Search

Introduction: A prospective study was started in May 2016 to evaluate the efficacy and safety of particle therapy for intrahepatic cholangial carcinoma (ICC). To compare treatment modalities, we also conducted a meta-analysis of literature data and a systematic comparison using registry data. Methods: Patients who received particle therapy for ICC from May 2016 to June 2018 were registered. Nineteen manuscripts (4 particle therapy, 8 3D-CRT, 7 SBRT) were selected for the meta-analysis. Results: A total of 85 cases (proton beam therapy 59, carbon therapy 26) were registered. The median OS of the 85 patients was 22.1 months (95%CI 12.9-31.3); the 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-year OS rates were 70.9% (95% CI 61.1-80.7%), 47.6% (36.8-58.4%), 37.7% (26.7-48.7%), and 22.7% (10.2-35.2%), respectively; and the 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-year local recurrence rates were 8.2% (1.1-15.3%), 21.6% (9.3-33.9%), 33.4% (16.7-50.1%), and 33.4% (16.7-50.1%), respectively. In the meta-analysis and registry data, the 1-year OS for particle therapy, SBRT and 3D-CRT were 71.8% (95% CI 64.6-77.8%), 59.2% (53.0-64.9%, p=0.0573), and 47.2% (36.8-56.9%, p=0.0004), respectively. The incidence of grade 3 or higher late non-hematological toxicity in the meta-analysis and registry data were 7.4-12% for particle therapy, 6.7-16.7% for SBRT, and 8.1-14.3% for 3D-CRT. Conclusions: Particle therapy achieved a good therapeutic effect for ICC, and a meta-analysis indicated that particle therapy is a better treatment modality than SBRT and 3D-CRT.

Abstract Aim Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with bile duct invasion (BDI) (BDIHCC) has a poor prognosis. Moreover, due to the paucity of reports, there is no consensus regarding optimal management of this clinical condition yet. The aim of this study was to clarify the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy (PBT) for BDIHCC. Methods Between 2009 and 2018, 15 patients with BDIHCC underwent PBT at our institution. The overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicities were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events version 4.0. Results The median follow-up time was 23.4 months (range, 7.9–54.3). The median age was 71 years (range, 58–90 years). Many patients were Child A (n = 8, 53.3%) and most had solitary tumors (n = 11, 73.3%). Additionally, most patients had central type BDI (n = 11, 73%). The median tumor size was 4.0 cm (range, 1.5–8.0 cm). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 80.0%, 58.7% and 40.2%, respectively, and the corresponding LC and PFS rates were 93.3%, 93.3%, and 74.7% and 72.7%, 9.7%, and 0.0%, respectively. Acute grade 1/2 dermatitis (n = 7, 46.7%), and grades 2 (n = 1, 6.7%) and 3 (n = 1, 6.7%) cholangitis were observed. Late toxicities such as grade 3 gastric hemorrhage and pleural effusion were observed. No toxicities of grade 4 or higher were observed. Conclusions PBT was feasible with tolerable toxicities for the treatment of BDIHCC.

Abstract Background To evaluate proton beam therapy (PBT) in multimodal treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus (NPSCC). Methods The cases in this study included T3 and T4 NPSCC without distant metastases that were treated at our center using PBT between July 2003 and December 2020. These cases were classified into 3 groups based on resectability and treatment strategy: surgery followed by postoperative PBT (group A); those indicated to be resectable, but the patient refused surgery and received radical PBT (group B); and those declared unresectable based on the extent of the tumor and treated with radical PBT (group C). Results The study included 37 cases, with 10, 9 and 18 in groups A, B and C, respectively. The median follow-up period in surviving patients was 4.4 years (range 1.0-12.3 years). The 4-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control (LC) rates were 58%, 43% and 58% for all patients; 90%, 70% and 80% in group A, 89%, 78% and 89% in group B; and 24%, 11% and 24% in group C. There were significant differences in OS (p = 0.0028) and PFS (p = 0.009) between groups A and C; and in OS (p = 0.0027), PFS (p = 0.0045) and LC (p = 0.0075) between groups B and C. Conclusions PBT gave favorable outcomes in multimodal treatment for resectable locally advanced NPSCC, including surgery followed by postoperative PBT and radical PBT with concurrent chemotherapy. The prognosis for unresectable NPSCC was extremely poor, and reconsideration of treatment strategies, such as more active use of induction chemotherapy, may improve outcomes.

A female patient in her 50 s was found to have a 10-cm tumor resulting from locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Three-year relapse-free survival was achieved following a multimodal treatment strategy integrating chemoradiotherapy (CRT), regional hyperthermia (RHT), and interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT). Given the large size of the tumor, enhancement of the geometrical dose distribution was anticipated using ISBT. However, delivery of a sufficient dose to the high-risk clinical target volume was predicted to be challenging. Thus, RHT was incorporated to potentially augment the overall treatment effect. This unique combination of CRT, RHT and ISBT may be promising for management of large LACC and warrants further investigation.

