1. Happier with less?:Members of European environmental grassroots initiatives reconcile lower carbon footprints with higher life satisfaction and income increases
- Author
-
Giuseppe Carrus, Adina Dumitru, Gibran Vita, Richard Wood, Ricardo García-Mira, Konstantin Stadler, Diana Ivanova, Edgar G. Hertwich, Karen Krause, Department of Environmental Sciences, RS-Research Line Resilience (part of LIRS program), Vita, G., Ivanova, D., Dumitru, A., Garcia-Mira, R., Carrus, G., Stadler, K., Krause, K., Wood, R., and Hertwich, E. G.
- Subjects
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,IMPACT ,INNOVATION ,DEMAND ,010501 environmental sciences ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration|Environmental Policy ,01 natural sciences ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Political Science ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Political Science|Other Political Science ,QUALITY-OF-LIFE ,MINDFULNESS ,Sustainable consumption ,double dividend ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Environmental Studies ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Economics ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Anthropology ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Economics|Behavioral Economics ,Clothing ,WELL ,HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Experimental Analysis of Behavior ,Fuel Technology ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Economics|Behavioral Economics ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Social Psychology ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology ,carbon footprint ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Economics ,GREEN ,Energy Engineering and Power Technology ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Political Science ,MITIGATION ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Social Psychology ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Experimental Analysis of Behavior ,Footprint ,grassroots initiatives ,Grassroots ,grassroots initiative ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Political Science|Other Political Science ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Anthropology|Social and Cultural Anthropology ,life satisfaction ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Anthropology ,Consumption (economics) ,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment ,business.industry ,Life satisfaction ,sustainable consumption ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Anthropology|Social and Cultural Anthropology ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Environmental Studies ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration|Environmental Policy ,Nuclear Energy and Engineering ,volunteers ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences ,Carbon footprint ,Demographic economics ,SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences ,Business ,Social Sciences (miscellaneous) - Abstract
Scientists and policymakers recognize the need to address consumption and lifestyles in order to reconcile environmental and development agendas. Sustainability-oriented grassroots initiatives emerge bottom-up to create opportunities for sustainable lifestyles; yet no prior assessment has ascertained the efficacy of their members to reduce carbon footprints (CF) and enhance well-being. We compare the CF of non-members and members of grassroots initiatives in the domains of food, clothing, housing and transport. We further compare the groups by testing the influence of socio-economic variables that are typically associated with both footprint and well-being. Here we show that grassroots initiative members have 16% lower total carbon footprint, and 43% and 86% lower carbon footprints for food and clothing respectively, compared to their “non-member” regional socio-demographic counterparts. We find a higher adoption of some energy-saving behaviors for initiative members such as greater active travel distance and lower indoor temperatures in the winter, yet no significant differences in the CF of housing and transport. Interestingly, increases in income are not associated with increases in the total CF of members, while the influence of income is confirmed for the CF of the total sample. Instead, factors such as age, household size, and gender better explain the variation in the domain-specific CFs of initiative members. Finally, members show higher life satisfaction compared to non-members and are 11–13% more likely to evaluate their life positively. Our results suggest that initiative members uncover lifestyle features that not only enable lower emissions, but also reconcile emissions with income and well-being.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF