the presence of this pathogen prompted further tumor evaluation, even in the absence of the typical symptoms and signs. This investigation ultimately leads to the diagnosis of sigmoid adenocarcinoma. Conclusions Although rare, sciatica caused by S. gallolyticus infection of the spinal epidural space may serve as the initial presentation of colorectal cancer. Physicians should be aware of the strong association between S. gallolyticus and colorectal cancer. Based on what we currently know about the condition; a thorough systematic assessment of occult neoplasia for patients with S. gallolyticus infection is recommended.

Background: Several recent studies have highlighted the advantages of early decompressive surgery for patients with spinal epidural abscesses, specifically in terms of neurological function and overall quality of life. However, these studies predominantly advocate for surgery within 24 hours of admission, a time frame that may prove challenging for many hospitals because of limited operating room availability and bed occupancy. Consequently, it is pertinent to investigate whether a more flexible definition of "early surgery" yields observable benefits for patients to address these practical constraints. Materials and Methods: In this 10-year retrospective study, we analyzed the electronic medical records of 130 patients who underwent decompressive surgery for epidural abscess. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the time intervals between admission and surgery: ≤24 hours (n = 24), 24 to 72 hours (n = 26), and >72 hours (n = 80). Comparative assessments of demographic data, clinical presentations, and preoperative imaging characteristics revealed no statistically significant differences. We conducted separate analyses at 24 hours (n = 24 vs n = 106) and 72 hours (n = 50 vs n = 80) to explore the effects of different cutoff times. Neurological improvement (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale [AIS] grade), daily living function (modified Prolo scale) changes 6 months postdischarge, and financial burden (hospitalization and postoperative stay duration, total expenditure) were evaluated as outcome measures. In addition, we compared the outcomes of patients within the 24- to 72-hour time range with those in the ≤24- and >72-hour group to determine any differences among the three groups. Results: Significant changes in AIS grade (1.17 vs 0.66, P = 0.019) and modified Prolo scale (4.21 vs2.90, P = 0.011) were observed in the 24-hour group, whereas no such changes were seen in the 72-hour group. However, both groups showed reductions in financial bur- den, including hospitalization duration (24-hour group: 27.8 vs 46.8 days, P < 0.001 ; 72-hour group: 31.3 vs 50.7 days, P < 0.001) and total cost (24-hour group: $6551 vs $11,024, P < 0.001; 72-hour group: $6709 vs $12,406, P < 0.001). When analyzing the subgroup of patients with a time interval between 24 and 72 hours, we observed a loss of beneficial effects on AIS grade changes (1.2 vs 0.6, P = 0.045) and modified Prolo scale improvement (4.2 vs 3.1, P = 0.044) compared with the ≤24-hour group. However, this subgroup still exhibited positive effects in terms of reduced financial burden, including hospitalization duration (34.6 vs 50.7 days, P = 0.002) and total cost ($6851 vs $12,406, P < 0.001), when compared with the >72-hour group. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that delaying decompressive surgery up to 72 hours after admission negates its benefits in enhancing neurological recovery and restoring daily life capacity. Nonetheless, this surgical approach continues to provide financial advantages by alleviating the financial burden on patients and the health care system. Further research with a larger sample size is recommended to deepen our understanding of these advantages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: There has been an increase in the incidence of spinal epidural abscesses in the recent years. Most published series do not distinguish abscesses secondary to spondylodiscitis from non-associated with spondylodiscitis that originate directly in the epidural space. Materials and Methods: During the period from March 2014 to March 2022, 4 patients (two females and two males) aged from 48 to 70 years with spinal epidural abscesses without presence of spondylodiscitis, were treated at our institution. The history, clinical presentation, paraclinical and imaging data, the type of treatment and outcome were analyzed. Results: All patients had vertebralgia, and in three of the cases it was accompanied by pronounced motor and sensory deficits. Abscesses were located in the cervicothoracic region in two patients, in the thoracic region in one, and in the thoracolumbar region in one, involving segments 5, 7, 4, and 11, respectively. In all patients, a posterior operative access was used -- laminectomy, through which decompression of the nerve structures and evacuation of the epidural abscess was achieved. Staphylococcus aureus was isolated from the abscess in three cases. Postoperatively, the neurologic deficits improved in all patients except for one, who developed uncontrollable sepsis and multiple organ failure and died 48 hours after surgery. The last patient was diagnosed with COVID-19 during the second week, and the patient died on day 35. Conclusion: In pure spinal epidural abscesses not associated with spondylodiscitis, there is no involvement of the vertebral bodies by the infection, which significantly reduces the risk of subsequent development of instability, and spinal fusion is required only in isolated cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT: Background: Spinal epidural abscesses (SEAs) are a devastating condition with high levels of associated morbidity and mortality. Hounsfield units (HUs), a marker of radiodensity on CT scans, have previously been correlated with adverse events following spinal interventions. We evaluated whether HUs might also be associated with all-cause complications and/or mortality in this high-risk population. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was carried out within an academic health system in the United States. Adults diagnosed with a SEA between 2006 and 2021 and who also had a CT scan characterizing their SEA within 6 months of diagnosis were considered. HUs were abstracted from the 4 vertebral bodies nearest to, but not including, the infected levels. Our primary outcome was the presence of composite 90-day complications and HUs represented the primary predictor. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted adjusting for demographic and disease-specific confounders. In sensitivity testing, separate logistic regression analyses were conducted (1) in patients aged 65 and older and (2) with mortality as the primary outcome. Results: Our cohort consisted of 399 patients. The overall incidence of 90-day complications was 61.2% (n=244), with a 7.8% (n=31) 90-day mortality rate. Those experiencing complications were more likely to have undergone surgery to treat their SEA (58.6% vs. 46.5%; p=.018) but otherwise the cohorts were similar. HUs were not associated with composite 90-day complications (Odds ratio [OR] 1.00 [95% CI 1.00—1.00]; p=.842). Similar findings were noted in sensitivity testing. Conclusions: While HUs have previously been correlated with adverse events in certain clinical contexts, we found no evidence to suggest that HUs are associated with all-cause complications or mortality in patients with SEAs. Future research hoping to leverage 3-dimensional imaging as a prognostic measure in this patient population should focus on alternative targets. Level of Evidence: Level III; Observational Cohort study.

