Search

Objectives ANA-associated rheumatic and musculoskeletal (MSK) diseases (RMDs) [SLE, primary SS (pSS), scleroderma, inflammatory myositis, MCTD and UCTD] make up a disease spectrum with overlapping clinical and immunological features. MSK inflammation is common and impactful across ANA-associated RMDs. The objectives of this study were to evaluate MSK inflammation (ANA-associated arthritis) prevalence in a multidisease ANA-associated RMD study, assess its clinical impact across ANA-associated RMD diagnoses, propose new basket groupings of patients, and evaluate immunological profiles in legacy and new basket contexts. Methods An observational study enrolled patients with ANA-associated RMDs. Demographic variables, comorbidities, therapies, disease activity instruments [BILAG, SLEDAI, the EULAR SS disease activity index (ESSDAI), physician visual analogue scale (VAS)], patient-reported outcomes [SF36, FACIT-Fatigue, EQ5D, ICECAP-A, Work Productivity and Activity impairment (WPAI), patient VAS] and the biomarker profile (six-gene expression scores, flow cytometry, autoantibody profile) were analysed. Reclustering utilized Gaussian mixture modelling (GMM). The clinical and immune features of new and legacy clusters were compared. Results Inflammatory MSK symptoms were prevalent across ANA-associated RMDs, in 213/294 patients. In ANA-associated arthritis patients, most variables did not differ between diagnoses, with the exception of the EQ5D-5L index and mobility domains (lower in MCTD/pSS, both P  < 0.05). FM and OA prevalence were similar across diagnoses. Therapy use differed significantly, the use of biologics being greatest in SLE (P  < 0.05). GMM yielded two multidisease clusters: High MSK disease activity (n  = 89) and low MSK disease activity (n  = 124). The high MSK disease activity cluster included all patients with active joint swelling, and they had significantly higher prednisolone usage, physician global assessment (PGA), Sm/RNP/SmRNP/chromatin positivity, Tetherin mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), and IFN Score-A activity, along with numerically lower FM and OA prevalence. Conclusion We defined ANA-associated arthritis, a more clinically and immunologically homogeneous population than existing RMD populations for trials, and a more prevalent population for therapies in the clinic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glucocorticoids (GCs) have revolutionized the management of SLE, providing patients with rapid symptomatic relief and preventing flares when maintained at low dosages. However, there are increasing concerns over GC-associated adverse effects and organ damage, which decrease patients' quality of life (QOL) and increase healthcare costs. This highlights the need to balance effective GC use and minimize toxicity in patients with SLE. Herein, we provide an overview of the theoretical considerations and clinical evidence, in addition to the variations and similarities across nine national and eight international recommendations regarding the use of GCs across SLE manifestations and how these compare with real-world usage. In line with this, we propose possible actions toward the goal of GC Stewardship to improve the QOL for patients with lupus while managing the disease burden. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To improve the definitions of inflammatory arthritis within the musculoskeletal (MSK) domain of the BILAG-2004 index by incorporating imaging findings and clinical features predictive of response to treatment. Methods The BILAG MSK Subcommittee proposed revisions to the BILAG-2004 index definitions of inflammatory arthritis, based on review of evidence in two recent studies. Data from these studies were pooled and analysed to determine the impact of the proposed changes on the severity grading of inflammatory arthritis. Results The revised definition for severe inflammatory arthritis includes definition of 'basic activities of daily living'. For moderate inflammatory arthritis, it now includes synovitis, defined by either observed joint swelling or MSK US evidence of inflammation in joints and surrounding structures. For mild inflammatory arthritis, the definition now includes reference to symmetrical distribution of affected joints and guidance on how US may help re-classify patients as moderate or no inflammatory arthritis. Data from two recent SLE trials were analysed (219 patients). A total of 119 (54.3%) were graded as having mild inflammatory arthritis (BILAG-2004 Grade C). Of these, 53 (44.5%) had evidence of joint inflammation (synovitis or tenosynovitis) on US. Applying the new definition increased the number of patients classified as moderate inflammatory arthritis from 72 (32.9%) to 125 (57.1%), while patients with normal US (n  = 66/119) could be recategorized as BILAG-2004 Grade D (inactive disease). Conclusions Proposed changes to the definitions of inflammatory arthritis in the BILAG-2004 index will result in more accurate classification of patients who are more or