Search

Risky decision-making is characteristic of drug users, but little is known about the effects of circumstances, such as abstinence, on risky choice behavior in human drug users. We hypothesized that cocaine users would make more risky choices for cocaine (defined as taking a chance to receive a large number of cocaine doses as opposed to choosing to receive a fixed amount of cocaine) after 3 or 7 days of cocaine abstinence, compared to 1 day of cocaine abstinence. Six male nontreatment-seeking current cocaine smokers were enrolled in a 21-day inpatient within-subject study. Participants repeatedly smoked six 25 mg doses of cocaine during a training session and were instructed that they would be making decisions about smoking this dose throughout the study. After 1, 3 and 7 days of cocaine abstinence, participants completed a computerized task in which they repeatedly decided between receiving a guaranteed number of cocaine doses (between 1 and 5; fixed option) or receiving a chance (0.13 to 0.75) to smoke a larger number of cocaine doses (probabilistic option). After completing the computerized task, one of the participants' choices was randomly implemented and they smoked either the fixed number of cocaine doses or had the specified chance to smoke the greater number of doses. Contrary to our hypothesis, 5 of the 6 participants made fewer risky choices after 3 and 7 days of cocaine abstinence compared to one day of abstinence suggesting greater risk-aversion. Thus, even during cocaine abstinence cocaine users make rational decisions related to their drug use.

Human drug use involves repeated choices to take drugs or to engage in alternative behaviors. The purpose of this study was to examine how response cost for cocaine and the value of an alternative reinforcer (opportunity to play a game of chance) and how ‘free’ doses (with minimal response cost) affected cocaine choice. Two laboratory studies of cocaine self-administration were conducted in a group of humans who were habitual cocaine smokers and in a group of rhesus monkeys that intravenously self-administered cocaine. Nine human cocaine smokers who were not seeking treatment for their cocaine were repeatedly presented with the choice to smoke 25 mg cocaine base or play a game of chance for a monetary bonus paid at study completion. The response cost for choosing cocaine varied (up to 4000 responses/dose) and the number of game plays varied (up to 8). In this sample of humans, increasing either the response cost for cocaine or increasing the value of the alternative reinforcer did not significantly affect cocaine choice, while increasing both simultaneously slightly decreased cocaine choice and increased choice of the alternative. In monkeys, the dose–response function for cocaine self-administration (10 choices of 0.0125–0.1 mg/kg/infusion vs. candy coated chocolate) was steep and we failed to achieve a 50/50 cocaine/candy choice even after substantially manipulating cost and number of candies available. Providing a large ‘free’ self-administered cocaine dose to humans did not significantly affect cocaine choice, whereas in monkeys, a large free dose of cocaine decreased cocaine choice when higher doses of cocaine were available for self-administration. The present results demonstrate that in the laboratory, it is difficult to modify on-going cocaine self-administration behavior in both humans and non-human primates.

Epidemiological findings suggest that men and women vary in their pattern of cocaine use resulting in differences in cocaine dependence and relapse rates. Preclinical laboratory studies have demonstrated that female rodents are indeed more sensitive to cocaine's reinforcing effects than males, with estrous cycle stage as a key determinant of this effect. The current study sought to extend these findings to normally cycling female rhesus macaques, a species that shares a nearly identical menstrual cycle to humans. Dose-dependent intravenous cocaine self-administration (0.0125, 0.0250, and 0.0500 mg/kg/infusion) using a progressive-ratio schedule of reinforcement was determined across the menstrual cycle. The menstrual cycle was divided into 5 discrete phases – menses, follicular, periovulatory, luteal, and late luteal phases – verified by the onset of menses and plasma levels of estradiol and progesterone. Dependent variables including number of infusions self-administered per session, progressive ratio breakpoint, and cocaine intake were analyzed according to cocaine dose and menstrual cycle phase. Analysis of plasma hormone levels verified phase-dependent fluctuations of estradiol and progesterone, with estrogen levels peaking during the periovulatory phase, and progesterone peaking during the luteal phase. Progressive ratio breakpoint, infusions self-administered, and cocaine intake did not consistently vary based on menstrual cycle phase. These findings demonstrate that under the current experimental parameters, the reinforcing effects of cocaine did not vary across the menstrual cycle in a systematic fashion in normally cycling rhesus macaques.

The present study determined whether: (1) the response to alcohol varied as a function of menstrual cycle phase and (2) women with a paternal history of alcoholism (FHP) were less sensitive to the effects of alcohol compared to women without a family history of alcoholism (FHN). The behavioral effects of alcohol (0.00, 0.25, and 0.75 g/kg) were evaluated in 21 FHN and 24 FHP women; each dose was tested during both the midfollicular and late luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. Baseline negative mood was increased during the luteal phase compared to the follicular phase (increased Beck Depression scores and decreased Vigor, Arousal, and Friendly scores). Alcohol increased ratings of Drug Liking and Good Drug Effect more in the luteal phase than the follicular phase. FHP women had greater negative mood during the luteal phase and some of these dysphoric effects were increased by alcohol more in FHP women than FHN women. Alcohol impaired performance, with no group or menstrual cycle differences. However, consistent with previous studies, FHP women were less impaired by alcohol than FHN women on the balance task. These data indicate that (1) the differences in response to alcohol across the menstrual cycle are subtle, although alcohol is liked more during the luteal phase; (2) increases in dysphoric mood during the luteal phase are more pronounced in FHP women compared to FHN women, particularly after alcohol; and (3) the differences observed in response to alcohol between FHP and FHN women are less pronounced than previously shown in men.

