Search

Ligamentous Lisfranc injuries cause debilitating pain and loss of function. Even small diastasis of this normally rigid joint after injury requires surgical treatment, but outcomes remain poor. Existing literature has compared the different surgical procedures using cadaveric models, but no approach has been recommended over others. This study uses a computational biomechanical approach consistent with a cadaveric study to evaluate the different procedures' ability to stabilize the Lisfranc joint without inducing secondary consequences. A validated rigid body model for the cadaver foot with a Lisfranc injury was extended to compare the stability of four different surgical repairs-three open reduction and internal fixation procedures with different hardware (cannulated screws, endobuttons, and screws with a dorsal plate) and primary arthrodesis with screws. Forces calculated from the rigid body model for 50% partial weight bearing provided boundary conditions for a finite element model of the surgical repairs. Comparing the different surgical procedures, the open reduction and internal fixation with screws and primary arthrodesis with screws showed the most stable postoperative Lisfranc joint. However, the use of cannulated screws for fixation showed regions of high stress that may be susceptible to breakage and also resulted in higher contact forces in joints adjacent to the surgery site. Endobuttons and dorsal plates did not restore sufficient stability. Since all procedures showed different points of concern that could impact outcomes, additional surgical approaches could be needed in the future. This study offers a standard protocol for benchmarking the new procedures against those currently used. Published version

Following IRB approval, a cohort of 3-D rigid-body computational models was created from submillimeter MRIs of clinically diagnosed Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity patients and employed to investigate postoperative foot/ankle function and surgical effect during single-leg stance. Models were constrained through physiologic joint contact, passive soft-tissue tension, active muscle force, full body weight, and without idealized joints. Models were validated against patient-matched controls using clinically utilized radiographic angle and distance measures and plantar force distributions in the medial forefoot, lateral forefoot, and hindfoot. Each model further predicted changes in strain for the spring ligament, deltoid ligament, and plantar fascia, as well as joint contact loads for three midfoot joints, the talonavicular, navicular-1st cuneiform, and calcaneocuboid. Radiographic agreement ranged across measures, with average absolute deviations of

Adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is a degenerative disease resulting in malalignment of the mid- and hindfoot secondary to posterior tibial tendon dysfunction and increasing implication of ligament pathologies. Despite the complex 3D nature of AAFD, 2D radiographs are still employed to diagnose and stage the disease. Computer modeling techniques allow for accurate 3D recreations of musculoskeletal systems for the investigation of biomechanical factors contributing to disease. Following Institutional Review Board approval, the lower limbs of six diagnosed AAFD sufferers were imaged with MRI, photographs, and X-ray. Next, a radiologist graded the MRI attenuation of eight soft-tissues implicated in AAFD. Six patient-specific rigid-body models were then created and loaded according to patient weight, graded soft-tissues, and extrinsic muscles. Model function was validated using clinically relevant kinematic measures in three planes. Agreement varied depending on the measure, with average absolute deviations of

Background: Flexor hallucis longus (FHL) and flexor digitorum longus (FDL) tendon transfers are frequently used to restore the function of a deficient tibialis posterior tendon in stage II adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD). Either transfer causes some loss in toe flexion force, although the decision to tenodese the cut tendon to restore associated function remains controversial. This study quantified changes in plantar force before and after tendon transfer and with or without distal tenodesis in a cadaveric model. Methods: The plantar force distribution of 10 matched pairs of statically loaded cadaveric lower extremities was investigated. Each foot was tested when it was intact, after FDL/FHL tendon transfer, and after tendon transfer + tenodesis. Results: Transfer of either FHL or FDL showed a statistically significant decrease in flexion force of the great toe ( P < .01) and lesser toes ( P < .001), respectively. Subsequent tenodesis in either tendon demonstrated an ability to restore flexion force in the great ( P < .05) and lesser ( P < .01) toes, respectively, with the FHL transfer + tenodesis restoring great toe loading to near pretransfer levels. Following either transfer, plantar force increased in the medial forefoot; this was sustained with FDL transfer + tenodesis but reduced under FHL transfer + tenodesis. Lateral forefoot force increased modestly (8%) with FHL transfer ( P < .05) but returned to near intact levels with tenodesis. FDL transfer + tenodesis resulted in increased medial midfoot and heel loading. Discussion: FHL or FDL transfer notably reduces associated toe flexion force. This loss can be restored to near normal levels with tenodesis for FHL transfer. As increased lateral forefoot loading is commonly associated with AAFD corrective procedures, FHL tenodesis may mitigate the unintended increases caused by the tendon transfer. The medial midfoot and heel loading with FDL transfer + tenodesis underscores that tendon transfers alone do not reestablish the passive architecture of the foot but augment deficient subtalar inversion force. Clinical Relevance: This cadaveric study shows that the FHL is more biomechanically suitable for tibialis posterior tendon insufficiency than the FDL, which may be a basis for a study to investigate whether it is superior in a clinical situation.

