Search

This case report presents a clinical, radiographic, and histologic evaluation of 2 non-adjacent, hydroxyapatite-coated, root-form implants retrieved from the maxillary canine area of a patient after 7 years in function. Clinical examination revealed immobile implants with no sign of pathosis. Radiographic examination indicated close proximity of the bone to the implant surface without evidence of radiolucency. Histologically, the 2 implants appeared to be well integrated with the surrounding bone; 84% of the surface of the first implant and 79% of the surface of the second implant had close bone apposition at the interface. There was no evidence of dissolution of the hydroxyapatite coating. The bone appeared to be in immediate contact with the coating. These observations suggest that a particular hydroxyapatite coating on root-form implants can resist degradation during long-term function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study aimed to assess whether and to what extent the experimental gingivitis clinical parameters are reproducible within selected populations with different gingival inflammatory response (high or low) to plaque accumulation. In addition, the consistency in developing a high or low gingival inflammatory response within the selected populations was evaluated.Material and Methods: Thirty-seven subjects previously identified as high (HR, n=20) or low responders (LR, n=17) during an experimental gingivitis trial (first trial) were enrolled in a 'repeat' experimental gingivitis trial.Results: No significant differences in plaque accumulation parameters and bleeding index values were detected between first and repeat trial for the 37 participants. Gingival index was higher during the repeat trial but behaved consistently in terms of the temporal changes in the course of both trials in both populations. Of the 17 LR participants, 10 manifested low susceptibility to inflammation after repeat trial. Among the 20 HR, 10 manifested high susceptibility to inflammation after repeat trial.Conclusions: These results indicate that our experimental gingivitis model is reproducible to some extent in selected populations. The high reproducibility of plaque and, to a lesser extent, of inflammation parameters under the employed controlled conditions could be a valuable tool in gingivitis research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AIM: The aim of this study was to characterize the gingival inflammatory response to de novo plaque accumulation in subjects treated for aggressive periodontitis (AP). The gingival inflammatory response of the AP subjects was retrospectively compared with that of periodontally healthy individuals (PH) matched for exposure to plaque and of periodontally healthy subjects previously identified as 'high responders' (HR) and 'low responders' (LR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 13 AP subjects and 26 matched PH subjects participated in a 21-day experimental gingivitis trial. Plaque index (PlI), Gingival index (GI), gingival crevicular fluid volume (GCF) and angulated bleeding score (AngBS) were recorded at days 0, 7, 14 and 21. Cumulative plaque exposure (CPE), i.e. PlI over time, was also calculated. RESULTS: GCF was significantly higher in AP compared with PH group at each observation interval (p< or =0.001). In addition, GCF was significantly higher in AP group compared with either LR or HR groups at each observation interval (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that susceptibility to gingival inflammation in response to de novo plaque accumulation may be related to susceptibility to periodontitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown an association between an acute stressful event and gingivitis. However, the possible effects of personality traits associated with stress resistance/susceptibility and current level of stress on the clinical expression of plaque-induced inflammation remain to be examined. The aim of this study was to characterize the subject-based clinical behaviour of the gingiva during experimental gingivitis in relation to personality profile, psychological stress and coping behaviour. METHODS: Ninety-six systemically and periodontally healthy subjects (mean age: 23.6+/-1.7 years), 46 males and 50 females, non-smokers, participated in a randomized, split-mouth, localized experimental gingivitis trial. Prior to the trial, subjects were asked to complete self-administered questionnaires evaluating personality traits (Hardiness scale and Courtauld Emotional Control Scale), subjective stress (Visual Analogue Scale-Total Distress), social support (Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, MSPSS) and life events (Life Experiences Survey (LES)). The influence of psychosocial factors was investigated in the overall population as well as in two sub-populations with different inflammatory response to plaque accumulation. RESULTS: No significant relationships were found between gingival inflammation variables and psychological measures. No significant differences were detected between subjects with different susceptibilties to plaque-associated gingivitis for any considered psychological variable. A significant association between plaque variables and LES (negative) or MSPSS (positive) was found; however, the variance explained by the model was low. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in the current level of stress and psychosocial variables indicative of stress susceptibility do not account for variability in plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation during experimental gingivitis in young adults. Copyright (c) Blackwell Munksgaard, 2005. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AIM: The aims of this study were to validate a randomized, split-mouth, localized experimental gingivitis model and to identify subjects with different gingivitis susceptibility. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In each of 96 healthy subjects, one maxillary quadrant was randomly assigned as 'test' (experimental gingivitis) and the contralateral quadrant as 'control'. Plaque index (PlI), gingival index (GI), gingival crevicular fluid volume (GCF), and angulated bleeding score (AngBS) were recorded in both quadrants at days 0, 7, 14, and 21. Cumulative plaque exposure (CPE), i.e. PlI over time, was calculated. Day-21 GCF was standardized according to CPE, and residuals of GCF on CPE were calculated. Two subpopulations were then defined, based on upper and lower quartiles of GCF-residual distribution and were, respectively, identified as 'high-responder' (HR; n=24) and 'low-responder' (LR; n=24). RESULTS: At test quadrants, all parameters significantly increased throughout the trial, while in control quadrants, PlI, GI, and AngBS remained low. Significant differences were noted between test and control quadrants on days 7, 14, and 21 for all parameters. Significant increases in GI, AngBS, and GCF were observed in test quadrants over the course of the study in both HR and LR groups. Significant differences were noted between HR and LR groups for all gingivitis parameters on day 21 in test quadrants, without any significant differences in PlI or CPE between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: We identified two subpopulations characterized by significant differences in clinical parameters of plaque-induced gingival inflammation, despite similar amounts of plaque deposits and plaque accumulation rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AIM: The aim of the present study was to characterize the subject-based clinical behavior of the gingiva in response to a tooth-cleaning regimen in two subpopulations, 'high-responder' (HR) and 'low-responder' (LR) groups, presenting a different inflammatory response to plaque accumulation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study population comprised of 96 systemically and periodontally healthy subjects, 46 males and 50 females, non-smokers, enrolled in an experimental gingivitis trial. At completion of the experimental gingivitis period (day 21), all subjects were prescribed the same 21-day treatment regimen of amine/stannous fluoride (AmF/SnF(2))-containing toothpaste and mouthrinse. Plaque index (PlI), gingival index (GI), gingival crevicular fluid volume (GCF), and angulated bleeding score (AngBS) were recorded on three selected teeth. Treatment efficacy was evaluated in the overall population as well as in HR and LR groups, separately. RESULTS: A statistically significant decrease of PlI was observed after treatment (p<0.001), with PlI reversing to baseline levels. Changes in PlI revealed the same trend in both HR and LR groups, without differences between groups. Treatment also resulted in a significant decrease of all gingivitis parameters (p<0.001 for all comparisons). After treatment, GI, AngBS, and GCF were comparable with baseline condition. However, when the two groups were compared, day 42-GCF was significantly higher in the HR group than the LR group. CONCLUSIONS: A treatment regimen based on mechanical plaque control supplemented with AmF/SnF(2)-containing toothpaste and mouthrinse is effective in reducing plaque accumulation and re-establishing healthy gingival conditions after experimentally induced gingivitis, even in subjects with different inflammatory response to plaque accumulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The microbial etiology of gingivitis and periodontitis provides the rationale for use of adjunctive antimicrobial agents in the prevention and treatment of periodontal diseases. Although mechanical removal of supra- and subgingival calcified and non-calcified plaque deposits has been proved effective to control the gingival inflammatory lesions as well as to halt the progression of periodontal attachment loss, some patients may experience additional benefits from the use of systemic or topical antimicrobial agents. Such agents are able to significantly affect supra- and subgingival plaque accumulation and/or suppress or eradicate periodontal pathogenic microflora. Currently, properly selected local antiseptic and systemic antibiotic therapies can provide periodontal treatment that is generally effective, low-risk and affordable. This paper will briefly review the host-related conditions in which the periodontal preventive and therapeutic approaches may be effectively assisted by a local antimicrobial regimen. Potential future indications for adjunctive local antimicrobial therapy will also be discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]