Background: Owing to the lack of evidence on the diagnostics, clinical course, treatment, and outcomes of patients with extremely rare spinal intradural abscess (SIA) and spinal epidural abscess (SEA), we retrospectively analyzed and compared a cohort of patients to determine the phenotyping of both entities. Methods: Over a period of 20 years, we retrospectively analyzed the electronic medical records of 78 patients with SIA and SEA. Results: The patients with SIA showed worse motor scores (MS scores) on admission (SIA: 20 ± 26 vs. SEA: 75 ± 34, p < 0.001), more often with an ataxic gait (SIA: 100% vs. SEA: 31.8%, p < 0.001), and more frequent bladder or bowel dysfunction (SIA: 91.7% vs. SEA: 27.3%, p < 0.001) compared to the SEA patients. Intraoperative specimens showed a higher diagnostic sensitivity in the SEA patients than the SIA patients (SIA: 66.7% vs. SEA: 95.2%, p = 0.024), but various pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus (SIA 33.3% vs. SEA: 69.4%) and Streptococci and Enterococci (SIA 33.3% vs. SEA: 8.1%, p = 0.038) were detected in both entities. The patients with SIA developed sepsis more often (SIA: 75.0% vs. SEA: 18.2%, p < 0.001), septic embolism (SIA: 33.3% vs. SEA: 8.3%, p = 0.043), signs of meningism (SIA: 100% vs. 18.5%, p < 0.001), ventriculitis or cerebral abscesses (SIA: 41.7% vs. SEA: 3.0%, p < 0.001), and pneumonia (SIA: 58.3% vs. SEA: 13.6%, p = 0.002). The mean MS score improved in both patient groups after surgery (SIA: 20 to 35 vs. SEA: 75 to 90); however, the SIA patients showed a poorer MS score at discharge (SIA: 35 ± 44 vs. SEA: 90 ± 20, p < 0.001). C-reactive protein (CrP) (SIA: 159 to 49 vs. SEA: 189 to 27) and leukocyte count (SIA: 15 to 9 vs. SEA: 14 to 7) were reduced at discharge. The SIA patients had higher rates of disease-related mortality (SIA: 33.3% vs. SEA: 1.5%, p = 0.002), had more pleural empyema (SIA: 58.3% vs. SEA: 13.6%, p = 0.002), required more than one surgery (SIA: 33.3% vs. SEA 13.6%, p = 0.009), were treated longer with intravenous antibiotics (7 ± 4 w vs. 3 ± 2 w, p < 0.001) and antibiotics overall (12 ± 10 w vs. 7 ± 3 w, p = 0.022), and spent more time in the hospital (SIA: 58 ± 36 vs. SEA: 26 ± 20, p < 0.001) and in the intensive care unit (SIA: 14 ± 18 vs. SEA: 4 ± 8, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Our study highlighted distinct clinical phenotypes and outcomes between both entities, with SIA patients displaying a markedly less favorable disease course in terms of complications and outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) with pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis (PVO) is a rare illness with a steadily increasing incidence. However, comparative analyses of young and older patients with SEA are lacking. We aimed to compare the clinical course of patients aged 18–64 years, 65–79 years, and ≥ 80 years undergoing surgery for SEA. Clinical and imaging data were retrospectively collected from the institutional database between September 2005 and December 2021. Ninety-nine patients aged 18–64 years, 45 patients aged 65–79 years, and 32 patients ≥ 80 years were enrolled. Patients ≥ 80 years presented with a poorer baseline history (9.2 ± 2.4), as indicated by the CCI, than their younger counterparts (18–74 years: 4.8 ± 1.6;6.5 ± 2.5; p < 0.001). Patients aged 65–79 years and 80 years had a significantly longer length of stay. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in those aged ≥ 80 years compared to their younger counterparts (≥ 80 years, n = 3, 9.4% vs. 18–64 years, n = 0, 0.0%; 65–79 years, n = 0, 0.0%; p < 0.001), while no differences in 90-day mortality or 30-day readmission were observed. After surgery, a significant decrease in C-reactive protein levels and leukocytes and amelioration of motor scores were observed in all the groups. Of note, older age (> 65 years), presence of comorbidities, and poor preoperative neurological condition were significant predictors of mortality. Surgical management led to significant improvements in laboratory and clinical parameters in all age groups. However, older patients are prone to multiple risks, requiring meticulous evaluation before surgery. Nevertheless, the risk profile of younger patients should not be underestimated. The study has the limitations of a retrospective design and small sample size. Larger randomized studies are warranted to establish the guidelines for the optimal management of patients from every age group and to identify the patients who can benefit from solely conservative management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In developing countries, Mycobacterium tuberculosis is rampant and it's the first differential in causation of spinal epidural abscess (SEA) or Psoas abscess (PA). This microbiota pertaining to these diseases, is in contrast with that of developed nations, where it is primarily bacterial. The burden of intra-venous drug abusers is very high in India, however there is corresponding rarity of intravenous drug abuse (IVDA) related SEA/PA case studies. Even at global scale, there is no fixed recommendation in the surgical management (instrumentation and fusion) of IVDA-SEA subset of patients owing to their low volume and poor-follow-up. In this back-ground authors present their experience of managing an IVDA associated long segment multi-level SEA with giant PA who presented with ASIA Grade-C neurological deficit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: A spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare pathology that may have devastating consequences if unrecognized and untreated. It consists of an extensive purulent collection in the spinal epidural space. It is a major medical and surgical emergency that may be difficult to appreciate, especially early in the disease course. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is currently the most sensitive and specific examination for the diagnosis of spinal epidural pathologies. If undertaken in a timely fashion, treatment can be successful. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a 64 years old male with a history of urinary tract intervention 2 months earlier, admitted for the management of spinal cord compression due to a dorsal spinal abscess. The patient was successfully treated with surgery and antibiotics after bacteriological study of pus samples. CONCLUSION: Spinal epidural abscess is a rare and dangerous disease, it can be tricky to diagnose. If undertaken in a timely fashion, treatment can be successful. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare, catastrophic condition for which diagnostic delays are common. Our national group develops evidence‐based guidelines, known as clinical management tools (CMT), to reduce high‐risk misdiagnoses. We study whether implementation of our back pain CMT improved SEA diagnostic timeliness and testing rates in the emergency department (ED). Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study before and after implementation of a nontraumatic back pain CMT for SEA in a national group. Outcomes included diagnostic timeliness and test utilization. We used regression analysis to compare differences before (January 2016–June 2017) and after (January 2018–December 2019) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) clustered by facility. We graphed monthly testing rates. Results: In 59 EDs, pre versus post periods included 141,273 (4.8%) versus 192,244 (4.5%) back pain visits and 188 versus 369 SEA visits, respectively. After implementation, SEA visits with prior related visits were unchanged (12.2% vs. 13.3%, difference +1.0%, 95% CI –4.5% to 6.5%). Mean number of days to diagnosis decreased but not significantly (15.2 days vs. 11.9 days, difference −3.3 days, 95% CI −7.1 to 0.6 days). Back pain visits receiving CT (13.7% vs. 21.1%, difference +7.3%, 95% CI 6.1% to 8.6%) and MRI (2.9% vs. 4.4%, difference +1.4%, 95% CI 1.0% to 1.9%) increased. Spine X‐rays decreased (22.6% vs. 20.5%, difference 2.1%, 95% CI –4.3% to 0.1%). Back pain visits receiving erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C‐reactive protein increased (1.9% vs. 3.5%, difference +1.6%, 95% CI 1.3% to 1.9%). Conclusions: Back pain CMT implementation was associated with an increased rate of recommended imaging and laboratory testing in back pain. There was no associated reduction in the proportion of SEA cases with a related prior visit or time to SEA diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To describe the clinical significance of prompt, adequate, and targeted intravenous antibiotic (IV antibiotic) therapy in the successful management of spinal epidural abscess (SEA) associated with Streptococcus intermedius (S. intermedius) infection. Case description: SEA is a rare, but catastrophic infection that may result in a high risk of permanent neurological disability. A 52-year-old Chinese female patient was presented to the emergency department due to 2  years of low back pain and 3  days of decreased muscle strength in the extremities. The blood culture confirmed the presence of S. intermedius infection, and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated widespread epidural abscesses in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine canal. Empirical IV antibiotic therapy with vancomycin was promptly initiated, with meropenem and moxifloxacin added subsequently based on blood culture results. After 5  days of IV antibiotic treatment, the patient’s blood culture became negative. 6  weeks later, a follow-up MRI showed a decrease in the size of the abscess. The patient’s muscle strength was mostly restored after 2  months of IV antibiotic treatment. Conclusion: Repeat examinations or gadolinium-enhanced MRI should be considered when initial MRI findings are not diagnostic of SEA. For extensive SEA caused by Streptococcus intermedius infection, surgery may be nonessential, and the judicious antibiotic selection and adequate treatment duration are pivotal for successful conservative management. Furthermore, for patients who are not amenable to surgery, a comprehensive evaluation of their condition and meticulous implementation of a precise pharmacological regimen holds noteworthy clinical significance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) occurs more frequently in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) than methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and can result in comparable morbidity and mortality in the neonatal population. MSSA infection may present as pustulosis or cellulitis and evolve into bacteremia, pneumonia, endocarditis, brain abscesses, and osteomyelitis. There is a paucity of literature regarding the treatment and long-term outcomes in the premature infant. Clinical Findings: A 32-week twin developed MSSA sepsis with presentation of pain, decreased movement of upper extremities, and global hypotonia. Blood cultures remained positive despite antibiotic coverage. Primary Diagnosis: The infant was admitted to the level IV NICU with the diagnosis of MSSA bacteremia, with concern for dissemination and osteomyelitis. Interventions: Diagnostic studies included laboratory testing for sepsis evaluation, radiologic studies to evaluate for dissemination, immunologic testing to rule out complement deficiency, and hematology testing to rule out hypercoagulable conditions. Outcomes: Diagnostic testing showed extensive cellulitis, osteomyelitis, multiple liver abscesses, and epidural abscesses suggestive of spinal epidural abscess (SEA). Abscess debridement and irrigation on the left distal femur, left elbow, and right tibia were performed. The infant completed 8 weeks of IV antibiotic therapy. Immunologic and hematology testing was within normal limits. Practice Recommendations: Prompt recognition and follow-up for clinical signs of sepsis are vital when caring for premature infants. Inclusion of pediatric subspecialist recommendations to assure all diagnostic studies and treatments are completed can significantly impact the patient's outcome. Long-term follow-up is needed for premature infants with the diagnosis of SEA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of using bacteriophage therapeutics in spinal epidural abscess (SEA) by reviewing the causes and outcomes of SEA at a single institution and testing a bacteriophage for activity against preserved SEA clinical isolates. Materials and Methods: Medical records were reviewed of patients that received incision and drainage for SEA at a single medical center. Causative organisms, incidence of coinciding bacteremia and outcomes were recorded. A subset of SEA patients (N = 11), that had preserved clinical isolates, were assessed to evaluate if a bacteriophage therapeutic had ample activity to those isolates as seen with spot tests and growth inhibition assays. Results: Staphylococcus aureus was the predominate bacterial cause (71%) and bacteremia was associated with 96% of S. aureus SEA. Over 50% of the patients either died within three months, had recurrence of their infection, required repeat debridement, or had long term sequalae. A single bacteriophage had positive spot tests for all the S. aureus clinical isolates and inhibited bacterial growth for more than 24 hours for 9 of the 11 (82%) clinical isolates. Conclusion: SEA is associated with significant mortality and morbidity making this a potential indication for adjuvant bacteriophage therapeutics. Since S. aureus is the predominate cause of SEA and most cases are associated bacteremia this creates a potential screening and treatment platform for Staphylococcal bacteriophages therapeutics, allowing for potential pilot studies to be devised. