Search

Jan Astermark,1 Piotr Wojciechowski,2 Samuel Aballéa,3 Zalmai Hakimi,4 Jameel Nazir,4 Robert Klamroth5 1Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, and Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; 2Creativ-Ceutical, Krakow, Poland; 3Creativ-Ceutical, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; 4Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB, Stockholm, Sweden; 5Department of Internal Medicine, Hemophilia Treatment Centre, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, GermanyCorrespondence: Robert Klamroth Email robert.klamroth@vivantes.dePurpose: In patients with hemophilia B, treatment with extended half-life (EHL) recombinant factor IX allows for longer dosing intervals while providing equal or superior bleeding protection compared with standard half-life products. This enables flexible, individualized treatment schedules, which reduce the burden of prophylaxis and improve patient outcomes. This analysis compared the efficacy of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) and recombinant factor IX albumin fusion protein (rIX-FP), two EHL therapies approved for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding in hemophilia B.Patients and Methods: Matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison (MAIC) was used to adjust the between-treatment differences in baseline characteristics. Individual patient data for rFIXFc (B-LONG) were matched to aggregated data for rIX-FP (PROLONG-9FP) followed by statistical comparison for estimated annualized bleeding rate (ABR) using a Poisson regression model with adjustment for over dispersion. Data were analyzed according to treatment regimen prior to study entry: prior prophylaxis (rFIXFc, n=48; rIX-FP, n=40) or prior episodic treatment (n=43 and n=19, respectively). Relative treatment effects are presented as incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).Results: After adjustment for baseline characteristics, estimated ABR observed for rFIXFc and rIX-FP was not significantly different in patients on prior prophylaxis (1.87 versus 1.58; IRR 1.18, 95% CI 0.67– 2.10) or prior episodic (2.25 versus 2.22; IRR 1.01 95% CI 0.40– 2.57) regimens.Conclusion: This MAIC analysis shows that the estimated ABR for rFIXFc-treated patients from B-LONG was similar to that of rIX-FP-treated patients from PROLONG-9FP and, therefore, indicates that the two EHL therapies provide similar efficacy when used as prophylaxis for patients with hemophilia B. Trough levels differ between the two products (1– 3% [targeted] versus 20% [observed], respectively), suggesting that trough level is not a surrogate indicator when ABR is used as a criterion for clinical efficacy when comparing these FIX products in hemophilia B.Keywords: annualized bleeding rate, comparative effectiveness research, factor IX deficiency, factor IX Fc fusion protein, rIX-FP fusion protein, treatment outcome

Objective: An extended half-life factor IX (FIX) fusion protein linking recombinant FIX with recombinant human albumin (rIX-FP), indicated for the treatment of hemophilia B, was approved by the European Medicines Agency in May 2016. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes and drug utilization in patients who switched from prior FIX therapies to rIX-FP.Methods: Anonymized patient chart data were collected from German institutions treating patients with hemophilia B. Patients were included if they had been treated with rIX-FP for ≥8 weeks at the time of data collection. Bleeding rates and FIX consumption were compared between rIX-FP and patients' prior FIX products.Results: Data were obtained for 81 male patients treated with rIX-FP, including 59 who received prophylaxis with both their prior drug and rIX-FP (prophylaxis-to-prophylaxis group). Mean factor consumption in this group was 44.2 IU/kg/wk for rIX-FP compared with 82.3 IU/kg/wk for all prior FIX products. In addition, intra-patient analysis of factor consumption showed lower consumption of rIX-FP compared with prior FIX in 56 of 59 patients. Among the patients for whom bleed data were available (n = 42), annualized bleeding rate decreased from a mean (standard deviation) of 2.6 ± 2.9 on prior product to 0.3 ± 0.6 on rIX-FP. The proportion of patients with zero bleeds increased from 24% with prior therapy to 81% with rIX-FP.Conclusion: rIX-FP was associated with substantial reductions in bleeding rates and consumption of FIX compared with standard half-life products that require more frequent administration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]