Search

Although the coin has changed in shape, weight, value and composition since the first times of its use, its use in shopping has never changed until today. In the study, 49 coins belonging to the Ottoman Period in the Ordu Ethnography Museum were examined. Coins to the museum; 18 came with grant, 19 with purchase and 12 with confiscation, and all of the coins are in the warehouse. Coins; II. Mehmed III. Ahmed, Mahmud I, III. Mustafa, III. Selim, II. Mahmud, Abdulmecid, Abdulaziz, II Abdülhamid and V Mehmed Reşad it includes 10 sultans, including. On the coins, the sultan's tag, his tughra, his title, the place of the minting, the date of the mint and the sentence of prayer are included. 6 of the coins were minted from copper, 31 of them were silver, and 12 of them were nickel, and there is no gold coin. 12 of the coins were minted with hammer technique, 12 by mechanical pressing and 25 by automatic coin presses. Study; It was made in order to reveal the dominance of the Ottoman Period in the region with the iconography, material and decoration of the coins, to introduce the coins to the numismatic environment and to contribute to the coin literature. In addition, it is thought that due to the writing and decoration features on the coins, it will be a source for other sciences, especially art history. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a hoard of coins of 15th-16th centuries stored in the collection of Local Lore Museum in Vylkove (Kilia raion, Odesa oblast, Ukraine). It was found in vicinity of Vylkove, in the eastern part of Kilia raion or southern part of Tatarbunary raion. 2 Hungarian denarii (of Vladislav II), 1 Crimean akçe (of Sahib Giray) and 58 Ottoman akçes (of Bayezid II, Selim I and Süleiman I), including 1 akçe that can probably be an imitation, are presented in composition of the hoard. The latest coin is an akçe of Süleiman I, minted in Mudava, probably dated to the last year of this sultan’s reign (1566). However, there are 2 very worn akçes in its composition, that can be attributed either to Süleiman I, or to Selim II. Thus the period of tesauration might be placed during the reign of Selim II (1566-1574). In this case, the circumstances of hiding of this hoard could be connected with the war of John III the Brave against the Ottoman army, the final battle of which took place in Budjak, near the Lake Kahul, in 1574. Nevertheless, it is not necessary to connect this hoard with any military actions in the region.

Copyright of Osmanlı Araştırmaları is the property of Turkiye Diyanet Foundation Centre for Islamic Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Theatralia is the property of Masaryk University, Faculty of Arts and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The author introduces into the scientific circulation the coins, which were registered during the second half of 2016 and the first half of 2017. Most of them were discovered as a result of archaeological excavations, and some coins were brought to the National Museum of History of Moldova to attribute them. The earliest of the antique coins are several specimens of drachmae from Istros, the place of which finding is unknown, as well as the golden stater of Mithridates VI Eupator (120-63 BC), minted in Callatis. Into the Chronicle there are also included 9 coins of the Roman period. Among them is the denarius of Trajan (98-117 AD), dated between 114-117, which was found in the village of Cobîlea of the Şoldăneşti District, and two coins of the times of Septimius Severus, one of which was minted in Tiras. Medieval finds are represented by coins found during excavations at the 17th century church in the village of Căuşeni, near the Soroca Fortress, during the rescue excavations in the territory of Old Orhei, etc.

Copyright of Journal of Art History / Sanat Tarihi Dergisi is the property of Ege University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Tyragetia is the property of National Museum of History of Moldova and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Sociologie musí v principu odpovědět na Simmelovu otázku: „Jak je společnost vůbec možná“. Kazdou sociologickou – empirickou či teoretickou - výpověď je možno považovat za jeden z elementu možné odpovědi. Sociologické teorie nabízejí modely, kterými empirická zjištění získávají systematickou souvislost. Tyto modely musí ovšem zohlednit fakt, ze jimi prezentované souvislosti nejsou pouze vědeckými konstrukty, nýbrž i konstrukcemi každodenních aktérů, tedy konstrukty řídícími společnost již před vstupem vědy do ní. Sociologická teorie, jakož i sociologie v celku, si tedy musí být vědoma toho, ze vždy zůstává částí svého předmětu. To představuje jeden z jejích hlavních metodologických problémů. Sociologické teorie musí tedy odpovídat na základní otázky, týkající se konstrukce/konstituce sociálního řádu: 1. jak se orientuje sociální jednání; 2. v jakých procesech tato orientace vznikla, 3. jakými institucemi je tato orientace stabilizována a reprodukována; 4. co jsou faktory změny těchto struktur. To, kterou z těchto otázek sociologické teorie považují za výchozí, představuje jejich základní teoretické rozhodnutí, ovlivňující jejich další výstavbu a modelování společenských souvislostí. To, zdali sociologické výpovědi vůbec odpovídají na některé z těchto otázek s úmyslem ukázat jejich vzájemné propojeni a systematickou souvislost, pak odlišuje teorie od ostatních sociologických narativů.

Copyright of Itobiad: Journal of the Human & Social Science Researches / İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi is the property of Itobiad: Journal of the Human & Social Science Researches and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)