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mortality in patients with spinal epidural abscess (SEA) remains high. Accurate prediction of patient-specific prognosis in SEA can improve patient counseling as well as guide management decisions. There are no externally validated studies predicting short-term mortality in patients with SEA. The purpose of this study was to externally validate the Skeletal Oncology Research Group (SORG) stochastic gradient boosting algorithm for prediction of in-hospital and 90-day postdischarge mortality in SEA. Retrospective, case-control study at a tertiary care academic medical center from 2003 to 2021. Adult patients admitted for radiologically confirmed diagnosis of SEA who did not initiate treatment at an outside institution. In-hospital and 90-day postdischarge mortality. We tested the SORG stochastic gradient boosting algorithm on an independent validation cohort. We assessed its performance with discrimination, calibration, decision curve analysis, and overall performance. A total of 212 patients met inclusion criteria, with a short-term mortality rate of 10.4%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the SORG algorithm when tested on the full validation cohort was 0.82, the calibration intercept was -0.08, the calibration slope was 0.96, and the Brier score was 0.09. With a contemporaneous and geographically distinct independent cohort, we report successful external validation of a machine learning algorithm for prediction of in-hospital and 90-day postdischarge mortality in SEA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rarest form of spinal infections and is characterized by the presence of pus in the space between the dura mater, and the osseoligamentous confines of the vertebral canal. This can cause spinal injury due to direct compression or local ischemia. The major etiology of SEA is bacterial and tuberculous in endemic regions. The incidence of fungal spinal abscess is relatively low and

Background Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is an uncommon clinical entity that is often subject to delayed diagnosis and suboptimal treatment. Untreated disease leads to compression of the spinal cord, resulting in devastating complications. Case Presentation A 56‐year‐old man visited our hospital for progressive lower back and lower extremity pain of several days' duration. Significant pyrexia (39.5°C) and elevated C‐reactive protein (89.2 mg/L) were detected during admission, but no positive neurological examination findings were observed. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed pyogenic discitis at L3–4. Despite the administration of directed antibiotic therapy, the patient's condition rapidly deteriorated, culminating in complete paraplegia secondary to an extensive SEA from L4 to C7. Emergency spinal decompression surgery was canceled due to his poor clinical condition and refusal of informed consent. After further deterioration, he consented to two‐level selective laminectomies and irrigation. Conclusions In contrast with prior case reports, this case illustrates the natural history of an extensive SEA during conservative and late surgical treatment. Early diagnosis and timely surgical decompression are of great importance for extensive SEA.

COVID-19 is currently a major health problem, leading to respiratory, cardiovascular and neurological complications, with additional morbidity and mortality. Spinal infections are rare, representing around 1% of all bone infections and comprising less than 2 per 10,000 of all hospitalizations in tertiary care centers. Spondylodiscitis is a complex disease, with challenging diagnosis and management. We report the case of a 45-year-old man, non-smoker hospitalized for severe COVID-19 disease with respiratory failure. Post-COVID-19, in the 8th week after discharge, he was diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging with spondylodiscitis, but etiology was not confirmed by microbiological investigations. Antibiotics were used, considering the identification of MRSA from cultures of pleural fluid and nasal swab, but surgical intervention was not provided. Clinic, biologic and imagistic were improved, but rehabilitation and long term follow up are necessary. We concluded that spondylodiscitis with spinal abscess is a rare but severe complication post-COVID-19 disease, due to dysbalanced immune response related to the respiratory viral infection, endothelial lesions, hypercoagulation and bacterial superinfection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Mortality at one year is associated with age, mean neutrophil count and congestive heart failure. • There is no association between deprivation status and mortality at one year. • There is no association between rurality and mortality at one year. Spinal epidural abscess are difficult to diagnose due to its non-specific clinical presentation. Spinal epidural abscess is identified late or missed in almost half of patients. To better assist clinicians in making this diagnosis there needs to be a better appreciation of at risk patient profile. We identified all patients who were admitted to a tertiary referral centre with a diagnosis of spinal epidural abscess between February 2009 and January 2022. Demographic details, presentation details, past medical history, concurrent infection, and social factors were recorded for all patients. The primary aim of our study was to examine if there is a relationship between social deprivation and risk of mortality at one year in patients with spinal epidural abscess. There were 140 eligible patients associated with 146 hospital encounters for spinal epidural abscess. Eighteen patients died at ≤365 days post discharge, while 122 patients were alive at >365 days post discharge. There were 86 males and 54 females. The average age was 59.9 years with an IQR of 19.3. There were 28 % Māori, 58 % European and 12 % of all other ethnicities. In the most deprived quantile there were 34.5 %, compared to 7.5 % in the least deprived quantile. Multivariate stepwise regression analysis found that age, mean neutrophil count and congestive heart failure all showed a statistically significance association with mortality at one year. There was no association between one year mortality and these variables: deprivation status, rurality or Māori ethnicity. Mortality at one year appears to be significantly associated with age, mean neutrophil count and congestive heart failure. There was no obvious association between deprivation and mortality at one year. Identifying patients at the greatest risk of mortality remains a complex challenge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: As life expectancy increases worldwide, the elderly population in every country is growing in both the size and proportion. