Search

Moon Hee Lee,1 Seok-Kyu Yoon,1 Hyungsub Kim,2 Yong-Soon Cho,3 Sungpil Han,4 Shi Hyang Lee,1 Kyun-Seop Bae,1 Jina Jung,5 Sung Hee Hong,5 Hyeong-Seok Lim1 1Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea; 2Department of Emergency Medical Services, College of Health Sciences, Eulji University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea; 3Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea; 4Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea; 5Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Seoul, Republic of KoreaCorrespondence: Hyeong-Seok Lim, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea, Tel +82-2-3010-4613, Fax +82-2-3010-4623, Email mdlhs@amc.seoul.krPurpose: The combined administration of bazedoxifene, a tissue-selective estrogen receptor modulator, and cholecalciferol can be a promising therapeutic option for postmenopausal osteoporosis patients. This study aimed to examine the pharmacokinetic interactions between these two drugs and the tolerability of their combined administration in healthy male subjects.Patients and Methods: Thirty male volunteers were randomly assigned to one of the six sequences comprised of three treatments: bazedoxifene 20 mg monotherapy, cholecalciferol 1600 IU monotherapy, and combined bazedoxifene and cholecalciferol therapy. For each treatment, a single dose of the investigational drug(s) was administered orally, and serial blood samples were collected to measure the plasma concentrations of bazedoxifene and cholecalciferol. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using the non-compartmental method. The point estimate and 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) were obtained to compare the exposures of combined therapy and monotherapy. The pharmacokinetic parameters compared were the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast). The safety and tolerability of the combined therapy were assessed in terms of the frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs).Results: For bazedoxifene, the GMR (90% CI) of the combined therapy to monotherapy was 1.044 (0.9263– 1.1765) for Cmax and 1.1329 (1.0232– 1.2544) for AUClast. For baseline-adjusted cholecalciferol, the GMR (90% CI) of the combined therapy to monotherapy was 0.8543 (0.8005– 0.9117) for Cmax and 0.8056 (0.7445– 0.8717) for AUClast. The frequency of AEs observed was not significantly different between the combined therapy and monotherapy, and their severity was mild in all cases.Conclusion: A mild degree of pharmacokinetic interaction was observed when bazedoxifene and cholecalciferol were administered concomitantly to healthy male volunteers. This combined therapy was well tolerated at the dose levels used in the present study.Keywords: bazedoxifene, cholecalciferol, drug-drug interaction, pharmacokinetics, tolerability

Seok Kyu Yoon,1 Kyun-Seop Bae,1 Dong Hyun Hong,2 Seong Su Kim,2 Young Kweon Choi,2 Hyeong-Seok Lim1 1Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; 2Department of Pharmaceutical Research, iCure Pharmaceutical Incorporated, Seoul, Republic of KoreaCorrespondence: Hyeong-Seok LimDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Songpa-Gu, Seoul Tel +82-2-3010-4623Fax +82-2-3010-4622Email mdlhs@amc.seoul.krIntroduction: This study characterized the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of a donepezil patch formulation currently under development, using mixed effect modeling analysis, and explored optimal patch dosing regimens in comparison with the donepezil oral formulation.Methods: PK data used in this analysis were from 60 healthy Korean male subjects participating in two Phase I studies, where subjects received single or multiple doses of donepezil of 43.75, 87.5, and 175 mg via patches, and 12 of them received a single oral dose of 10 mg of donepezil, followed by a single dose of donepezil via a patch. Donepezil PKs were analyzed by nonlinear mixed effect modeling using NONMEM software.Results: A well-stirred model with two-compartment distribution and delayed absorption was chosen as the best model for the oral formulation. The PKs of donepezil after the patch applications were best described by a two-compartment linear model with zero-order absorption (D2) and absorption delay. The relative bioavailability (BA) of donepezil after the patch application compared with oral dosing was described to be affected by the duration of patch application.Conclusion: PK simulations based on the chosen PK models suggested that, overall, donepezil exposure in plasma is similar whether with 10 mg of oral donepezil every 24 h or a 175 mg patch every 72 h, and likewise with 5 mg of oral donepezil every 24 h or an 87.5 mg patch every 72 h.Keywords: clinical trial(s), clinical trial simulation(s), pharmacokinetics, pharmacometrics, analysis

The purpose of this study was to determine the therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency ablation for treating renal VX2 tumors with and without renal artery occlusion in a rabbit model. Twenty-four New Zealand White rabbits were percutaneously implanted with renal VX2 tumors. Fifteen days after implantation, both kidneys were surgically exposed, and radiofrequency ablation was conducted. Group A (n=12) was treated with renal artery occlusion, and group B (n=12) was treated without occlusion. In each rabbit, the serum creatinine was measured to evaluate renal damage after arterial occlusion. Two days after radiofrequency ablation, computed tomography was performed to evaluate the difference in therapeutic results between the two groups. We also compared histopathologic findings after radiofrequency ablation. The mean tumor size was 2.4 cm (range, 1.2-3.1 cm). Radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors was technically feasible in all cases. Complete ablation was achieved in 11 of the 12 rabbits (92%) in group A but in only eight of the 12 rabbits (67%) in group B (P<0.05). The average time of radiofrequency application was shorter in group A (mean, 547 s) than in group B (mean, 826 s) (P<0.05). After radiofrequency ablation, the serum creatinine increased from 1.54 to 1.82 mg/dl in group A and from 1.46 to 1.78 mg/dl in group B. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). In conclusion, radiofrequency ablation with renal artery occlusion can decrease the duration of treatment and increase the therapeutic efficacy for renal VX2 tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The objectives of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for small non-resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and SBRT combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for advanced HCC with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).Methods: Thirty one patients with HCC who were treated with SBRT were used for the study. We studied 32 HCC lesions, where 23 lesions (22 patients) were treated targeting small non-resectable primary HCC, and 9 lesions (9 patients) targeting PVTT using the Cyberknife. All the 9 patients targeting PVTT received TACE for the advanced HCC. Tumor volume was 3.6-57.3 cc (median, 25.2 cc) and SBRT dose was 30-39 Gy (median, 36 Gy) in 3 fractions for consecutive days for 70-85% of the planned target volume.Results: The median follow up was 10.5 months. The overall response rate was 71.9% [small HCC: 82.6% (19/23), advanced HCC with PVTT: 44.4% (4/9)], with the complete and partial response rates of 31.3% [small HCC: 26.1% (6/23), advanced HCC with PVTT: 11.1% (1/9)], and 50.0% [small HCC: 56.5% (13/23), advanced HCC with PVTT: 33.3% (3/9)], respectively. The median survival period of small HCC and advanced HCC with PVTT patients was 12 months and 8 months, respectively. No patient experienced Grade 4 toxicity.Conclusion: SBRT for small HCC and SBRT combined with TACE for advanced HCC with PVTT showed feasible treatment modalities with minimal side effects in selected patients with primary HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

CD133 is a cancer stem-cell (CSC) marker associated with radioresistance and chemoresistance in various cancers. In the present study, CD133-expressing liver cancer cells following radiation exposure showed higher activation of MAPK/PI3K signaling pathway and reduction in reactive oxygen species levels compared to CD133- cells. The in vivo study with a xenograft model showed increased tumor formation in irradiated CD133+ cell-injected nude mice compared to the CD133- group, suggesting that CD133 contributes to radioresistance in HCC. Therefore, CD133-expressing liver cancer cells have anti-apoptotic and radioresistance properties that may be useful to improve anti-cancer treatments, including chemotherapy/radiotherapy of HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]