Stimulant abuse continues to be a problem, particularly for women. There is increasing preclinical and clinical evidence showing that the hormone progesterone attenuates the behavioral effects of cocaine, and this effect is primarily observed in females. The purpose of the present study was to determine if progesterone would also alter the behavioral effects of another stimulant, oral d-amphetamine (AMPH) in women. Eighteen normal non-drug abusing women completed eight outpatient sessions over two menstrual cycles. During the follicular phase of each cycle, women were administered AMPH (0, 10, 20 mg); in one cycle they were pretreated with oral micronized progesterone (200 mg) and in another cycle they were pretreated with placebo progesterone. Each session, participants completed a range of tasks including subjective measures of abuse liability, cognitive performance tasks, and behavioral measures of impulsivity and risk-taking. AMPH produced dose-related increases in positive subjective effects and these effects were enhanced by progesterone pretreatment. AMPH alone, or in combination with progesterone, had little effect on performance or behavioral measures of impulsivity. These results are in contrast with previous studies showing that progesterone attenuates the subjective response to cocaine and nicotine. Additional studies are needed to explore the modulatory role of progesterone on the effects of AMPH to determine whether progesterone has any clinical utility for AMPH abuse.

Alcoholism is a major public health problem in the United States, such that approximately 15.6 million people meet criteria for alcohol abuse or dependence, and over 800,000 received treatment for alcohol abuse or dependence in 2006 (SAMHSA, 2007). Despite the enormous impact of this disease on society, there are only three medications (disulfiram, naltrexone, and acamprosate) currently approved by the FDA for the treatment of alcohol dependence (e.g., Bouza et al., 2004; Heilig and Egli, 2006; Kiefer and Mann, 2005; Kranzler and Van Kirk, 2001) and given their limited efficacy there is a need for additional pharmacotherapies for alcohol dependence. The interaction of alcohol with the gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA)-ergic neurotransmitter system is well known (Grant and Lovinger, 2005) and targeting GABA-ergic neurotransmission has been considered as a potential treatment strategy for alcohol dependence (Johnson et al., 2005; Heilig and Egli, 2006). Baclofen, a GABA-B receptor agonist, has attracted considerable attention as a potential medication not only for alcoholism (Addolorato et al., 2006a; Colombo et al., 2004; Heilig and Egli, 2006; Johnson et al., 2005; Kranzler, 2000), but also for other addictive disorders (Cousins et al., 2002). There is encouraging preclinical evidence in laboratory rodents that baclofen decreases 1) alcohol withdrawal symptoms (Colombo et al., 2000; Knapp et al., 2007), 2) acquisition and maintenance of voluntary alcohol consumption (Colombo et al., 2000, 2002; Daoust et al., 1987), 3) alcohol consumption associated with alcohol deprivation (Colombo et al., 2003a, 2006), 4) alcohol self-administration (Anstrom et al., 2003; Besheer et al., 2004; Liang et al., 2006; Walker and Koob, 2007), and 5) responding for alcohol during extinction, suggestive of decreased motivation to obtain alcohol (Colombo et al., 2003b; Maccioni et al., 2008). However, not all preclinical studies have reported that baclofen produces a reduction in alcohol consumption or self-administration (e.g., Colombo et al., 2005; Czachowski et al., 2006; Moore et al., 2007; Petry, 1997; Smith et al., 1999; Tomkins and Fletcher, 1996). Nonetheless, the preclinical literature suggests that baclofen may have therapeutic efficacy for alcoholism. Several studies have been conducted in humans to evaluate the efficacy of baclofen for the treatment of patients with alcohol problems. One of the first studies used an open-label design in 10 alcohol-dependent patients (Addolorato et al., 2000) and found that maintenance on 30 mg/day of baclofen for 4 weeks decreased alcohol craving in the 9 patients who completed the study, with 7 patients maintaining total abstinence. Similar positive findings were obtained in two subsequent studies, both of which maintained alcohol-dependent patients on 30 mg/day of baclofen (Addolorato et al., 2002a; Flannery et al., 2004). These findings were recently extended and confirmed in a larger randomized clinical trial among alcohol-dependent patients with liver cirrhosis who were treated with either baclofen (30 mg/day) or placebo for 12 weeks (Addolorato et al., 2007). In all of these studies, side effects of baclofen were minimal and retention was excellent. Further, there have been two case reports showing that high doses of baclofen (100–140 mg/day) were effective in reducing alcohol craving and consumption (Ameisen, 2005; Buckman, 2007). Lastly, several small pilot studies have reported that baclofen (30 mg/day) reduces alcohol withdrawal symptoms in alcohol-dependent patients (Addolorato et al., 2002b, 2003, 2006b). Despite the promising preclinical and clinical findings to date suggesting that baclofen may be effective for treating alcohol dependence, there is a paucity of human laboratory studies assessing the interaction of baclofen and alcohol. Human behavioral laboratory studies can play an important role in the early stages of the medication development process for drug and alcohol abuse (Cousins et al., 2002; O’Brien and Gardner, 2005), particularly for assessing the safety of a candidate medication when administered alone and in combination with alcohol, as well as to elucidate the therapeutic mechanism. Baclofen is a centrally acting muscle relaxant approved by the FDA for the alleviation of signs and symptoms of spasticity; while the usual dose range is between 40–80 mg daily in divided doses, much higher doses have been used for the treatment of spasticity with a good safety profile (Aisen et al., 1992). Baclofen is also known to have anxiolytic effects (Breslow et al., 1989; Drake et al., 2003; Jamous et al., 1994), even among a population of alcoholic patients (Krupitsky et al.,1993), and these anxiolytic effects have been hypothesized to reduce alcohol craving and drinking. In fact, several studies have observed a reduction in anxiety in baclofen-treated alcohol-dependent patients (Addolorato et al., 2002a, 2006b, 2007;Flannery et al., 2004). Alternatively, baclofen may reduce alcohol craving and drinking by reducing the positive effects of alcohol, including the stimulant effects (Cousins et al., 2002), or by enhancing the negative effects of alcohol, including sedation. Despite these potential benefits, the sedative and anxiolytic effects of baclofen also raise concerns about the safety of baclofen in combination with alcohol and its abuse liability (Heilig and Egli, 2006). The purpose of the present study was to comprehensively assess the acute behavioral and physiological effects of baclofen (0, 40, 80 mg) alone, and in combination with an intoxicating dose of alcohol (0.75 g/kg) in non-treatment seeking heavy social drinkers. Specifically, we wanted to address the issues related to the safety profile of baclofen alone and in combination with alcohol, as well as the behavioral effects of baclofen that might elucidate the nature of its putative pharmacotherapeutic effect.

