Search

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of preventive interventions in reducing reccurrent diabetic foot ulcers. Meta-analysis (MA) was conducted to address clinical questions on this topic of the Italian guidelines on diabetic foot. Methods: This MA includes randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of various preventive interventions, namely: treatment of pre-ulcerative foot lesions, structured educational programs, psychological interventions and the use of therapeutic footwear to relieve plantar pressure in people with diabetes mellitus and a history of previous ulcers. Results: A total of 731 studies were identified and 14 were considered eligible for the analysis. We found that treatments of pre-ulcerative foot lesions did not provide any statistically significant effects (MH-OR: 0.84 [0.31, 2.33], p = 0.74, I2 = 38%). Conversely, structured educational programs were associated with a trend toward reduction of ulcer recurrence risk (MH-OR: 0.13 [0.01, 1.64], p = 0.10, I2 = 88%). No randomized controlled studies assessing the efficacy of psychological interventions have been retrieved. The use of therapeutic footwears can effectively reduce the risk of reulceration in diabetic patients with an history of previous DFU, in particular prefabricated rigid-soled therapeutic footwears showed a significant reduction of the risk of ulcer recurrence in comparison with semirigid soles (MH-OR: 0.17 [0.05, 0.57], p = 0.004). Conclusions: The study provides low-certainty evidence that, among preventive strategies in patients with previous DFU, rigid-sole therapeutic footwear and structured education programs are capable of reducing the risk of foot re-ulceration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article is a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on the use of prostanoids in patients with diabetes and chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome (DFS). The study found that prostanoids, such as iloprost and alprostadil, did not have a significant beneficial effect on major amputation, minor amputation, all-cause mortality, ulcer healing, pain, transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2), ankle-brachial index (ABI), quality of life, or peri-procedural complications. The authors concluded that the current evidence is not sufficient to support the extensive use of prostanoids in diabetic patients with CLTI, and further research is needed to determine their risk/benefit and cost/efficacy ratios. [Extracted from the article]

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of commonly used offloading devices for the treatment of neuropathic foot ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus. This meta-analysis (MA) has been performed for giving an answer to clinical questions on this topic of the Italian guideline on diabetic foot syndrome. Methods: The present MA includes randomized controlled studies (duration > 12 weeks) comparing, in patients with diabetes mellitus and non-infected neuropathic foot ulcer: any offloading device vs either no offloading device or conventional footwear; removable versus non-removable offloading devices; surgical procedure vs other offloading approaches. The primary endpoint was ulcer healing. Results: A total of 184 studies were identified, and 18 were considered eligible for the analysis. We found that: any plantar off-loading, when compared to the absence of plantar offloading device, is associated with a higher ulcer healing (MH-OR: 3.13 [1.08, 9.11], p = 0.04, I2 = 0%); total contact cast or nonremovable knee-high walker, compared to other offloading devices, had a higher ulcer healing rate (MH-OR: 2.64 [1.43, 4.89], p = 0.002, I2 = 51%); surgical offloading for active ulcers in combination with post-surgery offloading achieves higher ulcer healing rate when compared to offloading devices alone (MH-OR: 6.77 [1.64, 27.93], p = 0.008, I2 = 0%). Conclusions: Any plantar offloading, compared to the absence of plantar offloading device, is associated with a higher ulcer healing rate. Total contact cast or nonremovable knee-high walker, compared to other offloading devices, is preferable. Surgical offloading for active ulcers, in combination with post-surgery offloading devices, achieves a higher ulcer healing rate when compared to other offloading devices alone. Further studies with a larger cohort of patients with diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers and extended follow-up periods are necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The treatment of patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is extremely complex, requiring a comprehensive approach that involves a variety of different healthcare professionals. Several studies have shown that a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach is useful to achieve good clinical outcomes, reducing major and minor amputation and increasing the chance of healing. Despite this, the multidisciplinary approach is not always a recognized treatment strategy. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effects of an MDT approach on major adverse limb events, healing, time-to-heal, all-cause mortality, and other clinical outcomes in patients with active DFUs. The present meta-analysis was performed for the purpose of developing Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot with the support of the Italian Society of Diabetology (Società Italiana di Diabetologia, SID) and the Italian Association of Clinical Diabetologists (Associazione Medici Diabetologi, AMD). The study was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. All randomized clinical trials and observational studies, with a duration of at least 26 weeks, which compared the MDT approach with any other organizational strategy in the management of patients with DFUs were considered. Animal studies were excluded. A search of Medline and Embase databases was performed up until the May 1st, 2023. Patients managed by an MDT were reported to have better outcomes in terms of healing, minor and major amputation, and survival in comparison with those managed using other approaches. No data were found on quality of life, returning-to-walking, and emergency admission. Authors concluded that the MDT may be effective in improving outcomes in patients with DFUs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This document is a correction notice for an article titled "Development of the Italian clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome: design and methodological aspects" published in Acta Diabetologica. The correction addresses errors in Table 1 of the article, specifically in the data for PICO 10 and 11. The corrected versions of these PICOs are provided. Additionally, a typo in the Supplementary Materials is acknowledged, where the minimum studies follow-up threshold for some PICOs was incorrectly stated as 12 weeks instead of the actual threshold of 26 weeks for all studies on pharmacological/nonpharmacological interventions. The correction notice concludes with a statement from Springer Nature, the publisher, emphasizing their neutrality regarding jurisdictional claims and institutional affiliations. [Extracted from the article]