Search

Purpose: This study evaluated ElastQ, a two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) technique, for the non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis risk using liver stiffness measurement (LSM). The aim was to determine its diagnostic accuracy and establish LSM cutoffs for clinical risk stratification. Methods: A prospective multicenter study was conducted, employing vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) as a reference standard. The statistical analysis utilized Pearson correlations and Lin concordance correlation coefficients, diagnostic areas under the curve (AUCs), and 90%-specific rule-in and 90%-sensitive rule-out ElastQ cutoffs. Results: The study included 875 patients at risk for liver disease, of whom 816 (376 women, 46.1%; median age, 57.0 years [interquartile range, 19.0]) had successful and reliable VCTE- and ElastQ-LSMs. The median LSM was 13.0 kPa (range, 2.0 to 75.0 kPa) for VCTE and 6.6 kPa (range, 2.9 to 26.5 kPa) for ElastQ. The correlation between VCTE-LSM and ElastQ-LSM was adequate for VCTE-LSM <15 kPa (Pearson r=0.63) but lower for VCTE-LSM ≥15.0 kPa (Pearson r=0.27). VCTE-LSM indicated no fibrosis risk (<5.0 kPa) in 178 cases (21.8%), gray zone (5.0-9.9 kPa) in 347 cases (42.5%), and advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD; ≥10.0 kPa) in 291 cases (35.7%). The diagnostic AUC for ElastQ-LSM was 0.82 for fibrosis risk and 0.90 for ACLD. The clinically relevant ElastQ cutoffs for ruling out fibrosis risk and ruling in compensated ACLD (cACLD) were <5.0 kPa and ≥9.0 kPa, respectively. Conclusion: ElastQ 2D-SWE enables accurate, non-invasive assessments of liver fibrosis and cACLD risk. In clinical practice, ElastQ-LSM <5.0 kPa rules out fibrosis, while ElastQ-LSM ≥9.0 kPa rules in cACLD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The primary aim was to estimate the influence of various depths on ultrasound attenuation coefficient (AC) of multiple vendors in the liver. The secondary aim was to evaluate the impact of region of interest (ROI) size on AC measurements in a subset of participants. Methods: This Institutional Review Board (IRB)‐approved Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)‐compliant retrospective study was carried out in two centers using AC‐Canon and AC‐Philips algorithms and extracting AC‐Siemens values from ultrasound‐derived fat fraction algorithm. Measurements were performed positioning ROI upper edge (3 cm size) at 2, 3, 4, 5 cm from the liver capsule with AC‐Canon and AC‐Philips and at 1.5, 2, 3 cm with Siemens algorithm. In a subset of participants, measurements were obtained with 1 and 3 cm ROI size. Univariate and multivariate linear regression models and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were used for statistical analysis as appropriate. Results: Three different cohorts were studied. Sixty‐three participants (34 females; mean age: 51 ± 14 years) were studied with AC‐Canon, 60 (46 females; mean age: 57 ± 11 years) with AC‐Philips, and 50 (25 females; 61 ± 13 years) with AC‐Siemens. There was a decrease in AC values per 1 cm increase in depth in all. In multivariable analysis, the coefficient was −0.049 (−0.060; −0.038 P <.001) with AC‐Canon, −0.058 (−0.066; −0.049 P <.001) with AC‐Philips and −0.081 (−0.112; −0.050 P <.001) with AC‐Siemens. AC values with 1 cm ROI were significantly higher than those obtained with 3 cm ROI at all depths (P <.001) but the agreement between AC values obtained with different ROI size was excellent (CCC 0.82 [0.77–0.88]). Conclusions: There is depth dependence in AC measurement that affects results. A standardized protocol with fixed ROI's depth and size is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study's primary aim was to assess factors affecting ultrasound attenuation coefficient (AC) measurement repeatability using the Canon ultrasound (US) system. The secondary aim was to evaluate whether similar results were obtained with other vendors' AC algorithms. Methods: This prospective study was performed at two centers from February to November 2022. AC was obtained using two US systems (Aplio i800 of Canon Medical Systems and Arietta 850 of Fujifilm). An algorithm combining AC and the backscatter coefficient was also used (Sequoia US System, Siemens Healthineers). To evaluate inter-observer concordance, AC was obtained by two expert operators using different transducer positions with regions of interest (ROIs) varying in terms of depth and size. Intra-observer concordance was evaluated on measurements performed intercostally, subcostally, and in the left liver lobe. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was used. Results: Thirty-four participants (mean age, 49.4±15.1 years; 18 females) were studied. AC values progressively decreased with depth. The measurements in intercostal spaces on bestquality US images using a 3-cm ROI with its upper edge 2 cm below the liver capsule during breath-hold showed the highest intra-observer and inter-observer concordance (0.92 [95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 0.95] and 0.89 [0.82 to 0.96], respectively). Measurements in the left lobe showed the lowest intra-observer and inter-observer concordance (0.67 [0.43 to 0.90] and 0.58 [0.12 to 1.00], respectively). Intercostal space measurements also had the highest repeatability for the other two ultrasound systems. Conclusion: AC values obtained in intercostal spaces on best-quality images using a 3-cm ROI placed with its top 2 cm below the liver capsule were highly repeatable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The primary aim of our study was to assess the correlation between an improved version of the attenuation coefficient available on the Arietta 850 ultrasound system (iATT, Fujifilm Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). The secondary aim was to assess whether focusing only on iATT acquisition without following the strict protocol for liver stiffness measurements would affect iATT measurement. Methods: Consecutive individuals were enrolled. Pearson's r was used to test the correlation between ATT and CAP values. The concordance between iATT and CAP was tested using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Results: 354 individuals (203 males, 151 females) were studied. The overall Pearson correlation between CAP and iATT values obtained following or not following the liver stiffness measurement protocol, respectively, were r = 0.73 and r = 0.71. The correlation was affected by the interquartile range/median (IQR/M) of the 10 measurements: it was r = 0.75 for IQR/M ≤ 15% and r = 0.60 for IQR/M > 15%. CCC showed that there was a moderate to good concordance between iATT and CAP values. Conclusion: iATT shows a strong correlation with CAP that does not decrease when the protocol for liver stiffness acquisition is not followed. The correlation between iATT and CAP values is higher when the IQR/M ≤ 15%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]