Search

Fernando Perez-Ruiz,1 Giovambattista Desideri2 1Rheumatology Division, Cruces University Hospital, Baracaldo, Spain; 2Geriatric Unit, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy Abstract: Gout is the most common form of inflammatory arthritis and is a considerable burden to patients and health care systems worldwide. Despite its clinical, economic, and social impact, patient persistence and adherence to prescribed urate-lowering therapies (ULT), ranging from 20% to 70%, is considered to be among the poorest of all chronic conditions. The majority of gout patients consequently receive suboptimal benefits of their prescribed pharmacotherapies. As gout is associated with several comorbidities along with an increased risk of premature mortality, achieving improved outcomes through adherence to ULT is crucial. Adherence to medication is complex and multidimensional and includes a combination of treatment-, patient-, and physician-related factors. This review explores the factors related to ULT adherence with the overall aim of helping health care providers better understand the barriers to adherence. Several interventions targeting pharmacists, nurses, and patients are being investigated to improve adherence. Furthermore, enhanced awareness and understanding of the need to treat-to-target in order to improve patient outcomes is needed among health care professionals. Greater understanding of the multidimensional nature of non-adherence can help physicians to treat gout more effectively and empower patients to improve self-management of this long-term disease. Keywords: treatment, gout suppressants, persistence, monitoring

A gout attack may evolve after a purine-rich diet or alcohol and after starting urate-lowering therapy (ULT). The relationships between fluctuation and change in serum urate (SU) with the occurrence of flares were investigated in this study. In the prospective NOR-Gout study, gout patients with increased SU and a recent flare were treated to target with ULT over 1 year, with follow-up at year 2 with SU and flare as outcomes. SU and flares were assessed at both monthly and 3-monthly intervals until target SU was reached. Fluctuation over periods and changes in SU between two time points were assessed and compared in patients with and without flares. At year 1, 186 patients completed follow-up (88.2%) and 173 (82.0%) at year 2. Mean age (SD) at baseline was 56.4 (13.7) years, disease duration was 7.8 (7.6) years, and 95.3% were men. The first-year SU fluctuation and change were related to flare occurrence during year 1 (both p < 0.05). High fluctuation with an absolute sum of all SU changes during the first 9 months was related to flares over 3-month periods (all p < 0.05), and high fluctuation during the first 3 months was related to flares in months 3–6 (p = 0.04). Monthly and high SU changes or again reaching higher SU levels > 360 µmol/l were not related to flares. Fluctuation and change in SU were related to flare occurrence during the first year of ULT, while changes between visits and reaching SU levels > 360 µmol/L were not related to flares. Key Points • Urate-lowering therapy seeks to achieve a treatment target and prevent gout flares, and changes in serum urate are related to gout flares. • Fluctuation and changes in serum urate were associated with gout flares, suggesting that fluctuation in serum urate is unfavourable during gout treatment. • During urate-lowering therapy in gout in clinical practice, fluctuation of serum urate, for example, due to lack of adherence, should be observed and avoided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: Hyperuricemia leading to urate crystal formation in tissues represents the pathophysiological mechanism of gout. Guidelines recommend a therapeutic target of serum urate concentration (sUA) <6 mg/dL, or even lower (=5 mg/dL) in patients with large deposits. We conducted an analysis with the aim to achieve additional insights into the urate-lowering efficacy of two xanthine oxidase inhibitors, allopurinol and febuxostat. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a pooled analysis of phase III trials on allopurinol and febuxostat, including 4101 patients with gout and hyperuricemia. The efficacy outcomes were: mean reduction of sUA concentration from baseline; number of patients with target sUA levels (<6.0 mg/dL or =5 mgdL); time to reach target sUA levels. RESULTS: Three registrative, phase III, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled/allopurinol-controlled trials assessing the efficacy of febuxostat, were included. The mean reduction of sUA concentration with any dose of febuxostat was higher (-2.92±2.87 mg/dL; -27%), with respect to placebo- (-0.62±1.84 mg/dL; -5%) and allopurinol-pooled groups (-2.41±2.20 mg/dL; -24%). Moreover, febuxostat showed a higher probability to achieve the recommended target sUA concentration than allopurinol [odds ratio: 2.43 (95% CI: 2.119-2.789) and 4.05 (95% CI: 3.41-4.82) for sUA levels <6 mg/dL and =5 mg/dL, respectively]. Patients on any-dose febuxostat reached target sUA faster than allopurinol-treated patients (86.04±71.47 vs. 98.76±70.88 days and 52.08±49.97 vs. 90.42±68.03 days for reaching sUA levels <6 mg/dL and =5 mg/dL, respectively; p <0.001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with gout and hyperuricemia, febuxostat was significantly more effective and faster than allopurinol in obtaining the recommended target sUA levels, which were reached by a higher number of patients. Therefore, febuxostat was confirmed as an effective option for the treatment of hyperuricemia in gout. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: New drugs and new evidence concerning the use of established treatments have become available since the publication of the first European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of gout, in 2006. This situation has prompted a systematic review and update of the 2006 recommendations.Methods: The EULAR task force consisted of 15 rheumatologists, 1 radiologist, 2 general practitioners, 1 research fellow, 2 patients and 3 experts in epidemiology/methodology from 12 European countries. A systematic review of the literature concerning all aspects of gout treatments was performed. Subsequently, recommendations were formulated by use of a Delphi consensus approach.Results: Three overarching principles and 11 key recommendations were generated. For the treatment of flare, colchicine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), oral or intra-articular steroids or a combination are recommended. In patients with frequent flare and contraindications to colchicine, NSAIDs and corticosteroids, an interleukin-1 blocker should be considered. In addition to education and a non-pharmacological management approach, urate-lowering therapy (ULT) should be considered from the first presentation of the disease, and serum uric acid (SUA) levels should be maintained at<6 mg/dL (360 µmol/L) and <5 mg/dL (300 µmol/L) in those with severe gout. Allopurinol is recommended as first-line ULT and its dosage should be adjusted according to renal function. If the SUA target cannot be achieved with allopurinol, then febuxostat, a uricosuric or combining a xanthine oxidase inhibitor with a uricosuric should be considered. For patients with refractory gout, pegloticase is recommended.Conclusions: These recommendations aim to inform physicians and patients about the non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments for gout and to provide the best strategies to achieve the predefined urate target to cure the disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The treat-to-target (T2T) concept has been applied successfully in several inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Gout is a chronic disease with a high burden of pain and inflammation. Because the pathogenesis of gout is strongly related to serum urate levels, gout may be an ideal disease in which to apply a T2T approach. Our aim was to develop international T2T recommendations for patients with gout.Methods: A committee of experts with experience in gout agreed upon potential targets and outcomes, which was the basis for the systematic literature search. Eleven rheumatologists, one cardiologist, one nephrologist, one general practitioner and one patient met in October 2015 to develop T2T recommendations based on the available scientific evidence. Levels of evidence, strength of recommendations and levels of agreement were derived.Results: Although no randomised trial was identified in which a comparison with standard treatment or an evaluation of a T2T approach had been performed in patients with gout, indirect evidence was provided to focus on targets such as normalisation of serum urate levels. The expert group developed four overarching principles and nine T2T recommendations. They considered dissolution of crystals and prevention of flares to be fundamental; patient education, ensuring adherence to medications and monitoring of serum urate levels were also considered to be of major importance.Conclusions: This is the first application of the T2T approach developed for gout. Since no publication reports a trial comparing treatment strategies for gout, highly credible overarching principles and level D expert recommendations were created and agreed upon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: In patients with gout, serum uric acid (sUA) concentrations should be lowered at least below the target of 6 mg/dL (even below 5 mg/dL in patients with severe gout). To achieve this goal, urate lowering medications (ULMs) should be considered. Currently- used ULMs include xanthine-oxidase inhibitors such as allopurinol, febuxostat, as well as available uricosuric agents. However, evidence comparing these agents remains scant. We have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to retrieve evidence on the clinical trials on the above-mentioned drugs in the treatment of gout. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The following efficacy outcomes were considered in the metaanalysis: (1)% of patients meeting the therapeutic target for sUA level (<6 mg/dl) and (2) percentage reduction in sUA concentration at the end of the study compared with baseline values. An explorative analysis on safety was also conducted. RESULTS: In total, 16 papers concerned febuxostat, 15 allopurinol, 4 benzbromarone and none involved probenecid. Overall, 70.7% of patients reached the target of sUA with febuxostat therapy; the reduction in sUA was 45.3%. Corresponding figures with allopurinol were 44.4% and 33.8%, respectively. The number of patients on benzbromarone (N=129) was too low to retrieve definitive findings. The advantage for febuxostat over allopurinol was evident also in patients with renal dysfunction. Safety analysis favored febuxostat over allopurinol (OR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.75-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the reported data, febuxostat can play a major role in the treatment of hyperuricaemia and gout. Febuxostat is a suitable pharmacological option for first line treatment of gout, given its established efficacy and safety, documented in a high number of clinical studies and in daily practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hyperuricemia and gout are independent risk factors associated with the development of hypertension, metabolic syndrome, vascular damage, and renal disease. Whether these risk factors are causally related to these important chronic co-morbidities remains uncertain, but inflammation may provide a mechanistic explanation. Hyperuricemia and gout negatively affect vascular function by exerting pro-oxidant effects and by decreasing nitric oxide bioavailability, thus inducing inflammation and endothelial dysfunction, which may promote hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular (CV) disease. This paper presents and discusses current understanding of the diverse influences promoting hyperuricemia and gout and the basis of acute and chronic hyperuricemia/gout-related inflammation. This review is based on a PubMed/Embase database search for articles on hyperuricemia and its impact on cardiovascular and renal function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A letter to the editor is presented on the prospective therapeutic considerations of hyperuricemia and tissue monourate deposits.