Background: There is growing evidence that N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists may have potential for the treatment of alcohol disorders. Memantine is a selective noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist that has been shown to decrease alcohol craving in moderate drinkers. This 16-week double-blind outpatient pilot clinical trial determined if memantine was more effective than placebo at reducing alcohol use in actively drinking alcohol-dependent patients. Methods: Forty-four treatment-seeking alcohol-dependent individuals were enrolled, with 34 patients stratified to either the memantine group (n=19; maximum dose of 40 mg/d) or the placebo (PBO; n=15) group. The primary outcome measures were related to alcohol use (average drinks per day, average drinks per drinking day, percentage of heavy drinking days, and percentage of days abstinent) based on the timeline follow-back (TLFB). Secondary outcome measures included the Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale, Clinical Global Impression ratings, and γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT), a biomarker of recent alcohol use. To enhance retention, patients received voucher incentives for clinic attendance. Results: Of those randomized, approximately 80% (27) completed the entire 16-week trial. Longitudinal analysis of drinks per day and drinks per drinking day showed a significant reduction in alcohol use, but no difference between the 2 groups. Further, the percentage of heavy drinking days indicated that both groups showed a significant decrease in drinking behavior, but there was significant treatment effect in favor of the PBO group. Similarly, for the percentage of days abstinent, the PBO group achieved a significantly greater percentage of days abstinent at a faster rate than the memantine group. Lastly, the memantine group reported a greater number of side effects compared with the PBO group, such that 26% of patients had their drug dose decreased or discontinued due to memantine-related side effects. Conclusions: The results of this double-blind placebo-controlled pilot trial do not support the use of memantine for the treatment of actively drinking alcohol-dependent patients. However, voucher incentives did facilitate retention.

The purpose of this double-blind 14-week trial was to compare the efficacy of sustained-release methylphenidate (MPH) to placebo (PBO) in treating adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in current cocaine dependent (CD) treatment seekers. The randomized sample consisted of 106 participants who were predominately male (83%) and 60% Caucasian, 14% Hispanic, 20% African-American and 6% other. All participants met DSM-IV criteria for ADHD and CD. There were no significant demographic differences between the two treatment groups. All participants received weekly individual cognitive behavioral therapy. There was no difference in retention rate based on treatment group (p=.91). The majority of the PBO group and the MPH group reported >30% improvement in their ADHD symptoms (55% versus 47%), with no significant difference between the two groups (p=.44). Using a combined outcome measure (>30% reduction in ADHD symptoms and CGI

Background Alcohol effects in humans involve gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) neurotransmission. It has been proposed that GABAergic medications may be effective in the treatment of alcohol dependence. This study evaluated the acute effects of gabapentin, an anticonvulsant that increases extracellular GABA, on the subjective, physiological, and performance effects of alcohol in heavy (mean 34 drinks per week) alcohol drinkers. Methods Seventeen volunteers without alcohol dependence were tested using a double-blind design with three 3-day long inpatient phases, each separated by at least a 1-week wash-out period. Each phase, gabapentin (0, 1000, or 2000 mg) was administered 4 h before alcohol (0.75 g/kg), which was given in four divided doses every 20 min. Results Gabapentin impaired the ability to balance without producing changes in subjective, physiological or other performance measures. Pretreatment with gabapentin did not significantly alter subjective and performance effects of alcohol and did not alter alcohol craving. Gabapentin, dose-dependently enhanced alcohol-induced tachycardia. Conclusions Acute gabapentin administration was well tolerated in combination with alcohol, but did not alter the effects of alcohol.

