Search

Objectives. To compare pregnancy-related mortality ratios (PRMRs) associated with COVID-19 by race/ethnicity, by region of residence, and in states with and without Medicaid expansion. Methods. We used 2020–2021 data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research in our analysis. We stratified PRMRs by race/ethnicity, census regions, and Medicaid expansion and nonexpansion states. Results. The 2020–2021 PRMR was 40.3 per 100 000 live births. American Indian/ Alaska Native pregnant people had the greatest PRMR, followed by non-Hispanic Blacks and non-Hispanic Native Hawaiians/other Pacific Islanders. PRMRs associated with COVID-19 in the southern region were at least 2 times higher than in other regions and were highest for all pregnant people in the various racial/ethnic groups. PRMRs associated with COVID-19 were lower in Medicaid expansion states than in nonexpansion states. Conclusions. The US COVID-19 epidemic exacerbated racial and ethnic disparities in pregnancy-related mortality. Public Health Implications. The alarming increase in disparities among racial and ethnic pregnant people during the COVID-19 pandemic underscores the need to address social determinants of health at the structural level. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(S9): S723–S730. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307814) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The long-term reproductive health impact of cancer treatments is a concern for premenopausal women with a history of breast cancer. This study examined the unmet sexual and reproductive health needs of breast cancer survivors, as well as concordances and discordances in needs by childbearing status and race. We interviewed 17 women diagnosed with breast cancer between the ages of 18 and 45 years and living in North Carolina. To analyze these data, we used the Sort and Sift, Think and Shift© method, a multidimensional qualitative analysis approach. We learned that breast cancer survivors (a) received limited reproductive health information, (b) desired realistic expectations of conceiving postcancer, (c) struggled with adjusting to their altered physical appearance, and (d) had menopause symptoms that led to sexual health and quality of life issues. Breast cancer survivors are in need of and desire more education and resources to address their sexual and reproductive health concerns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Existing health disparities frameworks do not adequately incorporate unique interacting contributing factors leading to health inequities among African Americans, resulting in public health stakeholders’ inability to translate these frameworks into practice. Methods We developed dimensionality and R4P to integrate multiple theoretical perspectives into a framework of action to eliminate health inequities experienced by African Americans. Results The dimensional framework incorporates Critical Race Theory and intersectionality, and includes dimensions of time—past, present and future. Dimensionality captures the complex linear and non-linear array of influences that cause health inequities, but these pathways do not lend themselves to approaches to developing empirically derived programs, policies and interventions to promote health equity. R4P provides a framework for addressing the scope of actions needed. The five components of R4P are (1) Remove, (2) Repair, (3) Remediate, (4) Restructure and (5) Provide. Conclusion R4P is designed to translate complex causality into a public health equity planning, assessment, evaluation and research tool. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This paper is a historical account of an initiative, as recalled by the authors who were directly involved, that brought to the forefront the long-standing and unjust reproductive health inequities in the United States. It is composed of three distinct but interrelated parts that together map the past, present, and future of addressing racial inequities in Maternal and Child Health.This paper is composed of three distinct but interrelated parts that together map the past, present, and future of addressing racial inequities in Maternal and Child Health. Part I recounts the history and achievements of a Centers for Disease for Control and Prevention initiative in the 1980–90’s, led by the Prematurity Research Group in the Division of Reproductive Health, Pregnancy and Infant Health Branch. This initiative stimulated a paradigm shift in how we understand and address black infant mortality and the inequities in this outcome. Part II illustrates examples of some exemplary programmatic and policy legacies that stemmed either directly or indirectly from the Centers for Disease for Control and Prevention paradigm shift. Part III provides a discussion of how effectively the current practice in Maternal and Child Health applies this paradigm to address inequities and proposes a path for accelerating Title V agencies’ progress toward birth equity.This CDC initiative was transformative in that it raised the visibility of African American researchers, moved the field from a focus on traditional epidemiologic risks such as personal health promotion and medical interventions, to include racism as a risk factor for inequitable birth outcomes. The paradigm examined the specific roles of historical and structural racism, and the racialized, contextualized, and temporal exposures that are unique to Black women’s experiences in the United States.The initiative radically changed the narratives about the underlying factors contributing to inequities in birth outcomes of Black women, altered the way we currently approach addressing inequities, and holds the keys for transforming practice to a more holistic and systematic approach to building sustained organizational structures in maternal and child health that accelerate the