less likely to respond to treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Outcomes of therapy for LN are often suboptimal. Guidelines offer varied options for treatment of LN and treatment strategies may differ between clinicians and regions. We aimed to assess variations in the usual practice of UK physicians who treat LN. Methods We conducted an online survey of simulated LN cases for UK rheumatologists and nephrologists to identify treatment preferences for class IV and class V LN. Results Of 77 respondents, 48 (62.3%) were rheumatologists and 29 (37.7%) were nephrologists. A total of 37 (48.0%) reported having a joint clinic between nephrologists and rheumatologists, 54 (70.0%) reported having a multidisciplinary team meeting for LN and 26 (33.7%) reported having a specialized lupus nurse. Of the respondents, 58 (75%) reported arranging a renal biopsy before starting the treatment. A total of 20 (69%) of the nephrologists, but only 13 (27%) rheumatologists, reported having a formal departmental protocol for treating patients with LN (P  < 0.001). The first-choice treatment of class IV LN in pre-menopausal patients was MMF [41 (53.2%)], followed by CYC [15 (19.6%)], rituximab [RTX; 12 (12.5%)] or a combination of immunosuppressive drugs [9 (11.7%)] with differences between nephrologists' and rheumatologists' choices (P  = 0.026). For class V LN, MMF was the preferred initial treatment, irrespective of whether proteinuria was in the nephrotic range or not. RTX was the preferred second-line therapy for non-responders. Conclusion There was variation in the use of protocols, specialist clinic service provision, biopsies and primary and secondary treatment choices for LN reported by nephrologists and rheumatologists in the UK. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Observations with rituximab suggest B-cell independent mechanisms of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), especially discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE). Type-I interferon receptor blockade with anifrolumab shows efficacy in SLE, but efficacy for cutaneous disease of specific morphologies has not been studied. Interferon has pleotropic immune effects and it is unknown which of these are critical to therapeutic response. Objectives We evaluated clinical efficacy and quality-of-life impact of type-I interferon-blockade in: (i) rituximab-refractory CLE; (ii) DLE and other morphologies and (iii) transcriptomic and flow cytometric biomarkers. Methods We conducted a prospective single - centre study of anifrolumab in refractory mucocutaneous SLE. CLE Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) activity score, health-related quality of life, 96-probe TaqMan® gene expression analysis capturing key SLE blood transcriptome signatures, and eight-colour flow cytometry were undertaken at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months. Results Seven patients [DLE (n = 5), chilblain lupus erythematosus (n = 1), subacute CLE (n = 1)] were evaluated. The median number of prior therapies was six (range 3–15), including rituximab in six of seven patients. Median CLASI-A showed rapid and sustained improvement from 17 at baseline to 6 (P = 0.016) at 1 month and 0 (P < 0.001) by 3 months. The median percentage reduction in CLASI-A at 3 months was 60%. Significant improvements were observed in Dermatology Life Quality Index scores (P < 0.001), EuroQol 5D visual analogue scale (P = 0.002) and LupusQoL fatigue, image and planning domains (P ≤ 0.05). One patient discontinued treatment owing to severe herpes zoster. Clinical responses paralleled discrete suppression of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) from SLE blood transcriptome module M1.2 with more varied downregulation in other interferon modules. Myeloid and inflammation-annotated genes remained upregulated throughout treatment. Intermediate monocytes (CD14++CD16+) reduced to normal levels during therapy (P = 0.014), while other flow subsets showed no substantive changes. Conclusions These data indicate rapid efficacy of anifrolumab in DLE and rituximab-resistant CLE. Response is associated with suppression of a subset of ISGs and decline in intermediate monocytes. Suppression of all ISGs or the wider SLE blood transcriptome is not required for response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Gene expression profiles are associated with the clinical heterogeneity of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) but are not well studied as biomarkers for therapy. We studied gene expression and response to rituximab in a multiethnic UK cohort who were refractory to standard therapy. Methods: We evaluated baseline expression levels of transcripts known to associate with clinical features of SLE using a 96‐probe TaqMan array and whole blood samples from 213 patients with active SLE who had been prospectively enrolled in the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Biologics Register. We measured autoantibodies using immunoprecipitation