Although most studies show that women have higher subjective pain ratings in response to painful stimuli, there is less consistency across studies with regard to the influence of gonadal hormones on pain responsivity. The present study evaluated sex differences in response to cold pressor pain in normally menstruating women (NMW), women maintained on oral contraceptives (OCW), and men. Testing occurred during 5 phases of the menstrual cycle. All participants completed 10 sessions (2 sessions per phase). During the cold pressor test, participants immersed the forearm into water maintained at 4°C, and pain threshold and tolerance were measured. Subjective ratings of pain, physiologic indices, and plasma levels of estradiol and progesterone were also assessed. Both estradiol and progesterone levels varied as a function of menstrual cycle phase in NMW and were significantly higher in NMW compared with OCW and men. There were no significant differences in pain threshold or tolerance for any of the groups as a function of menstrual cycle phase. There were no significant differences in pain tolerance between groups. However, pain threshold was higher in NMW compared with OCW and men. When the data were reanalyzed across consecutive sessions, a significant sex-by-day interaction was observed for both threshold and tolerance. Specifically, pain threshold and tolerance were similar for NMW, OCW, and men, but these latencies changed at different rates across session days. Pain threshold remained relatively constant for both OCW and men, but it increased across days for NMW. Pain tolerance remained stable across sessions in OCW, a slow consistent increase was observed for men, whereas a sharper increase, followed by an asymptote, was observed for NMW. These results suggest that circulating gonadal hormones might mediate adaptation to cold pressor pain. Perspective The present study supports the notion that differences in pain perception between the sexes and among menstrual cycle phases are subtle. However, normally menstruating women exhibited an increase in pain tolerance and threshold over repeated stimulation, whereas men exhibited a shallow increase in pain threshold only, suggesting a sex difference in the adaptation to painful stimuli in men and women.

Numerous studies in rodents suggest that there are sex differences in response to cocaine that are related to fluctuations in the ovarian hormones of females. Given that female rhesus monkeys have menstrual cycles that are remarkably similar to those of humans, they provide an ideal laboratory animal model for assessing the effects of cocaine across the menstrual cycle. The present study assessed the effects of 4 injections of intravenous (i.v.) cocaine (0.00, 0.25 or 0.50 mg/kg), spaced 15 min apart, in 4 female rhesus monkeys. Each monkey was tested with each dose during 4 phases of the menstrual cycle: menses, midfollicular, periovulatory and midluteal. Estradiol and progesterone levels were measured each session before cocaine administration to verify phase of the menstrual cycle. Cocaine and cocaine metabolite levels were measured 5 min after each cocaine dose and 5, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 120 min after the last cocaine dose. Similarly, levels of luteinizing hormone (LH) and prolactin levels were measured before, 5, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 120 min after the last cocaine dose. Cocaine and metabolite levels increased as a function of dose, but there were minimal differences across the menstrual cycle following repeated injections of cocaine. With a few exceptions, LH levels decreased as a function of time within the session, with no differences as a function of cocaine dose. Cocaine produced transient increases in LH levels during the luteal phase, with maximal levels occurring after the second cocaine injection. Lastly, cocaine substantially decreased prolactin levels across all menstrual cycle phases. Taken together, these data indicate that any behavioral differences observed either across the menstrual cycle or between males and females, are probably not related to alterations in the pharmacokinetics of cocaine across the menstrual cycle.

Background A decrease in dopamine type 2 receptors (D 2 ) and mesolimbic dopamine transmission predisposes animals to consume alcohol. This study measured D 2 receptors and dopamine transmission in human alcohol-dependent (AD) subjects using positron emission tomography (PET) and [ 11 C]raclopride. Methods Fifteen AD and 15 healthy control (HC) subjects were scanned before and after a psychostimulant challenge (amphetamine .3 mg/kg intravenous). The outcome measures for baseline D 2 receptor availability were binding potential (BP) and the equilibrium partition coefficient (V 3 ″). Amphetamine-induced [ 11 C]raclopride displacement was measured as the difference in V 3 ″ between the two scans. Results [ 11 C]raclopride BP was significantly reduced by 16.6% in the limbic striatum, 19.2% in the associative striatum, and 21.3% in the sensorimotor striatum in AD subjects compared with HC. The alcohol-dependent subjects showed a blunting of amphetamine-induced dopamine release in the limbic striatum: [ 11 C]raclopride displacement was −5.2% ± 3.6% in AD subjects compared with −13.0% ± 8.8% in HC. However, no significant difference in [ 11 C]raclopride displacement was seen in the associative (−4.6% ± 5.8% in AD subjects vs. −6.7 ± 5.4% in HC) and sensorimotor (−12.3% ± 7.3% in AD subjects vs. −13.7 ± 7.5% in HC) subdivisions of the striatum between the two groups. Conclusions Alcohol dependence was associated with a decrease in D 2 receptors in each striatal subdivision, whereas amphetamine-induced dopamine release was reduced in the limbic striatum only.

