Search

Ablation of atrial tachycardias arising from the superior portion of Crista Terminalis may be risky because of the possibility to injure the right phrenic nerve. Although few techniques for phrenic nerve displacement have been reported, their execution can be difficult, timeconsuming and expose the patient to further complications related to epicardial puncture. In our case, radiofrequency catheter ablation from the right superior pulmonary vein allowed us to successfully treat the arrhythmia without hampering the phrenic nerve integrity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate the role of anatomical characteristics of the pulmonary veins (PVs) determining cooling kinetics during second‐generation cryoballoon ablation (CbA). Methods and Results: we enrolled all consecutive patients who underwent CbA for symptomatic atrial fibrillation in our center from January 2019 to March 2019. All patients had complete computed tomography scans of the heart before the ablation. Anatomical characteristics were tested for prediction of a nadir temperature (NT) ≤ −48°C. Significant differences were noted among PV max diameter (20.8 ± 2.8 vs 18.5 ± 2.5 mm; P <.001); PV minimum diameter (15.2 ± 3.0 vs 13.0 ± 3.1 mm; P <.001); PV area (268.1 ± 71.9 vs 206.2 ± 58.7 mm2; P <.001); PV ovality (1.4 ± 0.3 vs 1.5 ± 0.3; P =.005); and PV trunk length (27.4 ± 7.4 vs 21.3 ± 6.5 mm; P <.001). A scoring system was created by assigning one point each ranging from 0 (best anatomical combination) to 5. In the group with a score of 0, 94.0% of the CbA could reach a NT ≤ −48°C whereas with a score of 5, only 29.0% (P <.001). Left superior pulmonary vein with short trunk length and acute angle of PV branch was significantly associated with warmer NT (11.8% satisfactory CbA; P =.003). Regarding right inferior pulmonary vein, trunk length (P =.004), maximum diameter (P =.044), and transverse angle (P =.008) were independently associated with good NT. Conclusion: Anatomical PV features are associated with cooling kinetics and an anatomical score could predict lower NT during second‐generation CbA. Specific characteristics were identified for inferior PV. Although heart imaging is not mandatory prior CbA, it can be a useful tool to predict cooling kinetics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The aim of our study is to compare two approaches of implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) implantation, conventional (supra/subpectoral) and subcostal in young adults in terms of procedural complications and adverse events encountered during follow-up.Methods and Results: From January 2007 to December 2013, all patients under the age of 50 years who received an ICD in our centre were included in this study. Patient's hospital records were analysed for procedural complications and adverse events during follow-up until December 2014. Data from device on first interrogation after implantation and on follow-up were also noted. A total of 106 patients of which 40.6% had Brugada's syndrome (65.1% male, age 33.6 ± 10.97 years) were included in analysis; 71 (61%) had ICD placed in (sub/supra) pectoral and 35 (33%) in subcostal position. Only seven patients received an epicardial lead system. During the follow-up period of 2.1 ± 1.8 years, 84.90% of the patients had no adverse events. Most of the complications, procedural and during follow-up, occur in conventionally placed, pectoral ICD. Lead follow-up data in both groups, conventional and subcostal, showed no difference in right ventricular (RV) shock impedance and R wave sensing, P-value = 0.56 and 0.77, respectively. Lead survival was 95 and 97%, respectively, in conventional and subcostal groups over a mean follow-up of 2.1 ± 1.8 years. Log-rank test for lead survival was not significant in terms of site of implantation.Conclusion: To the best our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating subcostal ICD placement in young adults and resulting in equivalent to better outcomes when compared with conventionally placed pectoral ICD. Subcostal ICD placement might be considered an alternative option in young adults as it results in better procedural outcomes and also comparable rate of adverse events during follow-up, but bigger studies with a larger number of patients are needed for a definitive conclusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The second-generation cryoballoon (CB-Adv) is effective in achieving pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with encouraging results. In this study, we assessed the single-procedure outcome on a 1-year follow-up period in a large sample of patients having undergone PVI for drug-resistant atrial fibrillation (AF) using the CB-Adv.Methods and Results: A total of 393 patients (122 female, 31%; mean age 57.7 ± 12.9 years) with drug-refractory AF undergoing PVI using the novel CB-Adv were enrolled. Follow-up was based on outpatient clinic visits including Holter electrocardiograms. Recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATas) was defined as a symptomatic or documented episode >30 s. A total of 1572 pulmonary veins (PVs) were identified and successfully isolated with 1.2 ± 0.3 mean freezes. Mean procedure and fluoroscopy times were 87.1 ± 38.2 and 14.9 ± 6.1 min, respectively. At a mean follow-up of 12 months, freedom from ATas after a single procedure was achieved in 85.8% of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and in 61.3% of patients with persistent AF (persAF). Similar success rates were observed between bonus freeze and single freeze strategies, 82.5 and 81.8%, respectively (P = 0.9). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that persAF (P = 0.04) and relapses during blanking period (BP) (P < 0.0001) were independent predictors of ATas recurrences.Conclusion: Freedom from any ATa can be achieved in 81.9% of patients after a single CB-Adv procedure in a large cohort of patients. A bonus freeze does not influence the clinical outcome, and reducing the duration of the cryoapplication to 3 min offers excellent results. Persistent AF and arrhythmia recurrence during the BP are strong predictors of AF recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Single 3 vs. Double 4 Strategy in CB ablation Introduction Second-generation cryoballoon (CB-Adv) ablation is highly effective in achieving pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with promising mid-term clinical outcome. However, the ideal freezing strategy is still under debate. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a single 3-minute approach compared to the conventional 4-minute plus bonus application using CB-Adv. Methods and Results One hundred and sixty patients (67% male; mean age 58.0 ± 13.3 years) underwent PVI using CB-Adv for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Among 160 patients, 80 received a single 3-minute approach (3-mns group), while the remaining 80 conventional 4-minute plus bonus-freeze (4-mns group). Mean procedure and fluoroscopy times were 90.6 ± 15.8 and 18.3 ± 6.9 in the 4-mns group, 75.2 ± 17.1 and 13.5 ± 8.7 in the 3-mns group (P < 0.001, respectively). First-freeze isolation rate was 91.6% in the 4- versus 90.6% in the 3-mns group (P = 0.78). Persistent phrenic nerve palsy (PNP) occurred in 6/80 (3.5%) in the 4-mns group and 4/80 in the 3-mns group (P = 0.75). The overall freedom from ATas 2 years after the procedure was 78.1% (125/160): 77.5% (62/80 patients) in the 3-mns and 78.8% (63/80 patients) in the 4-mns group (P = 0.82). In multivariate analysis, time to PVI and nadir temperature independently predicted ATa recurrences (P < 0.001). Conclusions CB-Adv ablation for PAF is highly effective, resulting in 78% 2-year freedom from arrhythmic recurrences. A 'single 3-minute strategy' showed equal efficacy as compared to the conventional 4-minute plus bonus freeze approach at 2-year follow-up, providing shorter procedure and fluoroscopy time. Nadir temperature and time to PVI were predictors of arrhythmic recurrences. 'Bonus-freeze' strategy might be unnecessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. The novel Polarx™ cryoablation system is currently being studied for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. To the best of our knowledge, no study comparing the novel cryoablation system with the standard Arctic Front™ cryoballoon is available in today's literature. This study aims to compare Polarx™ and Arctic Front™ cryoballoon in terms of safety and efficacy. Methods. From a total cohort of 202 patients who underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for paroxysmal AF through cryoablation, a population of 30 patients who used Polarx™ were compared with 30 propensity-score matched patients who used Arctic Front™. Results. Pulmonary vein occlusion and electrical isolation were achieved in all (100%) veins with a mean number of 1.09 ± 0.3 occlusion per vein using Polarx™ and 1.19 ± 0.5 occlusion per vein using Arctic Front™ (p = 0.6). Shorter procedure and fluoroscopy time were observed with Polarx™ group (60.5 ± 14.23 vs 73.43 ± 13.26 mins, p = 0.001; 12.83 ± 6.03 vs 17.23 ± 7.17 mins, p = 0.01, respectively). Lower cumulative freeze duration per vein was also observed with Polarx™ (203.38 ± 72.03 vs 224.9 ± 79.35 mins, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in isolation time between the two groups (34.47 ± 21.23 vs 34.18 ± 26.79 secs, p = 0.9). Conclusion. The novel Polarx™ cryoablation system showed similar efficacy in vein occlusion and isolation and safety profile when compared to Arctic Front™ cryoablation system. Procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and cumulative freeze duration were significantly lower with Polarx™ cryoablation system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]