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the microbiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic strategies, and therapeutic approaches to vertebral osteomyelitis, summarizing the latest evidence to guide effective treatment.A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the Medline and Embase databases to identify relevant studies on vertebral osteomyelitis. The search included the following keywords: "vertebral osteomyelitis," "spinal infection," "discitis," "spondylitis," " spondylodiscitis," and "spinal epidural abscess." Both retrospective and prospective studies, case series, and reviews were considered.This condition is commonly caused by bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus or gram-negative bacilli, but can also be caused by other pathogens like fungi and parasites. The onset of vertebral osteomyelitis is insidious, with low specificity in clinical manifestations, often making early diagnosis difficult. Delayed or inadequate treatment may lead to sepsis, permanent neurological damage, or even death. Treatment strategies emphasize the importance of identifying the causative pathogen to guide effective antimicrobial therapy. Current consensus does not advocate for empirical antibiotic treatment unless patients exhibit signs of neurological impairment or severe sepsis. Severe cases involving neurological paralysis, spinal instability, or sepsis may require surgical intervention.Vertebral osteomyelitis requires prompt diagnosis and treatment for a good prognosis. Delayed diagnosis and treatment can lead to permanent neurological deficits or death. Identifying the causative organism is crucial for guiding appropriate antimicrobial therapy. In addition to conservative and surgical treatments, local drug delivery systems offer new approaches to managing spinal osteomyelitis.Methods: As life expectancy increases worldwide, the elderly population in every country is growing in both the size and proportion. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the microbiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic strategies, and therapeutic approaches to vertebral osteomyelitis, summarizing the latest evidence to guide effective treatment.A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the Medline and Embase databases to identify relevant studies on vertebral osteomyelitis. The search included the following keywords: "vertebral osteomyelitis," "spinal infection," "discitis," "spondylitis," " spondylodiscitis," and "spinal epidural abscess." Both retrospective and prospective studies, case series, and reviews were considered.This condition is commonly caused by bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus or gram-negative bacilli, but can also be caused by other pathogens like fungi and parasites. The onset of vertebral osteomyelitis is insidious, with low specificity in clinical manifestations, often making early diagnosis difficult. Delayed or inadequate treatment may lead to sepsis, permanent neurological damage, or even death. Treatment strategies emphasize the importance of identifying the causative pathogen to guide effective antimicrobial therapy. Current consensus does not advocate for empirical antibiotic treatment unless patients exhibit signs of neurological impairment or severe sepsis. Severe cases involving neurological paralysis, spinal instability, or sepsis may require surgical intervention.Vertebral osteomyelitis requires prompt diagnosis and treatment for a good prognosis. Delayed diagnosis and treatment can lead to permanent neurological deficits or death. Identifying the causative organism is crucial for guiding appropriate antimicrobial therapy. In addition to conservative and surgical treatments, local drug delivery systems offer new approaches to managing spinal osteomyelitis.Results: As life expectancy increases worldwide, the elderly population in every country is growing in both the size and proportion. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the microbiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic strategies, and therapeutic approaches to vertebral osteomyelitis, summarizing the latest evidence to guide effective treatment.A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the Medline and Embase databases to identify relevant studies on vertebral osteomyelitis. The search included the following keywords: "vertebral osteomyelitis," "spinal infection," "discitis," "spondylitis," " spondylodiscitis," and "spinal epidural abscess." Both retrospective and prospective studies, case series, and reviews were considered.This condition is commonly caused by bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus or gram-negative bacilli, but can also be caused by other pathogens like fungi and parasites. The onset of vertebral osteomyelitis is insidious, with low specificity in clinical manifestations, often making early diagnosis difficult. Delayed or inadequate treatment may lead to sepsis, permanent neurological damage, or even death. Treatment strategies emphasize the importance of identifying the causative pathogen to guide effective antimicrobial therapy. Current consensus does not advocate for empirical antibiotic treatment unless patients exhibit signs of neurological impairment or severe sepsis. Severe cases involving neurological paralysis, spinal instability, or sepsis may require surgical intervention.Vertebral osteomyelitis requires prompt diagnosis and treatment for a good prognosis. Delayed diagnosis and treatment can lead to permanent neurological deficits or death. Identifying the causative organism is crucial for guiding appropriate antimicrobial therapy. In addition to conservative and surgical treatments, local drug delivery systems offer new approaches to managing spinal osteomyelitis.Conclusion: As life expectancy increases worldwide, the elderly population in every country is growing in both the size and proportion. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the microbiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic strategies, and therapeutic approaches to vertebral osteomyelitis, summarizing the latest evidence to guide effective treatment.A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the Medline and Embase databases to identify relevant studies on vertebral osteomyelitis. The search included the following keywords: "vertebral osteomyelitis," "spinal infection," "discitis," "spondylitis," " spondylodiscitis," and "spinal epidural abscess." Both retrospective and prospective studies, case series, and reviews were considered.This condition is commonly caused by bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus or gram-negative bacilli, but can also be caused by other pathogens like fungi and parasites. The onset of vertebral osteomyelitis is insidious, with low specificity in clinical manifestations, often making early diagnosis difficult. Delayed or inadequate treatment may lead to sepsis, permanent neurological damage, or even death. Treatment strategies emphasize the importance of identifying the causative pathogen to guide effective antimicrobial therapy. Current consensus does not advocate for empirical antibiotic treatment unless patients exhibit signs of neurological impairment or severe sepsis. Severe cases involving neurological paralysis, spinal instability, or sepsis may require surgical intervention.Vertebral osteomyelitis requires prompt diagnosis and treatment for a good prognosis. Delayed diagnosis and treatment can lead to permanent neurological deficits or death. Identifying the causative organism is crucial for guiding appropriate antimicrobial therapy. In addition to conservative and surgical treatments, local drug delivery systems offer new approaches to managing spinal osteomyelitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) and spinal epidural abscess (SEA) are known as mimics of each other because they present with flaccid paralysis following an infection; however, they differ in the main causative bacteria. Nevertheless, the two diseases can occur simultaneously if there is a preceding Campylobacter infection. Here, we report the first case of SEA with GBS following Campylobacter coli infection. Case presentation A 71-year-old Japanese man presented with progressive back pain and paralysis of the lower limbs following enteritis. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a lumbar epidural abscess that required surgical decompression; therefore, surgical drainage was performed. Blood cultures revealed the presence of C. coli. Despite surgery, the paralysis progressed to the extremities. Nerve conduction studies led to the diagnosis of GBS. Anti-ganglioside antibodies in the patient suggested that GBS was preceded by Campylobacter infection. Intravascular immunoglobulin therapy attenuated the progression of the paralysis. Conclusions We report a case of SEA and GBS following Campylobacter infection. A combination of the two diseases is rare; however, it could occur if the preceding infection is caused by Campylobacter spp. If a cause is known but the patient does not respond to the corresponding treatment, it is important to reconsider the diagnosis based on the medical history.

Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is an abscess that forms between the dura mater and vertebrae. SEA is characterized by back pain and neuropathy associated with fever, of which early diagnosis and treatment are necessary to avoid irreversible neurological sequelae. However, its diagnosis is often difficult because specific symptoms are rarely present in the early stages of the disease. A 25-month-old boy, healthy by nature and free of risk factors, was referred and admitted for fever symptoms only, without back pain or neurological symptoms. We focused on the residual activation of the coagulation-fibrinolytic system, which was contrary to the response to therapy, and were able to establish a diagnosis of SEA. After the initiation of antibiotics, the patient responded well to treatment and made a mild recovery without the need for surgical intervention. To date, there are no reported cases of SEA with only febrile symptoms without localized spinal cord tenderness. SEA is easily overlooked and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of pediatric fever of unknown origin. Although imaging studies have drawbacks, such as radiation exposure and sedation, they should be immediately performed if SEA is suspected.

While spinal epidural abscess is a well described disease process, this condition is rarely caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. This case describes a case of spinal epidural abscess secondary to S. pneumoniae in an otherwise healthy, immunocompetent 61-year-old female without a history of spinal procedures, obvious source of hematogenous seeding, or clear risk factors for invasive pneumococcal infection. She was treated with IV and oral antibiotic therapy and made a full recovery.

Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rarest form of spinal infections and is characterized by the presence of pus in the space between the dura mater, and the osseoligamentous confines of the vertebral canal. This can cause spinal injury due to direct compression or local ischemia. The major etiology of SEA is bacterial and tuberculous in endemic regions. The incidence of fungal spinal abscess is relatively low and <5% of SEA is attributable to fungi. We, here, report a case of 77-year-old known patient of chronic renal disease on hemodialysis that presented with low-back pain for 15 days and was subsequently diagnosed with SEA by magnetic resonance imaging, and causative organism was identified as Candida by culture. The abscess was surgically drained after laminectomy. The patient improved with surgery and antifungal treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Context: Spinal epidural abscess is a rare but severe condition with high rates of postoperative adverse events.Purpose: The objective of the study was to identify independent prognostic factors for reoperation using two datasets: an institutional and national database.Study Design/setting: Retrospective Review.Patient Sample: Database 1: Review of five medical centers from 1993 to 2016. Database 2: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) was queried between 2012 and 2016.Outcome Measures: Thirty-day and ninety-day reoperation rate.Methods: Two independent datasets were reviewed to identify patients with spinal epidural abscesses undergoing spinal surgery. Multivariate analyses were used to determine independent prognostic factors for reoperation while including factors identified in bivariate analyses.Results: Overall, 642 patients underwent surgery for a spinal epidural abscess in the institutional cohort, with a 90-day unplanned reoperation rate of 19.9%. In the NSQIP database, 951 patients were identified with a 30-day unplanned reoperation rate of 12.3%. On multivariate analysis in the NSQIP database, cervical spine abscess was the only factor that reached significance for 30-day reoperation (OR=1.71, 95% CI=1.11-2.63, p=.02, Area under the curve (AUC)=0.61). On multivariate analysis in the institutional cohort, independent prognostic factors for 30-day reoperation were: preoperative urinary incontinence, ventral location of abscess relative to thecal sac, cervical abscess, preoperative wound infection, and leukocytosis (AUC=0.65). Ninety-day reoperation rate also found hypoalbuminemia as a significant predictor (AUC=0.66).Conclusion: Six novel independent prognostic factors were identified for 90-day reoperation after surgery for a spinal epidural abscess. The multivariable analysis fairly predicts reoperation, indicating that there may be additional factors that need to be uncovered in future studies. The risk factors delineated in this study through the use of two large cohorts of spinal epidural abscess patients can be used to improve preoperative risk stratification and patient management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundSpinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare purulent infection of the central nervous system. Abscesses confined to the spinal canal can compress the spinal cord, causing nerve damage and even death in severe cases (1). Prompt diagnosis and treatment can relieve symptoms and prevent complications. To increase awareness of this rare disease, we report a case of a 58-year-old man with a cervical spinal epidural abscess combined with a soft tissue abscess in the