Several studies in rodents suggest that there are sex differences in response to cocaine that are related to fluctuations in the ovarian hormones of females. Female rhesus monkeys have menstrual cycles that are remarkably similar to human menstrual cycles in both duration and hormonal variations. Therefore, data obtained in monkeys should be an ideal model for assessing the effects of cocaine across the menstrual cycle in humans. The present study assessed the acute effects of intravenous cocaine (0, 0.25, 0.50, and 1.00 mg/kg) in five female rhesus monkeys during four phases of the menstrual cycle: menses, midfollicular, periovulatory, and midluteal. To reduce the effects of stress that can occur from sedation, all animals were trained to enter primate chairs so that repeated blood samples could be obtained in awake animals. Hormone levels for estradiol and progesterone were measured each session before cocaine administration. Cocaine and cocaine metabolite plasma levels were measured at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 min after cocaine administration. Similarly, levels of luteinizing hormone (LH) were measured before, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 min after cocaine administration. Within 5 min of cocaine administration, cocaine plasma levels peaked and dose-dependent behavioral changes (ie increased motor activity, mydriasis, and refusal of treats) were observed. These effects typically resolved in 15-30 min. There were few differences in the pharmacokinetic profile of cocaine across the menstrual cycle. However, the cocaine metabolites, BZE and EME, did vary across the menstrual cycle, with both being increased in the luteal phase, particularly following the highest dose of cocaine. In addition, unlike previous studies, cocaine did not produce consistent increases in LH levels. Rather, the change in LH levels depended on menstrual cycle phase and cocaine dose. In summary, there is little evidence that the pharmacokinetics of cocaine vary as a function of menstrual cycle phase.

Individuals who are moderate drinkers are at increased risk to abuse alcohol. Moreover, women are more vulnerable than men to the adverse consequences of alcohol consumption and recent data indicate that the drinking pattern in women is becoming more similar to that of men. However, few studies have determined whether female moderate drinkers (MD) show a differential response to the subjective and performance effects of alcohol, compared to female light drinkers (LD). Fifteen female MD who consumed an average of 34.7 drinks/month were compared to 15 female LD who consumed an average of 6.7 drinks/month. None of the participants had a first-degree family history of alcoholism or substance abuse. The acute effects of alcohol (0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 mg/kg) were evaluated using a double-blind, placebo-controlled outpatient design. Drug effects were assessed using a full range of performance measures, subjective-effects questionnaires and observer ratings. Alcohol impaired performance in a dose-related manner on all performance tasks for both groups of females. However, MD were less impaired than LD on balance and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). This reduced response was also evident from the observer ratings, with MD being viewed as less impaired by alcohol than LD. While ratings of Drug Liking increased in both groups of women on the ascending limb of the breath alcohol curve, alcohol was disliked by LD on the descending limb and LD reported increased ratings of Bad Drug Effects following the high dose of alcohol. The reduced performance impairment, coupled with the positive subjective effects and relative absence of adverse subjective effects, suggestive of behavioral tolerance, could result in a progression towards increased alcohol consumption among moderate female social drinkers.

Alcohol effects in humans involve N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-mediated glutamatergic neurotransmission. It has been proposed that NMDA receptor antagonists may be effective in the treatment of alcohol dependence. This study evaluated the acute effects of memantine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, on the subjective, physiological, and performance effects of alcohol in moderate (10–30 drinks per week) alcohol drinkers. Eighteen volunteers without alcohol dependence were tested using a double-blind design with three 3-day long inpatient phases separated by at least a 2-week wash-out period. Memantine (0, 15, and 30 mg) was administered 4 h before alcohol (1.5 g/l body water), which was given in four divided doses every 20 min. Pretreatment with memantine attenuated the craving for alcohol before alcohol administration, but not after alcohol was given. Memantine increased the dissociative effects of alcohol, without altering its sedative, stimulant, and overall intoxicating effects. Memantine also did not affect alcohol-induced impairment in performance, physiological changes, or pharmacokinetics. Memantine increased subjective reports of dissociation, confusion, and stimulation, and impaired motor coordination on the balance task. Memantine was well tolerated in combination with alcohol. The findings suggest that NMDA receptor neurotransmission may be involved in alcohol craving and alcohol-induced subjective dissociative effects.

Several studies have demonstrated that males with a family history of alcoholism (FHP) show less of a response to alcohol (e.g. lower ratings of intoxication) than males without a family history of alcoholism (FHN). The purpose of this pilot study was to determine if FHP females also showed a reduced sensitivity to alcohol compared to FHN females.To determine if FHP females (n=16) were less sensitive to the subjective effects and performance-impairing effects of alcohol compared to FHN females (n=16).The effects of placebo and alcohol (0.25, 0.50, 0.75 g/kg, based on total body water) were evaluated using a double-blind, placebo-controlled outpatient design. Drug effects were assessed using performance tasks, observer ratings of drug effect and subjective ratings of drug effect.There were no differences in breath alcohol levels between FHN and FHP women. FHP women were less impaired by alcohol than FHN women, as shown by DSST scores and observer-ratings. However, FHP women were more impaired on the Digit Recall task after alcohol than FHN women and they tended to have higher ratings of "Good Drug Effect," "Drug Liking" and "Willingness to Take Again." Of note, FHP women reported more dysphoric mood than FHN women in the absence of alcohol administration.The results of the present study suggest that FHP women may have a reduced response to alcohol on some measures, but FHP women report greater positive effects on other measures. Overall, the differences between FHP and FHN women are subtle compared to the previous studies demonstrating a reduced response to alcohol in FHP men.