achievement of birth equity.Description: This paper is a historical account of an initiative, as recalled by the authors who were directly involved, that brought to the forefront the long-standing and unjust reproductive health inequities in the United States. It is composed of three distinct but interrelated parts that together map the past, present, and future of addressing racial inequities in Maternal and Child Health.This paper is composed of three distinct but interrelated parts that together map the past, present, and future of addressing racial inequities in Maternal and Child Health. Part I recounts the history and achievements of a Centers for Disease for Control and Prevention initiative in the 1980–90’s, led by the Prematurity Research Group in the Division of Reproductive Health, Pregnancy and Infant Health Branch. This initiative stimulated a paradigm shift in how we understand and address black infant mortality and the inequities in this outcome. Part II illustrates examples of some exemplary programmatic and policy legacies that stemmed either directly or indirectly from the Centers for Disease for Control and Prevention paradigm shift. Part III provides a discussion of how effectively the current practice in Maternal and Child Health applies this paradigm to address inequities and proposes a path for accelerating Title V agencies’ progress toward birth equity.This CDC initiative was transformative in that it raised the visibility of African American researchers, moved the field from a focus on traditional epidemiologic risks such as personal health promotion and medical interventions, to include racism as a risk factor for inequitable birth outcomes. The paradigm examined the specific roles of historical and structural racism, and the racialized, contextualized, and temporal exposures that are unique to Black women’s experiences in the United States.The initiative radically changed the narratives about the underlying factors contributing to inequities in birth outcomes of Black women, altered the way we currently approach addressing inequities, and holds the keys for transforming practice to a more holistic and systematic approach to building sustained organizational structures in maternal and child health that accelerate the achievement of birth equity.Assessment: This paper is a historical account of an initiative, as recalled by the authors who were directly involved, that brought to the forefront the long-standing and unjust reproductive health inequities in the United States. It is composed of three distinct but interrelated parts that together map the past, present, and future of addressing racial inequities in Maternal and Child Health.This paper is composed of three distinct but interrelated parts that together map the past, present, and future of addressing racial inequities in Maternal and Child Health. Part I recounts the history and achievements of a Centers for Disease for Control and Prevention initiative in the 1980–90’s, led by the Prematurity Research Group in the Division of Reproductive Health, Pregnancy and Infant Health Branch. This initiative stimulated a paradigm shift in how we understand and address black infant mortality and the inequities in this outcome. Part II illustrates examples of some exemplary programmatic and policy legacies that stemmed either directly or indirectly from the Centers for Disease for Control and Prevention paradigm shift. Part III provides a discussion of how effectively the current practice in Maternal and Child Health applies this paradigm to address inequities and proposes a path for accelerating Title V agencies’ progress toward birth equity.This CDC initiative was transformative in that it raised the visibility of African American researchers, moved the field from a focus on traditional epidemiologic risks such as personal health promotion and medical interventions, to include racism as a risk factor for inequitable birth outcomes. The paradigm examined the specific roles of historical and structural racism, and the racialized, contextualized, and temporal exposures that are unique to Black women’s experiences in the United States.The initiative radically changed the narratives about the underlying factors contributing to inequities in birth outcomes of Black women, altered the way we currently approach addressing inequities, and holds the keys for transforming practice to a more holistic and systematic approach to building sustained organizational structures in maternal and child health that accelerate the achievement of birth equity.Conclusion: This paper is a historical account of an initiative, as recalled by the authors who were directly involved, that brought to the forefront the long-standing and unjust reproductive health inequities in the United States. It is composed of three distinct but interrelated parts that together map the past, present, and future of addressing racial inequities in Maternal and Child Health.This paper is composed of three distinct but interrelated parts that together map the past, present, and future of addressing racial inequities in Maternal and Child Health. Part I recounts the history and achievements of a Centers for Disease for Control and Prevention initiative in the 1980–90’s, led by the Prematurity Research Group in the Division of Reproductive Health, Pregnancy and Infant Health Branch. This initiative stimulated a paradigm shift in how we understand and address black infant mortality and the inequities in this outcome. Part II illustrates examples of some exemplary programmatic and policy legacies that stemmed either directly or indirectly from the Centers for Disease for Control and Prevention paradigm shift. Part III provides a discussion of how effectively the current practice in Maternal and Child Health applies this paradigm to address inequities and proposes a path for accelerating Title V