Using univariate and multivariate techniques, we evaluated sexual dimorphism in four external and 51 skeletal measures taken from 66 California Gulls (Larus californicus). Based on analyses of variance, all characters showed statistically significant sexual dimorphism. Skeletal measures of head and pectoral regions were closely correlated but-with elimination of geographic, temporal, and ontogenetic influences-we noted considerable independent variation among characters. Differences between sexes were greatest in the head region (average of 8.03%), with mandible depth being the most dimorphic head character. Differences in the wing region were somewhat less (averaging 6.98%), although still greater than the overall size difference between sexes (i.e., 6.10%; based on the cube root of body weight). Principal components analysis of skeletal characters standardized on the basis of pooled, within-sex standard deviations provided complete separation of males and females. Four skeletal measures (i.e., skull width, mandible length, keel depth, and minimum synsacral width), when used in combination in a stepwise discriminant function, correctly identified to sex all specimens that we used and, it is expected, will do so for most other specimens of this species. Classification functions were developed from the total suite of characters to assign unknown specimens to one or the other sex. Most males and females could also be separated by using combinations of characteristics taken from only one of the five body regions studied (i.e., head, pectoral, wing, pelvic, and leg regions), indicating the widespread nature of sexual dimorphism in California Gulls. Sexual dimorphism in size and shape is almost universal in birds, and numerous theoretical constructs have been developed to explain its ecological and evolutionary significance (e.g., Verner and Willson 1966, Orians 1969, Selander 1972, Ralls 1977). Darwinian sexual selection is likely the most important single cause that generates dimorphism, but other influences also have been considered to be significant. For instance, Selander (1966) presented a case for a relationship between sexual dimorphism and differential niche utilization in birds (i.e., the niche segregation theory) and suggested reasons why such dimorphism would develop. In a number of cases, this explanation has been promoted (e.g., Earhart and Johnson 1970; Robins 1971, Williamson 1971, Wallace 1974); in others, workers have found it necessary to consider alternative hypotheses that take into account bioenergetic pressures, predation pressures, non-monogamous mating systems, or various combinations of these factors (see Sigurj6nsd6ttir 1981 and references therein). The evolutionary significance of sexual dimorphism is still being actively debated. In a variety of studies, there are practical as well as theoretical reasons for wanting to elucidate sexual differences. For instance, gull species are frequent subjects of ethological investigations because gulls are highly colonial, have stereotyped displays, and are relatively easy to observe. Most gulls, however, are monomorphic in plumage, and investigators have difficulty in determining the sex of individual birds. Consequently, a series of works has appeared that provide the basis of identification to sex by using external morphometric characteristics. Studies of this type have been completed for Great Black-backed Gulls (Larus marinus; Harris 1964), Lesser Blackbacked Gulls (L. fuscus; Harris and Hope Jones 1969), Herring Gulls (L. argentatus; Harris and Hope Jones 1969, Shugart 1977, Threlfall and Jewer 1978, Fox et al. 1981), Red-billed Gulls (L. scopulinus; Mills 1971), Ring-billed Gulls (L. delawarensis; Shugart 1977, Ryder 1978), Silver Gulls (L. novaehollandiae; Wooller and Dunlop 1981), and Kelp or Southern Blackbacked Gulls (L. dominicanus; Nugent 1982). Ingolfsson (1969), in a related but more detailed analysis, compared the degree of sexual dimorphism in five species of large gulls, in