neck and describe its clinical course, imaging feature, pathology, treatment, and patient prognosis.Case descriptionA 58-year-old male Chinese patient was admitted to our hospital because of neck pain for 2 months, which worsened for 4 days. On the third day of admission, the muscle strength of the limbs decreased, and MRI of the spinal cord showed abnormal signal shadows in the spinal canal at the C1-C7 level and in the surrounding soft tissue on the right side of spine, suggesting the possibility of inflammatory lesions with local abscess formation. We immediately performed decompression of the spinal canal on the patient and performed incision and drainage of the cervical abscess. During the operation, we found a large amount of pus in the epidural space of the spinal canal, and there was a fistula between the cervical abscess and the epidural abscess of the spinal canal. The patient underwent continuous drainage and anti-infective treatment with sensitive antibiotics after operation. No recurrence of the abscess was observed and the patient recovered well.ConclusionEarly diagnosis is the key to the treatment of SEA, so radiologists and neurosurgeons need to strengthen their understanding of this rare disease to avoid misdiagnosis. For SEA with definite diagnosis, decompression surgery should be performed in a timely manner when symptoms of nerve compression occur, continuous drainage should be performed after surgery, and sensitive antibiotics should be used for anti-infective treatment.

Background: Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is an uncommon clinical entity that is often subject to delayed diagnosis and suboptimal treatment. Untreated disease leads to compression of the spinal cord, resulting in devastating complications. Case Presentation: A 56‐year‐old man visited our hospital for progressive lower back and lower extremity pain of several days' duration. Significant pyrexia (39.5°C) and elevated C‐reactive protein (89.2 mg/L) were detected during admission, but no positive neurological examination findings were observed. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed pyogenic discitis at L3–4. Despite the administration of directed antibiotic therapy, the patient's condition rapidly deteriorated, culminating in complete paraplegia secondary to an extensive SEA from L4 to C7. Emergency spinal decompression surgery was canceled due to his poor clinical condition and refusal of informed consent. After further deterioration, he consented to two‐level selective laminectomies and irrigation. Conclusions: In contrast with prior case reports, this case illustrates the natural history of an extensive SEA during conservative and late surgical treatment. Early diagnosis and timely surgical decompression are of great importance for extensive SEA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The patient is a 56-year-old male admitted to the hospital for generalized weakness and fever. He was treated in hospital for 10 days due to COVID-19. He did not receive any immunosuppressive therapy during admission. One day after his discharge he experienced back pain and received analgesic therapy for 10 days. About one month later he experienced severe back pain and gross hematuria. He was admitted to hospital with acute kidney injury and new-onset lower extremity muscle weakness. His renal biopsy revealed IgA nephropathy and thoracic/cervical/lumbar-spine imaging showed an epidural abscess. This is a unique case report of a patient developing an epidural abscess and acute kidney injury together as a serious complication of COVID-19 infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Disseminated gonococcal infection (DGI) is an uncommon complication of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection, and typically presents with either a triad of tenosynovitis, dermatitis and polyarthralgia, or with extra-axial large joint septic arthritis. Spinal epidural abscess is a rare manifestation of DGI, with only a few previously reported cases, none of which required placement of metalware into the infected space. Here we report a severe case of isolated N. gonorrhoeae cervical spine epidural abscess necessitating surgical source control (C7/T1 laminectomy and debridement) and metalware placement (C6-T2 posterior instrumented fusion). The case was successfully managed by a combination of surgical intervention followed by six weeks of predominantly oral, targeted antimicrobial therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for intractable pain syndromes has become a pillar of modern pain management. Common complications include lead migration, implant infection, cerebral spinal fluid leak, and lead fracture. Spinal epidural abscess due to spinal cord stimulator implantation is a very rare occurrence with only two cases reported in the literature so far. We present an illustrative case and discuss the pathophysiology and best clinical management for this very rate entity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aspergillus spinal epidural abscess (ASEA) is a rare entity that may mimic Pott's paraplegia as it commonly affects immunocompromised patients. We present one institutional case of ASEA with concomitant review of the literature. A 58-year-old female presented with intermittent low back pain for 10 years recently aggravated and with concurrent spastic paraparesis, fever, and weight loss. Emergent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed T11-T12 epidural abscess with discitis and osteomyelitis. After empirical treatment with antibiotics, computed tomography-guided, percutaneous biopsy with drainage was performed, showing granulomatous tubercular-like collection. Antitubercular therapy was initiated, but after 1 month, the patient's condition deteriorated. Repeat MRI showed growth of the spinal epidural abscess with significant cord compression and vertebral osteomyelitis. T11-T12 laminectomy and tissue removal were performed with a posterior midline approach. Tissue histopathology showed necrotic debris colonies of Aspergillus spp. Antifungal therapy was started, and the patient rapidly improved. ASEA may mimic Pott's disease at imaging, leading to immediate start of antitubercular treatment without prior biopsy, leading to severe worsening of patients' clinical status. Cases of ASEA should be considered at pretreatment planning, opting for biopsy confirmation before treatment initiation so to prevent the occurrence of fatal infection-related complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for intractable pain syndromes has become a pillar of modern pain management. Common complications include lead migration, implant infection, cerebral spinal fluid leak, and lead fracture. Spinal epidural abscess due to spinal cord stimulator implantation is a very rare occurrence with only two cases reported in the literature so far. We present an illustrative case and discuss the pathophysiology and best clinical management for this very rate entity.