Background: Patients who receive radiation therapy sometimes complain of a light flash during irradiation. The details of the characteristics of this light have not been described. Purpose: To evaluate light flashes during photon and proton radiotherapy. Methods and Materials: A prospective observational study was performed in all adult patients (≥20 years old) who received photon and proton therapy at two centers between January 2019 and August 2020, except for patients who could not communicate and those with visual abnormality. Evaluations were obtained for the presence or absence of light flashes, light darkness (7 levels), light intensity (5 levels), frequency, light movement, light flashing, and time seeing the light, using a weekly checklist. Results: A total of 650 courses were examined for 621 patients, of whom 416 received photon radiotherapy and 205 received proton beam therapy. The checklist indicated that 88 patients (16.1%) sensed light during photon or proton radiotherapy. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the factors that were significantly associated with a light flash were a higher retina dose and younger age (p

Light flash and odor during radiation therapy are well-known phenomena, but the details are poorly understood, particularly in pediatric patients. Therefore, we conducted a prospective observational study of these events in pediatric patients (age ≤20 years old) who received radiotherapy at our center from January 2019 to November 2021. Light flash and odor were evaluated using a patient-reported checklist including the presence, strength, and duration of the phenomenon, and color of light or type of odor. 53 patients who received proton therapy (n=47) and photon radiotherapy (n=6) were enrolled in this study. The median age of the patients was 10, ranged from 5 to 20. The patients who was able to see the light flash was 4, and all of them received retina irradiation. This was equivalent to 57% of the patients who received radiotherapy to retina (n=7). The light was bright and colored mainly blue and purple, which seemed to be consistent with Cherenkov light. Odor was sensed by 9 (17%) patients, and seven patients of the 9 received nasal cavity irradiation. This was equivalent to 41% of the patients who received nasal cavity irradiation (n=17). Other 2 patients received proton therapy to brain tumor. The odors were mainly described as plastic, burnt and disinfectant, which may be caused by ozone generated during irradiation. These data suggest that pediatric patients with retinal and nasal cavity irradiation frequently sense light flashes or odor. So adequate care is necessary so that these patients are not worried about this phenomenon.

Background: Hepatic hemangiomas are benign tumors with a favorable prognosis, but giant hepatic hemangiomas can cause abdominal symptoms and are indicated for treatment. Most cases are treated with surgery, but radiotherapy has also been used. However, to date, there have been no reports of proton beam therapy for a hepatic hemangioma. Case presentation: A 46-year-old woman had a tumor of 80 × 80 mm in the left medial lobe of the liver, which was diagnosed as a giant hemangioma based on the contrast pattern. Therapy was required for a giant hepatic hemangioma with symptoms, but the patient refused blood transfusion due to religious reasons, which made surgical resection difficult. Therefore, she was referred to our hospital for proton beam therapy. At her first visit, liver function was Child-Pugh A (5 points) and there was no elevation of tumor markers. Proton beam therapy of 28.6 Gy (RBE) given in 13 fractions was performed without interruption. The only observed acute radiation toxicity was Grade 1 dermatitis. One year after proton beam therapy, the hemangioma had significantly decreased, and a complete response has been maintained for 15 years based on ultrasound and MRI. Conclusion: This case is the first reported use of proton beam therapy for a hepatic hemangioma. The outcome suggests that this treatment may be effective for a giant liver hemangioma.

Background/Aim: Radiotherapy is a salvage therapy type for postoperative recurrence of esophageal cancer. Compared to conventional photon-based radiotherapy, proton beam therapy can reduce the irradiated dose to the surrounding organs, facilitating the management of patients who are unfit for radiotherapy. In this study, the outcomes and toxicity of proton beam therapy for postoperative lymph node oligorecurrence of esophageal cancer were investigated. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes and toxicity of 13 sites in 11 patients treated with proton beam therapy for postoperative lymph node oligorecurrence of esophageal cancer. In total, eight men and three women with a median age of 68 years (range=46-83 years) were included. Results: The median follow-up period was 20.2 months. During the follow-up period, four patients died of esophageal cancer. Eight of the 11 patients developed recurrence; of these, seven patients had recurrence outside the irradiated field, and one had recurrence inside and outside the irradiated field. The 2-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and local control rates were 48.0%, 27.3%, and 84.6%, respectively. The median survival time was 22.4 months. There were no severe acute or late adverse events. Conclusion: Proton beam therapy could be a safe and effective treatment method for postoperative lymph node oligorecurrence of esophageal cancer. It may be beneficial even in cases where conventional photon-based radiotherapy is difficult to administer in combination with increased doses or with chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]