Search

Little is known about the bases of parental worry about adolescents' risk for acquiring a sexually transmitted infection (STI). Parents (N = 247) of adolescents 12-17 years endorsed reasons that explained their worry or nonworry. Parents' past experience of an STI, perception of the child's sexual activity, and racial selfidentification were predictors of worry. Cluster analyses identified five groups of worriers and four groups of nonworriers. Worriers tended to select reasons reflecting an external parental locus of control or child-specific reasons. Nonworriers endorsed reasons consistent with internal parental locus of control. Findings suggest that preventive health communication should be tailored to parents' perceptions of risk and protective factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the past 150 years, innovations in immunization practices have dramatically improved the health of children, and parents are increasingly asked to consider and accept new childhood vaccines. We present a conceptual model to frame a review of research on the role of parental attitudes and beliefs in decision making about child and adolescent immunization and describe the historical context of vaccine-related decision-making research. This review focuses on theory-based Social-environmental and parent-specific personal factors as potential influences on vaccine decision making. Relevant Social-environmental issues discussed include media coverage of vaccines, perceived social norms, and the persuasive influence of peer groups. Health care provider recommendations are presented as an exemplar of factors related to the family's interface with the health care system. Personal factors addressed include parental health beliefs, attitudes, and knowledge related to vaccine preventable diseases and immunization, as well as cognitive heuristics that are employed in the decision-making process (e.g., omission bias, protected values, framing of information). Last, promising directions for research and suggestions for clinical practice are presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The high prevalence of genital warts, human papillomavirus (HPV), and the virus's cancer-causing potential warrant that women be well informed about these conditions and measures to prevent them. The purpose of this descriptive study was to examine women's knowledge and beliefs about genital warts, HPV, cervical cancer, and Pap tests. We interviewed 40 women recruited from health clinics in Chicago (20 adults) and Indianapolis (20 adolescents) about these issues. Audiotapes of the interviews were transcribed and analyzed. Among both the adults and adolescents there was a good deal of misunderstanding about symptoms associated with genital warts, about the purpose of Pap smears, and about the association of genital HPV with abnormal Pap smears and cervical cancer. The gaps in women's understanding about this potentially deadly infection suggest the need for more comprehensive education about preventing genital HPV, the infection's possible sequelae, and the significance of Pap screening for cancer detection and prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to examine the attitudes about hypothetical human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines in two groups of women in clinical settings. Twenty adolescent women attending an urban community adolescent health clinic and 20 adult women attending a city health department sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic were recruited to participate in individual interviews. Adolescents were 14-18 years of age (mean 15.6), 75% non-Hispanic white, and 75% sexually experienced. Adults were 20-50 years of age (mean 33.6), 95% African American, and all were sexually experienced. As part of the interview, participants ranked nine hypothetical HPV vaccines in order of acceptability. Each vaccine was uniquely defined as a function of cost ($150, $50, or free), efficacy (50% or 90%), disease targeted (genital warts, cervical cancer, or both), and physician recommendation (not mentioned by a physician or specifically recommended). Rankings by adolescents and adults were highly concordant (Spearman rho = 0.9). Efficacy, physician's recommendation, and cost influenced rankings most strongly. Ranking decisions were often based on complex decision making, in which all characteristics were considered simultaneously. These findings suggest that certain features of an HPV vaccine might significantly affect vaccine acceptability. Vaccine efficacy, physician endorsement, and cost were particularly salient issues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Provides the abstract of the research titled 'Parent-Adolescent Concordance in Reports of Sexuality-Related Behaviors and Attitudes,' which was presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Adolescent Medicine in Seattle, Washington on March 19-22, 2003.

Provides the abstract of the research titled 'Parental Attitudes About Vaccination: Sexual Transmissibility, Efficacy, Severity and Behavioral Prevention,' which was presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Adolescent Medicine in Seattle, Washington on March 19-22, 2003.