Search

Copyright of Journal of Public Law / Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht is the property of Verlag Oesterreich GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The aim of this research was to investigate the profile and characteristics of the scientific output published in the Max Planck Institute's journal Ius Commune between 1967 and 2001. Bibliometric techniques were used, with a predominantly quantitative approach. The research universe consisted of all the articles published in all the editions of this journal. The bibliometric indicators measured were a total of 28 editions, 285 articles, 163 authors, 26 female authors, 22 nationalities and nine languages. The author who published the most in the journal was Johannes-Michael Scholz, with 19 articles. The nationality with the highest number of authors in the journal is German. The results show an overview of the topics covered and the authors, nationalities and languages that have contributed to the journal Ius Commune. A discussion of the results of this research concludes the importance of the journal Ius Commune for the diffusion, dissemination and socialization of scientific production on legal topics and for the formation of a legal conceptual framework for European unification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: The question, what constitutes the methodology of the legal history research, is answered in different ways. One is that it is the same as for general history: writing on history according to a set of rules which constitute its methodology, because in the end all research on history is just creating a text. It follows from this that legal history is a variation of history and belongs to history faculties, since there is no connection with legal methodology. It is maintained in this article that this view is based on too simple a view of history as science: there is not one methodology but various methodologies ('discourses', not only in history but in science in general), each with its own conditions and requirements. Legal history's discourse has a particular distinguishing element, viz. legal analysis and methodology, which sets it apart from history in general. Its natural place is consequently in law faculties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Debreceni Jogi Műhely is the property of University of Debrecen and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Public Law / Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht is the property of Verlag Oesterreich GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Historia Constitucional is the property of Revista Historia Constitucional and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Public Law / Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht is the property of Verlag Oesterreich GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Public Law / Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht is the property of Verlag Oesterreich GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revue de Synthèse is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revue de Synthèse is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Welche Bedeutung haben die Rechts- und Geschichtswissenschaft füreinander? Diese Frage stellte sich Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde, der Staatsrechtler und Historiker, in seinem juristischen, verfassungshistorischen und rechtsphilosophischen Werk. Böckenförde zielte darauf, zwei Disziplinen, die in der institutionellen Auffächerung seit dem 19. Jahrhundert auseinandergestrebt waren, in einem gemeinsamen Interesse an der Erklärung von Zusammenhängen in der „Geschichte politisch-sozialer Entwicklungen" zusammenzuführen. Er fügte dabei methodische Perspektiven und theoretische Ansätze zusammen, die viele Historiker trennten: die politische Geschichte und die Sozialgeschichte, die Geschichte des Rechts und die der Gesellschaft. Für ihn waren dies durch ein übergreifendes Erkenntnisinteresse an „Strukturen" und „Ordnungsproblemen" miteinander zu verbindende Gegenstandsbereiche. In Anlehnung an Otto Brunner stellte Böckenförde Juristen und Historikern die gemeinsame Aufgabe, die „politisch-soziale Bauform einer Zeit" zu begreifen. Diesen Anspruch löste er durch einen seiner Zeit vorausweisenden hermeneutisch-wissenschaftsgeschichtlichen Zugang zum Staatsrecht wie zur Verfassungsgeschichte ein sowie in grundlegenden Beiträgen zu den „Geschichtlichen Grundbegriffen" und zur Geschichte der Rechts- und Staatsphilosophie. Ein wissenschaftliches Vermächtnis des im Februar 2019 verstorbenen Gelehrten liegt in der tiefen Einsicht in die Geschichtlichkeit und damit Zeitgebundenheit aller staatlich-rechtlichen Ordnung: Deshalb müssen Juristen die vermeintliche Überzeitlichkeit ihrer normativen Arbeitsgrundlagen in Frage stellen und Historiker das Recht als zentralen Gegenstand ihrer Wissenschaft begreifen. Ansonsten verstehen sie weder ihre Geschichte noch ihre Gegenwart. What do jurisprudence and historiography mean for one another? This was the question Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde, expert in public and constitutional law and historian, addressed in his writings on jurisprudence, constitutional history, and legal philosophy. Böckenförde endeavoured to bring together two disciplines – estranged since the nineteenth century by institutional diversification – in the common aim of explaining the big picture in the „history of politico-social developments". He coupled methodological perspectives with theoretical approaches that set many historians at variance: political history and social history, the history of law and that of society. For him, these areas of study shared an overarching cognitive interest in „structures" and „problems of order". Following Otto Brunner, Böckenförde set jurists and historians the common task of exploring the „politico-social design of an epoch". In tackling this challenge, he adopted a hermeneutic, intellectual-history approach to public law and constitutional history, making an innovational contribution to „basic historical concepts" and to the history of the philosophy of law and the state. The scholarly heritage of Böckenförde, who died in February 2019, lies in the profound insight he provided into the historicity and thus temporality, time-boundedness of all state legal order – obliging jurists to question any assumption that the normative basis for their work is timeless, and requiring historians to realize that law is a focal concern of their discipline. They will otherwise fail to comprehend both the past and the present of their field of study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Z Dziejów Prawa is the property of Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Slaskiego and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Z Dziejów Prawa is the property of Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Slaskiego and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Der vorliegende Artikel beschäftigt sich mit dem Phänomen ausländischer ProtestantInnen im frühneuzeitlichen Spanisch-Amerika. Der Fokus liegt dabei auf der Inquisition, welche den Kontakt zwischen Häretikern und der katholischen Bevölkerung in der Neuen Welt unterbinden musste. Die Strategien der Inquisition waren sowohl auf Exklusion, als auch auf Dissimulation und Inklusion ausgerichtet, wodurch die Entstehung einer protestantischen (Parallel-)Gesellschaft verhindert werden konnte.

Copyright of Z Dziejów Prawa is the property of Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Slaskiego and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Cracow Studies of Constitutional & Legal History / Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa is the property of Jagiellonian University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Taking the viewpoint of the civil law tradition, which has traditionally assumed that the legitimacy of the administration is state-derived, this text recognises the constant decline of state sovereignty in modern times and consequently the increasing diffusion of the state into society. At the level of state theory, this reflects a shift from the great philosophical ‘social contract’ to many small legal contracts as its functional equivalent. Dealing with this phenomenon, administrative law needs to address the fundamental question of how law can sustainably support the unity of a society where the state administration and the various parts of society it has to govern are strange to each other and at the same time depending on mutual ad-hoc cooperation time and again.- Aus einer kontinentalen Sicht, gestützt auf die langen Erfahrungen mit einer staatlich angeleiteten Legitimation der Staatsverwaltung, erkennt diese Untersuchung den beständigen Niedergang staatlicher Souveränität in der Moderne und folglich die zunehmende Diffusion des Staates in die Gesellschaft. Auf der Ebene der Staatstheorie wird dies durch einen Wechsel vom großen philosophischen Sozialvertrag zu vielen einzelnen rechtlichen Verträgen als dessen funktionales Äquivalent gespiegelt. Mit diesem Phänomen erhält das Verwaltungsrecht eine grundsätzlich neue Perspektive: Es stellt sich die Frage, wie mit Recht die Einheit einer Gesellschaft hervorgebracht werden kann, in welcher die Staatsverwaltung und die von ihr zu regulierenden Sozialbereiche sich einerseits fremd geworden sind und doch andererseits auf wechselseitige Ad-hoc-Kooperationen immer wieder von Neuem angewiesen sind.

Copyright of Journal of Public Law / Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht is the property of Verlag Oesterreich GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Kriminologisches Journal is the property of Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article discusses the contribution of Spanish legal historian Alfonso García-Gallo to the methodology of the history of law, with a focus on the concept of institutional method. A historical overview of the establishment of legal history as an autonomous discipline in the studies of law in Spain is given, with particular attention to the real decree of September 2, 1883. Subjects mentioned include the role played by Spanish lawyer Eduardo de Hinojosa y Naveros in the development of the discipline in Spain, the work of law professor Galo Sánchez, and the book "Historia, Derecho e Historia del Derecho" by García-Gallo.

Copyright of Collected Papers of Zagreb Law Faculty / Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu is the property of Sveuciliste u Zagrebu, Pravni Fakultet and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Historia Constitucional is the property of Revista Historia Constitucional and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article discusses the methodology of studying ancient economic history since its inception as an academic discipline at the end of the 19th century. The study of economics is also examined in regard to its contribution to the study of other aspects of ancient Roman society, particularly the relationship between ancient Roman law and the economy. In concluding, the author asserts the academic value of interdisciplinary studies that focus on and compare ancient Roman law, economics, and society.