and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays. We determined responses to first‐cycle rituximab at 6 months from treatment start in 110 SLE patients by assessing BILAG 2004 disease activity. Results: Interferon gene expression scores were lower in patients of European ancestry than in all other ancestry groups. The relationship between blood interferon gene expression scores and scores annotated to plasmablasts, neutrophils, myeloid lineage, inflammation, and erythropoiesis differed between patients of European and non‐European ancestries. Hierarchical clustering revealed 3 distinct non‐European ancestry patient subsets with stratified responses to rituximab that were not explained by sociodemographic and clinical variables, with responses lowest in an interferon‐low, neutrophil‐high cluster and highest in a cluster with high expression levels across all signatures (P < 0.001). Clusters in European ancestry patients did not predict response to rituximab but segregated patients by global disease activity and renal involvement. In both ancestral groups, interferon‐high clusters were associated with U1 RNP/Sm antibodies. Conclusion: Ancestry appears central to the immunologic and clinical heterogeneity in SLE. These results suggest that ancestry, disease activity, and transcriptional signatures could each assist in predicting the effectiveness of B cell depletion therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Secondary inefficacy with infusion reactions and anti-drug antibodies (secondary non-depletion nonresponse, 2NDNR) occurs in 14% of SLE patients receiving repeated rituximab courses. We evaluated baseline clinical characteristics, efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab, a next-generation humanized type-2 anti-CD20 antibody licensed for haematological malignancies in SLE patients with 2NDNR to rituximab. Methods We collated data from SLE patients receiving obinutuzumab for secondary non-response to rituximab in BILAG centres. Disease activity was assessed using BILAG-2004, SLEDAI-2K and serology before, and 6 months after, obinutuzumab 2× 1000 mg infusions alongside methylprednisolone 100 mg. Results All nine patients included in the study received obinutuzumab with concomitant oral immunosuppression. At 6 months post-obinutuzumab, there were significant reductions in median SLEDAI-2K from 12 to 6 (P  = 0.014) and total BILAG-2004 score from 21 to 2 (P  = 0.009). Complement C3 and dsDNA titres improved significantly (both P  = 0.04). Numerical, but not statistically significant improvements were seen in C4 levels. Of 8/9 patients receiving concomitant oral prednisolone at baseline (all >10 mg/day), 5/8 had their dose reduced at 6 months. Four of nine patients were on 5 mg/day and were in Lupus Low Disease Activity State following obinutuzumab. After obinutuzumab, 6/9 patients with peripheral B cell data achieved complete depletion, including 4/4 assessed with highly sensitive assays. Of the nine patients, one obinutuzumab non-responder required CYC therapy. One unvaccinated patient died from COVID-19. Conclusions Obinutuzumab appears to be effective and steroid-sparing in renal and non-renal SLE patients with secondary non-response to rituximab. These patients have severe disease with few treatment options but given responsiveness to B cell depletion, switching to humanized type-2 anti-CD20 therapy is a logical approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective BILAG-2004 index is a comprehensive disease activity instrument for SLE but administrative burden and potential frequency of errors limits its use in routine practice. We aimed to develop a tool for more accurate, time-efficient scoring of BILAG-2004 index with full fidelity to the existing instrument. Methods Frequency of BILAG-2004 items was collated from a BILAG-biologics registry (BILAG-BR) dataset. Easy-BILAG prototypes were developed to address known issues affecting speed and accuracy. After expert verification, accuracy and usability of the finalized Easy-BILAG was validated against standard format BILAG-2004 in a workbook exercise of 10 case vignettes. Thirty-three professionals ranging in expertise from 14 UK centres completed the validation exercise. Results Easy-BILAG incorporates all items present in ≥5% BILAG-BR records, plus full constitutional and renal domains into a rapid single page assessment. An embedded glossary and colour-coding assists domain scoring. A second page captures rarer manifestations when needed. In the validation exercise, Easy-BILAG yielded higher median scoring accuracy (96.7%) than standard BILAG-2004 documentation (87.8%, P = 0.001), with better inter-rater agreement. Easy-BILAG was completed faster (59.5 min) than the standard format (80.0 min, P = 0.04) for 10 cases. An advantage in accuracy was observed with Easy-BILAG use among general hospital rheumatologists (91.3 vs 75.0, P = 0.02), leading to equivalent accuracy as tertiary centre rheumatologists. Clinicians rated Easy-BILAG as intuitive, convenient, and well adapted