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the reinforcing effects of smoked heroin in nonopioid-dependent nonhuman primates when an alternative reinforcer, sweetened fluid, was made available. Four adult male rhesus monkeys lived in three chambers, with heroin self-administration (0, 0.3, and 0.6 mg/kg) specific to one end of the chamber, oral sweetened fluid self-administration specific to the other end chamber, and no commodity available in the middle chamber. The length of time monkeys spent in the drug-associated chamber provided one measure of drug seeking (i.e., location preference). During self-administration sessions, a second-order schedule of reinforcement was used, with responding during the first component maintained by a brief presentation of the stimuli associated with reinforcement. Responding during the second component was maintained by a delivery of the reinforcer, and the associated stimuli. Responding during the first component provided a second measure of drug seeking. Monkeys also had choice trials each day, when they could choose to work for either commodity. Choice behavior provided a third measure of drug seeking. Each experimental day consisted of a smoking session (four smoking trials), a sweetened fluid session (four fluid trials), and a choice session (four choice trials). Monkeys typically completed all four smoking trials each day when either of the active heroin doses was available. They chose both heroin doses over fluid on 3.5 of the four choice trials, and they had a location preference for the heroin chamber. Under baseline conditions, the number of acquisition responses and the number of consumption responses (inhalations) were greater for the high dose of heroin compared to the low dose of heroin. Further, it took longer to extinguish the responding for the high dose of heroin compared to the low dose of heroin when a vehicle was substituted. During heroin extinction, acquisition responding for fluid increased, the number of fluid choices increased, and location preference shifted to the fluid chamber. These data suggest that in nondependent rhesus monkeys, measures of heroin seeking decreased when heroin was not available and seeking behavior shifted to the available alternative commodity.

Rationale. Previous studies have shown that buprenorphine differentially suppresses the reinforcing effects of different drugs (cocaine, alfentanil), drug versus nondrug reinforcers (food, drug), and the same reinforcer (food) maintained under different schedules of reinforcement. Objectives. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether buprenorphine (0.03, 0.1, 0.3 mg/kg) differentially affects candy versus sweetened fluid self-administration. The hypotheses were that (1) candy would maintain higher rates of responding and would be chosen on more occasions than sweetened fluid, and (2) buprenorphine would produce smaller disruptions in responding for the more-preferred reinforcer. Methods. During separate sessions, rhesus monkeys self-administered candy alone, sweetened fluid alone, or had the opportunity to choose between candy and sweetened fluid. Monkeys responded under a second order, two-chain schedule of reinforcement. Results. Candy was a more-preferred reinforcer than sweetened fluid. Buprenorphine significantly decreased rates of responding for fluid, but increased rates of responding for candy. Although buprenorphine significantly decreased both candy and fluid intake, it produced a more robust, and longer-lasting suppression of sweetened-fluid intake than candy. Choice to self-administer candy or fluid was not affected by buprenorphine. Conclusions. These results demonstrate that behavior maintained by a less-preferred reinforcer is more easily disrupted by buprenorphine than is behavior maintained by a more-preferred reinforcer.

Objective: To compare caffeine and theobromine absorption after oral administration of capsules, cola beverage and chocolate candy. Methods: Three males and four females who abstained from methylxanthines received five methylxanthine-containing treatments: caffeine in capsules (72 mg), administered twice; theobromine in capsules (370 mg); cola beverage (72 mg caffeine) and chocolate candy (72 mg caffeine and 370 mg theobromine). Plasma methylxanthine levels were assayed from samples collected before and 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 3.0 h after caffeine capsule and cola treatments and, additionally, at 4.0 and 6.0 h after theobromine capsule and chocolate treatments. Results: Caffeine plasma concentrations increased rapidly and peaked at approximately 30 min following both capsule treatments 1 (Cmax: 1.93 μg ⋅ ml−1); and 2 (Cmax: 2.05 μg ⋅ ml−1). Relative to capsules, caffeine absorption from cola and chocolate was delayed and produced lower maximum caffeine plasma concentrations which peaked 1.5–2.0 h after treatment (For cola, Cmax: 1.57 μg ⋅ ml−1); and for chocolate, Cmax: 1.50 μg ⋅ ml−1. Theobromine plasma concentrations peaked approximately 3 h after capsule administration (Cmax: 6.72 μg ⋅ ml−1). Relative to capsules, theobromine absorption from chocolate was more rapid and produced higher maximum theobromine plasma concentrations which peaked approximately 2 h after treatment (Cmax: 8.05 μg ⋅ ml−1). Conclusions: The results suggest that a usual dietary portion of the cola or chocolate used in this study would produce behaviorally discriminable plasma levels of caffeine in most subjects and of theobromine in at least one subject.