Spontaneous spinal epidural abscess is a rare and life-threatening neurological condition that calls for early recognition followed by immediate surgery for decompression within 24 h from the onset of the neurological symptoms, to expect a complete recovery of the patient. When the patient is admitted with a severe neurological deficit, surgery for decompression and accuracy of the diagnosis is required without delay. We report a case of a 34-year-old man who was admitted, with sudden onset of paraplegia complicated within 72 h by cauda equina syndrome on a spontaneous spinal epidural abscess at T11-T12 level. He immediately underwent surgery for the evacuation of the compressive spinal lesion by laminectomy of T11 and T12 and begins to recover from the neurological deficit in the post-operative period. Timely decision-making toward the surgery is the key factor to guaranty a patient’s better outcome for the spontaneous epidural compressive abscess.

Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a very serious infection of the central nervous system (CNS). It is of very low incidence with a peak age in the geriatric age group. Immunocompromised patients are more susceptible to SEA. It can present with significant neurological deficits, which can be permanent if not identified and treated promptly. In this case report, a 75‑year‑old immunocompromised patient presented with progressive spastic quadriparesis and septicemia. He was diagnosed with a case of cervical spinal epidural abscess with underlying cord compression. Anterior retropharyngeal approach and button‑hole disco‑osteotomy of C5–C6 was performed and the cervical SEA was drained, followed by antibiotic saline irrigation (cranially and caudally) was done, total duration of surgery was 70 min. At the time of discharge (7th postoperative day), the patient improved neurologically and sepsis had resolved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare but serious condition that carries with it a high rate of morbidity and mortality.Objective: This review highlights the pearls and pitfalls of SEA, including presentation, initial evaluation, and management in the emergency department (ED) based on current evidence.Discussion: SEA is a suppurative infection and infectious disease emergency that may result in significant morbidity and even mortality. It is a challenging diagnosis due to its range of risk factors and variety of presentations with up to 90% of patients misdiagnosed on their first ED visit. Factors associated with increased risk of SEA include immunocompromise, bacteremia, contiguous infection (e.g., psoas muscle abscess, osteomyelitis, skin infection), and spinal instrumentation. However, the absence of risk factors cannot be used to exclude SEA. The classic triad of back pain, fever, and neurologic deficit occurs in less than 8% of cases, though back pain is a common presenting symptom. Up to half of patients experience a neurologic abnormality, but fever is absent in 50%. Laboratory assessment may assist with inflammatory markers elevated in the majority of cases. Diagnosis includes magnetic resonance imaging with and without contrast and blood cultures, and management includes spinal specialist consultation and antibiotic therapy.Conclusions: An understanding of SEA can assist emergency clinicians in diagnosing and managing this potentially deadly disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This series reviews three cases of back pain where a highly morbid diagnosis was missed by an emergency physician and subsequently successfully litigated. Case Report: We review the clinical entities of spinal epidural abscess and cauda equina syndrome, challenging diagnoses that can be easily missed and lead to patient harm if not treated promptly. Here we offer suggestions for recognizing these conditions quickly, performing an adequate history and exam, and using documentation to support decision-making. Conclusion: When confronted with an unfortunate medical outcome, maintaining honesty is of paramount importance in medical-legal environments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and spinal epidural abscess (SEA) are known as mimics of each other because they present with flaccid paralysis following an infection; however, they differ in the main causative bacteria. Nevertheless, the two diseases can occur simultaneously if there is a preceding Campylobacter infection. Here, we report the first case of SEA with GBS following Campylobacter coli infection.Case Presentation: A 71-year-old Japanese man presented with progressive back pain and paralysis of the lower limbs following enteritis. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a lumbar epidural abscess that required surgical decompression; therefore, surgical drainage was performed. Blood cultures revealed the presence of C. coli. Despite surgery, the paralysis progressed to the extremities. Nerve conduction studies led to the diagnosis of GBS. Anti-ganglioside antibodies in the patient suggested that GBS was preceded by Campylobacter infection. Intravascular immunoglobulin therapy attenuated the progression of the paralysis.Conclusions: We report a case of SEA and GBS following Campylobacter infection. A combination of the two diseases is rare; however, it could occur if the preceding infection is caused by Campylobacter spp. If a cause is known but the patient does not respond to the corresponding treatment, it is important to reconsider the diagnosis based on the medical history. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in diagnostic medicine, early recognition of SEAs remains elusive. The vague presentation of the disease, coupled with its numerous risk factors, the diagnostic requirement for obtaining advanced imaging, and the necessity of specialized care constitute extraordinary challenges to both diagnosis and treatment of SEA. Once diagnosed, SEAs require urgent or emergent medical and/or surgical management. As SEAs are a relatively rare pathology, high-quality data are limited and there is no consensus on their optimal management. This paper focuses on presenting the treatment modalities that have been successful in the management of SEAs and providing a critical assessment of how specific SEA characteristics may render one infection more amenable to primary surgical or medical interventions. This paper reviews the relevant history, epidemiology, clinical presentation, radiology, microbiology, and treatment of SEAs and concludes by addressing the medicolegal implications of delayed treatment of the disease.