for routine practice. Conclusion Easy-BILAG facilitates more rapid and accurate scoring of BILAG-2004 across all clinical settings, which could improve patient care and biologics prescribing. Easy-BILAG should be adopted wherever BILAG-2004 assessment is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess outcomes of repeat rituximab cycles and identify predictors of sustained clinical response in systemic manifestations of primary Sjögren syndrome (pSS). Methods: An observational study was conducted in 40 rituximab‐treated patients with pSS. Clinical response was defined as a 3‐point or more reduction in the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Sjögren Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) at 6 months from baseline. Peripheral blood B cells were measured using highly sensitive flow cytometry. Predictors of sustained response (within two rituximab cycles) were analyzed using penalized logistic regression. Results: Thirty‐eight out of 40 patients had moderate to severe systemic disease (ESSDAI >5). Main domains were articular (73%), mucocutaneous (23%), hematological (20%), and nervous system (18%). Twenty‐eight out of 40 (70%) patients were on concomitant immunosuppressants. One hundred sixty‐nine rituximab cycles were administered with a total follow‐up of 165 patient‐years. In cycle 1 (C1), 29/40 (73%) achieved ESSDAI response. Of C1 responders, 23/29 received retreatment on clinical relapse, and 15/23 (65%) responded. Of the 8/23 patients who lost response, these were due to secondary non‐depletion and non‐response (2NDNR; 4/23 [17%] as we previously observed in systemic lupus erythematosus with antirituximab antibodies, inefficacy = 2/23, and other side effects = 2/23). Within two cycles, 13/40 (33%) discontinued therapy. In multivariable analysis, concomitant immunosuppressant (odds ratio 7.16 [95% confidence interval: 1.37–37.35]) and achieving complete B‐cell depletion (9.78 [1.32–72.25]) in C1 increased odds of response to rituximab. At 5 years, 57% of patients continued on rituximab. Conclusion: Our data suggest that patients with pSS should be co‐prescribed immunosuppressant with rituximab, and treatment should aim to achieve complete depletion. About one in six patients develop 2NDNR in repeat cycles. Humanized or type 2 anti‐CD20 antibodies may improve clinical response in extra‐glandular pSS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To characterise the efficacy and safety of anifrolumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) according to interferon gene signature (IFNGS), demographic and clinical subgroups.Methods: We performed post hoc analyses of pooled data from the 52-week phase III TULIP-1/TULIP-2 placebo-controlled trials of intravenous anifrolumab in moderate-to-severe SLE. Outcomes were assessed in predefined subgroups: IFNGS (high/low), age, sex, body mass index, race, geographic region, age of onset, glucocorticoid use, disease activity and serological markers.Results: In pooled data, patients received anifrolumab 300 mg (360/726) or placebo (366/726); 82.6% were IFNGS-high. IFNGS-high patients had greater baseline disease activity and were more likely to have abnormal serological markers versus IFNGS-low patients. In the total population, a greater proportion of patients treated with anifrolumab versus placebo achieved British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) response at week 52 (difference 16.6%; nominal p<0.001). BICLA response treatment differences with anifrolumab versus placebo were comparable to the total population across most predefined subgroups, including subgroups for baseline glucocorticoid dosage (<10/≥10 mg/day prednisone/equivalent) and for clinical disease activity (SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 score <10/≥10). Subgroups with larger treatment differences included IFNGS-high patients (18.2%), patients with abnormal baseline serological markers (23.1%) and Asian patients (29.2%). The safety profile of anifrolumab was similar across subgroups.Conclusions: Overall, this study supports the consistent efficacy and safety of anifrolumab across a range of patients with moderate-to-severe SLE. In a few subgroups, small sample sizes limited conclusions from being drawn regarding the treatment benefit with anifrolumab.Trial Registration Number: NCT02446912, NCT02446899. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although the clinical approach to the management of musculoskeletal manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is often similar to that of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there are distinct differences in immunopathogenesis, structural and imaging phenotypes and therapeutic evidence. Additionally, there are few published comparisons of these diseases. The objective of this narrative literature review is to compare the immunopathogenesis, structural features, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) studies and management of joint manifestations in RA and SLE. We highlight the key similarities and differences between the two diseases. Overall, the literature evaluated indicates that synovitis and radiographical progression are the key features in RA, while inflammation without swelling, tendinitis and tenosynovitis are more prominent features in SLE. In addition, the importance of defining patients with RA by the presence or absence of autoantibodies and categorizing patients with SLE by synovitis detected by musculoskeletal ultrasound and by structural phenotype (non-deforming, non-erosive arthritis, Jaccoud's arthropathy and 'Rhupus') with respect to joint manifestations will also be discussed. An increased understanding of the joint manifestations in RA and SLE may inform evidence-based clinical decisions for both diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This viewpoint article on a forecast of clinically meaningful changes in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in the next 10 years is based on a review of the current state of the art. The groundwork has been laid by a robust series of classification criteria and treatment recommendations that have all been published since 2019. Building on this strong foundation, SLE management predictably will take significant steps forward. Assessment for lupus arthritis will presumably include musculoskeletal sonography. Large-scale polyomics studies are likely to unravel more of the central immune mechanisms of the disease. Biomarkers predictive of therapeutic success may enter the field; the type I interferon signature, as a companion for use of anifrolumab, an antibody against the common type I interferon receptor, is one serious candidate. Besides anifrolumab for nonrenal SLE and the new calcineurin inhibitor voclosporin in lupus nephritis, both of which are already approved in the United States and likely to become available in the European Union in 2022, several other approaches are in advanced clinical trials. These include advanced B cell depletion, inhibition of costimulation via CD40 and CD40 ligand (CD40L), and Janus kinase 1 (Jak1) and Tyrosine kinase 2 (Tyk2) inhibition. At the same time, essentially all of our conventional therapeutic armamentarium will continue to be used. The ability of patients to have successful SLE pregnancies, which has become much better in the last decades, should further improve, with approaches including tumor necrosis factor blockade and self-monitoring of fetal heart rates. While we hope that the COVID-19 pandemic will soon be controlled, it has highlighted the risk of severe viral infections in SLE, with increased risk tied to certain therapies. Although there are some data that a cure might be achievable, this likely will remain a challenge beyond 10 years from now. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Time to relapse after rituximab for the treatment of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is variable, and optimal retreatment strategy has remained unclear. In AAV following rituximab induction, the study objective was to evaluate clinical and B-cell predictors of relapse in order to develop a retreatment algorithm. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted in 70 rituximab-treated ANCA-associated vasculitis patients followed up for over 10 years. Complete response (CR) was defined as Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score v3.0 = 0. Retreatment was given on clinical relapse, defined as new features or worsening of persistent disease (not by biomarker status). Peripheral B-cell subsets were measured using highly sensitive flow cytometry. Predictors were tested using multivariable Cox regression. Results: Median time to retreatment for cycles 1–5 were 84, 73, 67, 60, and 73 weeks. Over 467 patient-years follow-up, 158 relapses occurred in 60 patients; 16 (in 15 patients) were major (renal = 7, neurological = 4, ENT = 3, and respiratory = 2). The major-relapse rate was 3.4/100 patient-years. In multivariable analysis, concomitant immunosuppressant [HR, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.24–0.94)], achieving CR [0.24 (0.12–0.50)], and naïve B-cell repopulation at 6 months [0.43 (0.22–0.84)] were associated with longer time to relapse. Personalized retreatment using these three predictors in this cohort would have avoided an unnecessary fixed retreatment in 24% of patients. Area under the receiver operating characteristic for prediction of time to relapse was greater if guided by naïve B-cell repopulation than if previously evaluated ANCA and/or CD19+ cells return at 6 months had been used, 0.82 and 0.53, respectively. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that all patients should be coprescribed oral immunosuppressant. Those with incomplete response or with absent naïve B cells should be retreated at 6 months. Patients with complete response and naïve repopulation should not receive fixed retreatment. This algorithm could reduce unnecessary retreatment and warrant investigation in clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]