Theobromine versus placebo discrimination and caffeine versus placebo discrimination were studied in two consecutive experiments in seven volunteers who abstained from methylxanthines. Daily sessions involved PO double-blind ingestion of two sets of capsules sequentially, one of which contained drug and the other placebo. Subjects attempted to identify, and were later informed, which set of capsules contained the drug. In each experiment subjects were exposed to progressively lower doses. Five subjects acquired the theobromine discrimination; the lowest dose discriminated ranged from 100 to 560 mg. All seven subjects acquired the caffeine discrimination; the lowest dose discriminated ranged from 1.8 to 178 mg. A final experiment evaluated subjective effect ratings following 560 mg theobromine, 178 mg caffeine and placebo, which were administered double-blind in capsules once daily, five times each in mixed sequence. Caffeine produced changes in both group and individual ratings (e.g. increased well-being, energy, social disposition and alert). Theobromine did not produce changes in group ratings but changed ratings in some subjects. Across subjects, sensitivity to caffeine discriminative effects in the discrimination experiment correlated significantly with the number and magnitude of caffeine subjective effects in the final experiment. This study documents modest discriminative effects of theobromine in humans, but the basis of the discrimination is unclear. This study suggests that commonly consumed cocoa products contain behaviorally active doses of caffeine and possibly theobromine.

This paper provides a methodological survey of research of 1253 experiments on the acute effects of drugs used for non-medical purposes on human performance. 305 different tasks were tested, but only 118 tasks were used in more than two experiments. While the majority of experiments did have control conditions and measured drug effects at more than one time point after drug administration, they varied widely on other protocol details: (1) subject populations, (2) training on the tasks prior to drug administration, and (3) number of active test doses that were tested. Administration of stimulants either had no effect, or improved performance. In contrast, administration of marijuana, alcohol, or benzodiazepines had no effect, or impaired performance. In order to maximize comparability and utility, future protocols should use control groups, train subjects prior to participation, test more than one drug dose, and test performance before, and several times after, drug administration. A greater range of subject populations should also be studied. Finally, task standardization including type of instructions to subjects, duration of performance testing, feedback to subjects, motivational conditions, and inclusion of a benchmark task should also be used to enhance comparisons across studies.

People who stop consuming caffeine may have symptoms, but the incidence and severity of caffeine withdrawal are not known. This study was performed to determine the effects in the general population of ending one's dietary intake of caffeine.We studied 62 normal adults whose intake of caffeine was low to moderate (mean amount, 235 mg--the equivalent of 2.5 cups of coffee--per day). They completed questionnaires about symptoms and tests of their mood and performance when consuming their normal diets (base-line period) and at the end of each of two two-day periods during which they consumed caffeine-free diets and under double-blind conditions received capsules containing placebo (placebo period) or caffeine (caffeine period) in amounts equal to their daily caffeine consumption.More subjects had abnormally high Beck Depression Inventory scores (11 percent), high scores on the trait scale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (8 percent), low vigor scores (11 percent) and high fatigue scores (8 percent) on the Profile of Mood States, and moderate or severe headache (52 percent) during the placebo period than during either the base-line period (2, 0, 0, 0, and 2 percent, respectively; P less than 0.05) or the caffeine period (3, 2, 2, 0, and 6 percent; P less than 0.05). More subjects reported unauthorized use of medications during the placebo period (13 percent) than during the caffeine period (2 percent, P = 0.017). Performance of a tapping task was slower during the placebo period than during the base-line and caffeine periods (P less than 0.01).Persons who consume low or moderate amounts of caffeine may have a withdrawal syndrome after their daily consumption of caffeine ceases.

Thirty-two healthy subjects with histories of moderate caffeine consumption abstained from dietary caffeine throughout the study. Subjects were stratified into two groups based on several factors including caffeine preference, which was assessed using a caffeine versus placebo choice procedure. Subsequently, subjects received either caffeine (300 mg t.i.d.) or placebo (placebo t.i.d.) for 18 consecutive days, and thereafter were exposed again to a caffeine versus placebo choice procedure. The study documented tolerance development to the subjective effects of caffeine: after chronic dosing, administration of caffeine produced significant subjective effects in the chronic placebo group but not in the chronic caffeine group. The study also provided indirect evidence for tolerance development: during chronic dosing, the chronic caffeine and placebo groups did not differ meaningfully on ratings of mood and subjective effect. When subjects were categorized into caffeine choosers or nonchoosers, caffeine choosers tended to report positive subjective effects of caffeine and negative subjective effects of placebo. Nonchoosers, in contrast, tended to report negative subjective effects of caffeine. Chronic caffeine did not alter the reinforcing effects of caffeine as assessed by caffeine versus placebo choice, possibly because the relatively short duration of caffeine abstinence in the placebo condition was not sufficient to result in maximal withdrawal effects after termination of the relatively high caffeine dose. This study provides the clearest evidence to date of complete tolerance development to a CNS effect of caffeine in humans.

Studies have shown that alcohol expectancies are positively associated with drinking and alcohol abuse and dependence symptoms among alcohol users. This study looked at the relationship of alcohol expectancies, family history of alcoholism, menstrual cycle and drinking behavior. The present study compared alcohol expectancies using the Alcohol Expectancy Questionnaire (AEQ) in 85 women ranging from 18 to 35 years of age. Forty-one women had a confirmed parental history of alcoholism (family history positive, FHP) and 44 women had no parental history of alcoholism (family history negative, FHN). Participants' mood, alcohol consumption, and daily consequences of alcohol use were prospectively tracked across one menstrual cycle. Alcohol expectancies at screening were significantly greater in FHP women in four of the six AEQ subscales, as well as the composite score. Alcohol expectancies correlated significantly with drinking behavior among FHN women. In FHP women, alcohol expectancies were elevated regardless of their drinking level. Alcohol expectancies decreased among FHP women, but not FHN women, after prospectively tracking their drinking behavior and consequences of drinking. Negative outcomes of drinking were increased among the FHP women who were heavy drinkers. Irrespective of family history status, alcohol use in moderate drinkers increased significantly during menses compared to the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. These findings suggest that menstrual cycle may also play a role in alcohol consumption. Thus, the results of the present study indicate that issues related to the level of alcohol consumption, menstrual cycle phase and family history of alcoholism should be considered when addressing alcohol abuse in women.