agencies’ progress toward birth equity.This CDC initiative was transformative in that it raised the visibility of African American researchers, moved the field from a focus on traditional epidemiologic risks such as personal health promotion and medical interventions, to include racism as a risk factor for inequitable birth outcomes. The paradigm examined the specific roles of historical and structural racism, and the racialized, contextualized, and temporal exposures that are unique to Black women’s experiences in the United States.The initiative radically changed the narratives about the underlying factors contributing to inequities in birth outcomes of Black women, altered the way we currently approach addressing inequities, and holds the keys for transforming practice to a more holistic and systematic approach to building sustained organizational structures in maternal and child health that accelerate the achievement of birth equity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Quality care for infant mortality disparity elimination requires services that improve health status at both the individual and the population level. We examine disparity reduction due to effective care and ask the following question: Has clinical care ameliorated factors that make some populations more likely to have higher rates of infant mortality compared with other populations? Disparities in postneonatal mortality due to birth defects have emerged for non-Hispanic black and Hispanic infants. Surfactant and antenatal steroid therapy have been accompanied by growing disparities in respiratory distress syndrome mortality for black infants. Progesterone therapy has not reduced early preterm birth, the major contributor to mortality disparities among non-Hispanic black and Puerto Rican infants. The Back to Sleep campaign has minimally reduced SIDS disparities among American Indian//Alaska Native infants, but it has not reduced disparities among non-Hispanic black infants. In general, clinical care is not equitable and contributes to increasing disparities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article examines why culturally competent care and education are essential to the medical profession in the U.S. With this, the authors offer some hypotheses of the root causes of health care disparities, concluding with total joint replacement as an accepted example of education in culturally competent care. Moreover, there is considerable evidence that there are disparities in the health care status of racial and ethnic minorities in the country and in the medical care provided.

Discusses the severity of conditions originating in the perinatal period by estimating the proportion of deaths that occur among infants in the United States from 1986-1987 using weighted estimates to calculate morbidity and case fatality rates (CFR) for perinatal conditions. Newborn morbidity and infant mortality due to causes originating in the perinatal period; CFR associated with conditions originating in the perinatal period by race.

Abstract. From July through September 1984, acute convulsions caused by endrin poisoning occurred in the subdistrict of Talagang, Attock District, Punjab province, Pakistan. Eighteen of the 21 affected villages were surveyed; 70% of the cases for which ages were known (106 of 152) were in children I to 9 years of age; 9.8% of all affected persons (19 of 194) died. The outbreak occurred in villages on the main roads of the subdistrict and peaked in early September. Endrin was detected in the blood of 12 of 18 patients with a history of convulsions but was not found in the blood of four hospitalized control patients. One composite sugar sample taken from the homes of three persons had an endrin level of 0.04 ppm. Because of the high toxicity, repeated association with large-scale outbreaks of neurologic illness, and the difficulties of monitoring distribution, endrin should not be used for agricultural purposes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose.: To understand how social and structural contexts shape individual risk, vulnerability, and interconception health-related behaviors of African-American women. Approach or Design.: A longitudinal ethnographic study was conducted. Setting.: The study was conducted in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Participants.: The sample included 19 African-American women who were participants in the intervention group of a randomized clinical trial of interconceptional care. Method.: Data were collected through interaction with participants over a period of 6 to 12 months. Participant observation, structured and unstructured interviews, and Photovoice were used to obtain data; grounded theory was used for analysis. The analysis was guided by intersectional theory. Results.: Social disadvantage influenced health and health care–seeking behaviors of African-American women, and the disadvantage centered on the experience of racism. The authors identify seven experiences grounded in the interactions among the forces of racism, class, gender, and history that may influence women's participation in and the effectiveness of preconception and interconception health care. Conclusion.: African-American women's health and wellness behaviors are influenced by an experience of racism structurally embedded and made more virulent by its intersection with class, gender, and history. These intersecting forces create what may be a unique exposure that contributes significantly to the proximal determinants of health inequities for African-American women. Health promotion approaches that focus on the individual as the locus of intervention must concomitantly unravel and address the intertwining structural forces that shape individual circumstance in order to improve women's interconceptional health and to reduce disparities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]