Background: Displaced medial malleolus fractures require surgical repair because of the critical role the structure plays in normal joint function. Various approaches exist, but options are limited for small fragment fractures. This study compared repair with the Medial Malleolar Sled fixation system (Trimed, Inc, Valencia, CA) to lag screws in 2 modes of biomechanical loading in a cadaveric model. Methods: A Müller type B medial malleolus fracture was simulated on matched pairs of cadaveric lower extremities and repaired with the sled or 2 cancellous lag screws. Tibial distraction (tension, n = 10) or internal rotation (torsion, n = 11) was applied. Fragment movement was measured in the sagittal (tension and torsion) and transverse (torsion-only) planes. Fragment movement at 1 mm and 2 mm (clinical malunion) of gapping during tension and at 2, 4, 6, and 8 N-m during torsion was analyzed via paired t tests. Results: In tension, the load at the 2-mm gap was statistically lower for screws ( P = .026). Opening angle was statistically larger for the sled at the 1-mm ( P = .0004) and 2-mm ( P = .008) gap. In torsion, gapping was statistically lower for the sled (ranging from P = .0013 at 4 N-m to P = .0187 at 8 N-m). No differences were detected for opening angle or transverse plane movement. Conclusion: The sled appeared stronger in tension and as effective as lag screws in torsion. The sled may be a viable option for fractures too small for 4.0- or 3.5-mm lag screws. Clinical Relevance: The sled may be suitable in applications where a tension band would normally be considered and may provide stronger fixation in osteoporotic bone compared with lag screw fixation.

Background: This study evaluated the effects of locking vs nonlocking configuration on the biomechanical performance of a calcaneal reconstruction plate in an osteoporotic cadaveric model. Materials and Methods: A Saunders II B type calcaneal fracture was created in ten matched pair of cadaveric calcanei. Each pair was fixed with the Ascension calcaneal reconstruction plate using either locking or nonlocking screws in the same hole pattern. Specimens were axially loaded for 1000 cycles through the talus followed by load to failure. Statistical comparisons were made between the locking and nonlocking constructs on the displacements during cyclic loading as well as construct stiffness and load achieved at selected fragment displacements. Results: No significant difference was detected between the locking and nonlocking constructs in displacement during cyclic loading ( p >0.2) for the numbers available. Similarly no significant difference was found in stiffness of the constructs between the groups: 445.7 ± 148.8 (N/mm ± SD) for the locking plate and 395.2 ± 127.7 for the nonlocking plate ( p >0.14). The load achieved at 2 mm displacement of the posterior fragment for the two groups were not different: locking plate at 744.6 ± 237.2 N and nonlocking plate at 739.3± 269.7 N ( p >0.99). Conclusion: This study did not reveal a mechanical advantage to locking technology for calcaneal fractures with the selected plate and fracture model. Clinical Relevance: While locking plate technology has shown mechanical advantages for fracture management in other osteoporotic models, in our fracture model and plating construct, this was not found. It is still unclear which fixation technique is most beneficial in these calcaneal fractures.

Talonavicular fusion is performed for a variety of indications. This study examined the effects of fixation techniques on plantar pressures, construct stiffness, and strength.Eight matched pairs of cadaveric lower extremities were axially loaded intact and after talonavicular fixation with a 3.5 reconstruction plate, reconstruction plate plus cancellous screw (plate/screw), or three screws (screws). Recorded plantar pressures were divided into three forefoot, two midfoot, and two hindfoot regions. Cantilevered bending of excised constructs provided stiffness data for plantar and lateral directions, and failure characteristics in plantar bending.Relative to the intact state, all fixations decreased peak pressure in the medial forefoot, while generally increasing it in the lateral forefoot and midfoot. Average pressure shifted laterally for all fixation methods in the forefoot, generally in the hindfoot and the lateral midfoot. Generally, contact areas decreased in the medial forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot while increasing laterally in the midfoot and hindfoot. The only difference among fixation methods was a decreased medial midfoot contact area for screws. No differences were found between screws and plate/screw in bending stiffness or failure (p0.5 and p0.2 respectively). Plantar and lateral bending stiffness for the plate/screw method averaged approximately 363 N/mm while stiffness of the screw only construct averaged approximately 380 N/mm. The load to failure averaged 946 N for the plate/screw construct and 1099 N for the screw construct.This study showed lateralization of plantar pressures following talonavicular fixation. Minimal differences were found between plate/screw and screws. Fixation across the joint may be key to achieving stability sufficient to resist shear and rotational stresses.Plate/screw or screws would likely be similarly effective in fusing the talonavicular joint. However, the fusion induced lateralization of plantar pressures may unintentionally result in adjacent joint arthritis and foot pain.

Adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is a degenerative disease resulting in malalignment of the mid- and hindfoot secondary to posterior tibial tendon dysfunction and increasing implication of ligament pathologies. Despite the complex 3D nature of AAFD, 2D radiographs are still employed to diagnose and stage the disease. Computer modeling techniques allow for accurate 3D recreations of musculoskeletal systems for the investigation of biomechanical factors contributing to disease. Following Institutional Review Board approval, the lower limbs of six diagnosed AAFD sufferers were imaged with MRI, photographs, and X-ray. Next, a radiologist graded the MRI attenuation of eight soft-tissues implicated in AAFD. Six patient-specific rigid-body models were then created and loaded according to patient weight, graded soft-tissues, and extrinsic muscles. Model function was validated using clinically relevant kinematic measures in three planes. Agreement varied depending on the measure, with average absolute deviations of7° for angles and4 mm for distances. Additionally, the clinically favored AP talonavicular coverage angle, ML talo-1st metatarsal angle, and ML 1st cuneiform height showed strong correlations of R(2) = 0.63, 0.75, and 0.85, respectively. Thus, computer modeling offers a promising methodology for the non-invasive investigation of in vivo kinematic behavior in pathologic feet and, once validated, may further be used to investigate biomechanical parameters that are difficult to measure clinically.

Background: Bony procedures play an essential role in the operative treatment of stage II posterior tibial tendon insufficiency and often substantially alter the loading characteristics of the foot. Methods: Eight matched pairs of cadaver lower extremities were axially loaded onto a TekScan HR Mat. (TekScan, Inc., South Boston, MA) After intact testing, each specimen had a lateral column lengthening (either a calcaneocuboid distraction arthrodesis [CCDA] or Evans procedure), a medializing calcaneal osteotomy (MCO), and a plantarflexion (Cotton) osteotomy of the medial cuneiform. The measured plantar pressures were divided into three forefoot regions, two midfoot regions, and two hindfoot regions. For each region, average pressure, peak pressure, and contact area data were collected. Results: Despite the fact that both lateral column lengthening procedures resulted in increased lateral forefoot pressures, no significant differences were noted between the CCDA and the Evans procedure. The addition of a MCO did not significantly alter the plantar pressures measured after the lateral column lengthening alone. Although the Cotton osteotomy resulted in increased average pressures within the medial forefoot, a compensatory significant decrease in lateral forefoot pressures was not observed. Conclusions: The present study demonstrated increased lateral forefoot pressures after a combined lateral column lengthening and MCO and does not support the idea that a Cotton osteotomy significantly reduces loading of the lateral forefoot. Clinical Relevance: The incidence of lateral forefoot pain and fifth metatarsal stress fractures subsequent to either lateral column lengthening procedure may not significantly decline after a Cotton osteotomy.

BackgroundAnkle spanning external fixation has become the initial treatment of choice for complex tibial pilon fractures. Many fixator designs exist, but their biomechanical performance has not been studied extensively for this application. The goal of the present study was to compare the torsional performance of two commercially available frames, the Orthofix XCaliber and the Howmedica Hoffmann®II.MethodsThe XCaliber and the Hoffmann®II were each applied to six fresh cadaver lower extremities and were loaded in a materials testing machine. Strain gauges were attached to the anteromedial cortex of the distal tibia, and each specimen underwent torsional and axial load testing, with and without the external fixator. A simulated pilon fracture was created, and torsional testing was repeated.ResultsResults indicated that the XCaliber was significantly more rigid in internal rotation than the Hoffmann®II, before (49%) and after (41%) creation of the pilon fracture. Despite the XCaliber's increased rigidity relative to the Hoffmann®II (22% to 31%) in external rotation, statistical significance was not attained. Both fixators reduced strain (25% to 85%) at the anteromedial cortex upon torsional testing, but no significant differences between the two frames were noted.ConclusionsThe present study demonstrates that the XCaliber has mechanical advantages over the Hoffmann®II in terms of torsional rigidity for a tibial pilon fracture.Clinical RelevanceIncreased rigidity of the XCaliber could potentially lead to decreased time to union, and a lower incidence of pin loosening and would prove beneficial in a setting in which the external fixator is used as the definitive fixation.

The foot and ankle is a complex structure made of many small bones with capsular and ligamentous con straints. The physiology, kinematics, and muscle inter action of the walking, jogging, and running cycles will be discussed and the current biomechanical literature reviewed. To analyze the pathologic state, one must be aware of the normal stresses and functions of the running cycle. This knowledge establishes a rational basis for the interpretation of problems in providing medical and orthotic treatment.