Ingestive behavior consists of appetitive or foraging behavior, i.e., “acquisition,” followed by consummatory behavior. Responding of six adult rhesus monkeys, living in three-chambered enclosures, was studied under an operant chain schedule that simulated commodity acquisition and commodity consumption. Responding during the initial acquisition component was reinforced by stimuli paired with that commodity, while responding during the following consumption component was reinforced with that commodity. Throughout the 10-h experimental day, monkeys experienced multiple candy (plain M & Ms) and fruit-drink (Kool-Aid) sessions in different end chambers. The effects of response-independent candy reinforcement, in the context of extinction, were examined when monkeys received a daily food ration of 8 or 20 chow. Response-independent candy increased responding during the acquisition components of candy sessions when monkeys received a daily food ration of 8 chow but not when the food ration was 20 chow. Furthermore, response-independent candy increased candy choice over fruit-drink during choice opportunities and increased the length of time spent in the candy chamber when the candy stimulus lights were illuminated under both food ration conditions, i.e., location preference. The present procedure, which combines operant and place preference measures of commodity acquisition, when used in combination with methods of studying reinstatement of responding, may prove useful in analyzing factors affecting relapse.

Rationale: Although common in humans, little is known about the reinforcing efficacy of smoked heroin in laboratory animals. Objectives: To evaluate the reinforcing efficacy of smoked heroin in non-opioid dependent, non-human primates. Methods: Self-administration and location-preference measures were obtained by having monkeys live in two chambers with heroin self-administration (0, 0.3, 0.6 mg/kg; eight dosings available per day) specific to one chamber and no commodity available in the other chamber. Operant responding reinforced by smoked heroin provided a self-administration measure of reinforcement, and the length of time monkeys spent in the heroin-associated chamber provided a location preference estimate of reinforcing efficacy. Results: Four of six monkeys acquired heroin self-administration: these monkeys completed six to eight smoking trials each day when either of the active heroin doses was available. Urine toxicology confirmed that monkeys were absorbing the smoked heroin. The number of completed smoking trials rapidly decreased under extinction conditions, indicating that smoked heroin was an efficacious reinforcer using the self-administration measure. Monkeys developed a location preference for the chamber where heroin was self-administered, indicating that smoked heroin was an efficacious reinforcer using the location-preference measure. Conclusions: Smoked heroin is an efficacious reinforcer in non-opioid dependent rhesus monkeys as measured using a self-administration procedure and estimated using a location-preference procedure.

This study determined if women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMS) showed impaired mood and performance when they were experiencing their premenstrual symptoms, and if the effects of alprazolam varied as a function of menstrual cycle phase. Under double-blind conditions, the acute effects of placebo and alprazolam (0.25, 0.50, 0.75 mg) were tested during both luteal and follicular phases. Women with confirmed PMS experienced substantial changes in mood as a function of menstrual cycle phase. However, under controlled laboratory conditions, acute doses of alprazolam did not improve negative premenstrual mood, but rather increased negative mood in the follicular phase. Alprazolam impaired task performance, although this impairment was generally similar in both phases when baseline phase differences were taken into consideration. Consistent with the failure of alprazolam to improve mood premenstrually, subjective measures indicative of abuse liability were not increased following alprazolam. Taken together, these data suggest that acute administration of alprazolam doses are not clinically useful for the treatment of PMS.

The purpose of this study was to determine if multiple aspects of drug and food-reinforced behavior could be measured in a single study. Drug or food seeking can be observed under four conditions: 1) internal drug or food cues and external stimulus cues present; self-administration, 2) only internal cues present; priming, 3) no internal or external stimulus cues present; abstinence, and 4) no internal cues, but external stimulus cues present; extinction. Six adult rhesus monkeys lived in three-chambered enclosures: fluid (0.26, 0.52 mg/kg per delivery cocaine hydrochloride, sweetened-vehicle, or water)- related cues and oral fluid self-administration were specific to one end chamber, food pellet-related cues and food self-administration were specific to the other end chamber, and no food cues or fluid cues were available in the middle chamber. Throughout the 10-h experimental day, monkeys experienced multiple food, fluid, and stimulus-cue test sessions. Adding cocaine to the vehicle initially increased fluid intake during training (condition 1), but vehicle intake did not return to baseline levels after cocaine was later removed (condition 4). Monkeys developed a location preference for the fluid chamber, even when fluid was not available, when responding was reinforced by cocaine, but not when responding was reinforced by vehicle (condition 3). Non-contingent food or fluid delivery did not increase responding in non-deprived animals (condition 2). The current protocol provides both self-administration and place-preference measures of the motivational effects of drugs. Given that human drug abusers spend much time thinking about and seeking drugs prior to actual self-administration, an animal model that uses multiple measures of drug seeking may be useful in the preclinical testing of pharmacological adjuncts for the treatment of drug abuse.