Search

Byline: Nikita. Shrivastava, Divya. Aggarwal, Rahul. Jena A 67-year-old male was incidentally found to have a large left perinephric mass with a poorly functioning left kidney. A differential diagnosis of [...]

Introduction: We present our initial experience with robot-assisted reconstructive surgeries with the Da Vinci Xi robotic system for benign ureteric pathologies. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent robot-assisted reconstructive procedures for benign diseases of the ureter at our department from April 2018 to November 2022. Demographic and perioperative details were recorded. Patients were followed up and surgical success was evaluated on the basis of symptomatic, functional, and radiological improvement. Results: A total of 34 patients underwent robot-assisted reconstructions for benign ureteric pathologies by various techniques. Mean age, body mass index (BMI), hospital stay and follow-up duration were 36 years, 24.1 kg/m2, 5.29 days, and 7.08 months respectively. Procedures included pyeloplasty in eight, primary ureteroneocystostomy (UNC) in seven, Psoas hitch UNC in five, Boari flap UNC in six, Ureteroureterostomy in four, ureterocalicostomy in two and ileal ureteral transposition in two patients. Mean docking time, total operative time, and estimated blood loss were 31.5 min, 178 min, and 64.3 ml, respectively. All patients had radiologic or functional improvement on follow-up after 6 months. Conclusion: Robot-assisted reconstructive surgery for benign ureteric and bladder pathologies imparted excellent short-term outcomes without major complications with all the advantages of a minimally invasive approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: There is an unmet need for high-quality data for Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in the Indian population. Indian study group on partial nephrectomy (ISGPN) is a consortium of Indian centers contributing to the partial nephrectomy (PN) database. The current study is a descriptive analysis of perioperative and functional outcomes following RAPN. Methods: For this study, the retrospective ISGPN database was reviewed, which included patients who underwent RAPN for renal masses at 14 centers across India from September 2010 to September 2022. Demographic, clinical, radiological, perioperative, and functional data were collected and analyzed. Ethics approval was obtained from each of the participating centers. Results: In this study, 782 patients were included, and 69.7% were male. The median age was 53 years (interquartile range [IQR 44-62]), median operative time was 180 min (IQR 133-240), median estimated blood loss was 100 mL (IQR 50-200), mean warm ischemia time was 22.7 min and positive surgical margin rates were 2.5%. The complication rate was 16.2%, and most of them were of minor grade. Trifecta and pentafecta outcomes were attained in 61.4% and 60% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: This is the largest Indian multi-centric study using the Indian Robotic PN Collaborative database to evaluate the outcomes of robot assisted PN, and has proven its safety and efficacy in the management of renal masses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Bladder diary is an integral part of urologic evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms. One of its limitations is the requirement of a literate patient or attendant to complete it. We propose a novel method for recording bladder diary in illiterate individuals, with the aid of easily available materials from hospital, without any expenditure from the patients. Methods: Forty-nine patients, who were required to fill the bladder diary as a part of their urological assessment, and were either illiterate or not literate enough to complete it themselves, were enrolled and admitted in the urology ward for 1 and a half days. Patients were provided with two 500 mL empty normal saline bottles for collection of each void, and a chart separately for day and night with diagrams of saline bottles to mark the corresponding level of urine. The amount of urine and frequency was also noted simultaneously by nursing staff each time for 24 h. The investigator interpreted the data marked on the charts by the patient and compared it with the data collected by the nursing officers. Results: No statistically significant difference was found between the data collected by the nursing staff and patient data interpreted by the investigators, which included 24-h urine volume(p = 0.562), nocturnal output (p = 0.941), average voided volume (p = 0.709), maximum voided volume (p = 0.369), fluid intake (p = 0.401), frequency, nocturia and episodes of urgency and incontinence (p = 1). Conclusion: This method of recording bladder diary is a feasible, genuine, reliable and cost-free method which can be used in illiterates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A man in his 50s presented with right flank pain and intermittent haematuria for 15 days. He was evaluated and diagnosed to have bilateral staghorn renal calculi with left poorly functioning kidney. He underwent right kidney stone clearance followed by laparoscopic left simple nephrectomy. Postoperatively, he developed recurrent urinary tract infections. On evaluation, noncontrast CT of the abdomen revealed calculus in left ureteral stump and he was diagnosed to have ureteric stump syndrome. He underwent ureteroscopy which revealed multiple stump calculi and complete stone clearance was achieved. Currently, the patient is asymptomatic and doing well after a follow-up of 1 year. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This document is a reply to a letter published in the World Journal of Urology. The authors of the reply address the queries raised by the authors of the letter regarding their study on the comparison of transperitoneal (TP) and retroperitoneal (RP) robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). The authors clarify that they followed the recommended guidelines for literature search and used the appropriate statistical model for their study. They also explain that their study focused on perioperative outcomes and was not powered to evaluate oncological outcomes. The authors confirm the accuracy of the author names and affiliations and declare no conflicts of interest. [Extracted from the article]

Introduction: The majority of the open access publishing allows the researchers to publish their articles for a fee and at the same time enables the readers to access the research without paying the expensive journal subscription charges. Under the garb of open access publishing, predatory journals run a scam to dupe the researchers of money. This study was conducted to highlight the characteristics of pseudojournals and increase the awareness about their modus operandi. Methods: The email inboxes of 3 academic urologists (APS, AS, and KP) were searched for emails soliciting articles for open access journals. A list of all such journals was compiled. These journals were checked for metrics from the Journal Citation Reports and the Scimago Journal Rankings. All these journals were then cross-checked with the available whitelists and blacklists. Features pointing toward a pseudo journal were identified as red flag signs for these journals and were noted. A literature search was performed on open access publishing and predatory journals, and the salient points were noted. A checklist of red flag signs was compiled. Results: A total of 71 emails soliciting article submissions from 68 journals were received by the three urologists (APS, AS, KP). Of these, 54 were highly suggestive of being a pseudojournal, 5 journals were operating in the gray zone between genuine open access journals and outright predatory journals, and 9 were genuine open access journals. A total of 33 articles on predatory journals were reviewed after the literature search as per the PRISMA guidelines. The red flag signs identified along with the literature review were used to create the SAFEiMAP checklist, which can be used to identify predatory journals. Conclusion: Predatory journals have infiltrated the whitelists, and the indexing databases like PubMed and no blacklist is all-inclusive. Understanding the concept and the types of open access publishing gives the researchers a better idea on how to differentiate fake journals from the genuine ones. Using a checklist will help to identify the red flag signs of such journals and identify those journals that operate in the gray zone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]