Search

Line Dyreborg,1,2 Sabine Michelsen Raunbak,2 Sabrina Storgaard Sørensen,2 Dorte Melgaard,3– 5 Signe Westmark1 1Centre for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark; 2Danish Center for Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark; 3North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark; 4Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark; 5Mech-sense, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, DenmarkCorrespondence: Signe Westmark, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Bispensgade 37, Hjørring, DK-9800, Denmark, Tel +45 2041 6541, Email s.westmark@rn.dkPurpose: This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of chin tuck against resistance (CTAR) for citizens suffering from dysphagia compared to the standard municipal treatment in Denmark.Patients and Methods: A cost-utility analysis, employing a municipal perspective, was conducted using cost data collected alongside clinical data of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of CTAR training for citizens with dysphagia. The composition of the clinical randomized controlled trial, which included citizens with different diagnoses, means that participants had different disease courses. Ninety-two citizens from seven different Danish municipalities were enrolled, of whom 43 received standard care, and 49 received CTAR in addition to standard care. The effect outcome of the economic evaluation was quality-adjusted life years (QALY), estimated using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Individual resource consumption of each citizen was determined based on the use of home care, home nursing care, physio- and occupational therapy, dietitian guidance, and hospital admissions. The incremental costs and QALYs between the intervention group (CTAR in addition to standard care) and standard care group were estimated using regression analysis, and sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate the robustness of the results.Results: The base case analysis showed that the intervention group was dominant compared to the standard care group, with a decrease in incremental costs of £ 542.38 and an increase in incremental QALYs of 0.0118. All sensitivity analyses demonstrated similar findings as the base case analysis, supporting the robustness of the results.Conclusion: This study found that the intervention group was the dominant alternative, hence being more effective and cost-saving, compared to the standard care group in a Danish municipality perspective with a three-month time horizon. This study adds to the scarce evidence on the cost-effectiveness of CTAR in a Danish clinical setting, but further studies should focus on estimating long-term cost-effectiveness.Keywords: cost-utility analysis, exercise, swallowing disorders, municipality, quality of life

Sabrina Storgaard Sørensen,1 Kjeld Møller Pedersen,1 Ulla Møller Weinreich,2,3 Lars Holger Ehlers,1 1Danish Center for Healthcare Improvements, Faculty of Social Sciences and Faculty of Health Sciences, Aalborg University, Aalborg East, Denmark; 2Department of Respiratory Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; 3The Clinical Institute, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark Background: Case management interventions are recommended to improve quality of care and reduce costs in chronic care, but further evidence on effectiveness and cost-effectiveness is needed. The objective of this study is the reporting of the design and participant enrollment of a randomized controlled trial, conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a community-based case management model for patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). With a focus on support for self-care and care coordination, the intervention was hypothesized to result in a reduced number of COPD-related hospital admissions. Patients and methods: The design was a randomized controlled trial conducted from 2012 to 2014 with randomization and intervention at patient level. The study took place in Aalborg Municipality, a larger municipality in Denmark. A total of 150 COPD patients were randomized into two groups: the case-managed group and the usual-care group. Participant characteristics were obtained at baseline, and measures on effectiveness and costs were obtained through questionnaires and registries within a 12-month follow-up period. In the forthcoming analysis, effectiveness will be evaluated on COPD-related hospital admissions, mortality, health- related quality of life, and self-care. An economic evaluation will examine the cost-effectiveness of case management against current usual care from the perspective of the health care sector. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups except for the prevalence of cancer, which were borderline significantly higher in the case-managed group. This baseline difference will be adjusted for in the final analysis. A very low dropout rate for the intervention was observed, indicating that the intervention was well accepted. Conclusion: Presented in a forthcoming paper, the results of the study will provide new evidence to the future organization of case management. Keywords: personalized care, disease management, health-related quality of life, cost-effectiveness analysis

Bone scintigraphy results were compared with changes shown on orthopantomographic radiographs in a patient with facial asymmetry, before, during, and after Herbst treatment, and followed up with control of growth activity in the temporomandibular joints (TMJs) after long-term retention. The present study showed that new bone formation (modelling) was initiated asymmetrically in TMJs during treatment. The results indicate that late development of right/left asymmetry in the occlusion can be corrected and normalized using the Herbst appliance therapy, stimulating a differentiated 'catch up' growth (modelling) in the TMJ with condyles. After treatment, original growth with asymmetric activity in the TMJ was re-established. This growth activity may re-establish the asymmetry in the sagittal occlusion and the face of the patient. It is therefore recommended that the occlusion should be maintained with an appliance which stabilizes the occlusion until cessation of the primary, endochondral growth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Due to their vasodilatory effect, calcium antagonist may have a renoprotective against cyclosporin (CsA)-induced nephrotoxicity and rise in blood pressure (BP) seen in renal transplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]