The article focuses on the various treatments employed in the management of both acute and chronic gout. A study conducted by N. Bellamy and colleagues reveals that acute gout can be treated either by nonpharmacological treatment, or by pharmacological treatment, such as intravenous colchicine and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). On the other hand, the study recommends that a urate-lowering therapy (ULT) is proven to be effective in treating chronic gout.

Most of the drugs prescribed to treat acute gouty attacks were used before the introduction of modern clinical trials. Thus, there are few well-designed studies available to evaluate these drugs. Nevertheless, worldwide clinical experience supports the use of most nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), colchicine and corticosteroids in the treatment of acute gout. Colchicine has been widely used but toxicity, especially gastrointestinal adverse effects, are a major concern. Therapeutic regimens involving hourly or 2-hourly administration were based on the short initial half-life of colchicine in plasma. Other therapy schedules, such as early 8-hourly administration, may be equally effective and have fewer adverse effects. Unfortunately, comparative studies to investigate this have not been performed. Colchicine should not be prescribed to patients with either severe renal insufficiency or combined hepatic-renal insufficiency. Doses should be halved in patients with moderate renal function impairment. NSAIDs are the most widely prescribed drugs in the treatment of acute gout. Few comparative data are available, but any of the most potent NSAIDs are probably useful in the control of pain and inflammatory signs of acute gouty arthritis. Pharmacokinetic properties should be taken into account when selecting an NSAID for the treatment of gout, as rapid absorption and a short half-life may help to avoid accumulation in patients with subclinical renal function impairment. Comorbidities should always be kept in mind when prescribing NSAIDs. Patients with previous or recent gastrointestinal bleeding, those receiving anticoagulant therapy or with haemorrhage diathesis, and those with renal insufficiency are at risk of developing severe adverse effects from NSAID administration. Corticosteroids are probably a reasonable choice for patients in whom colchicine and NSAIDs may be hazardous or for those with a history of previous intolerance to these drugs. Few trials using prednisone, prednisolone or triamcinolone acetonide are available, and dosages are prescribed following empirical data. Corticotropin has also been used to treat acute gout. Although it has been proven to be as effective as other corticosteroids or indomethacin, the need for multiple doses, parenteral administration and the high cost are major limitations for its use. Currently, the choice of a drug for the treatment of acute gout will depend on the balance between its efficacy and the potential adverse effects in a particular patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To study the efficacy of allopurinol and benzbromarone to reduce serum urate concentrations in patients with primary chronic gout.Methods: Prospective, parallel, open study of 86 consecutive male patients with primary chronic gout. Forty nine patients (26 normal excretors and 23 under excretors) were given allopurinol 300 mg/day and 37 under excretors benzbromarone 100 mg/day. After achieving steady plasma urate concentrations with such doses, treatment was then adjusted to obtain optimal plasmatic urate concentrations (under 6 mg/dl).Results: Patients receiving allopurinol 300 mg/day showed a mean reduction of plasmatic urate of 2.75 mg/dl (from 8.60 to 5.85 mg/dl) and 3.34 mg/dl (from 9.10 to 5.76 mg/dl) in normal excretors and under excretors respectively. Patients receiving benzbromarone 100 mg/day achieved a reduction of plasmatic urate of 5.04 mg/dl (from 8.58 to 3.54 mg/dl). Fifty three per cent of patients receiving allopurinol and 100% receiving benzbromarone achieved optimal plasma urate concentrations at such doses. The patients with poor results with allopurinol 300 mg/day achieved a proper plasma urate concentration with allopurinol 450 to 600 mg/day, the mean final dose being 372 mg/day. Renal function improved and no case of renal lithiasis was observed among benzbromarone treated patients, whose mean final dose was 76 mg/day.Conclusion: Benzbromarone is very effective to control plasma urate concentrations at doses ranging from 50 to 100 mg/day. Uricosuric treatment is a suitable approach to the treatment of patients with gout who show underexcretion of urate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]