Search

Background: The causes of pregnancy failure after intrauterine insemination (IUI) are controversial. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influencing factors on clinical pregnancy after IUI. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 1464 cycles of IUI performed at the Meizhou People's Hospital between March 2014 and June 2023. The χ2 test and logistic regression analysis was applied to assess the associations between the some factors (maternal age, paternal age, cycle type (natural cycle or ovulation induction cycle), hormone level on the day of endometrial transformation (estradiol (E2), luteinizing hormone (LH), and progesterone (P)), endometrial thickness on the day of endometrial transformation, and forward motile sperm concentration after treatment) and pregnancy failure. Results: Among the 1464 IUI cycles in this study, 268 cycles of assisted reproduction resulted in clinical pregnancy, with a clinical pregnancy rate of 18.3%. During the cycles with clinical pregnancy, there were 25 (12.9%) preterm births and 169 (87.1%) full-term births. The E2 level on the day of endometrial transformation in clinical pregnancy group was higher than that in the pregnancy failure group (658.79± 656.02 vs 561.21± 558.83 pg/mL)(P=0.025). The clinical pregnancy group had a higher percentage of endometrial thickness between 8 and 13mm on the day of endometrial transformation than the pregnancy failure group (83.2% vs 75.0%)(P=0.002). The results of regressions analysis showed that low E2 level on the day of endometrial transformation (< 238.3 pg/mL vs ≥ 238.3 pg/mL: OR 1.493, 95% CI: 1.086– 2.052, P=0.014), and endometrial thickness < 8mm on the day of endometrial transformation (< 8mm vs 8– 13mm: OR 1.886, 95% CI: 1.284– 2.771, P=0.001) may increase risk of pregnancy failure performed IUI. Conclusion: Low estradiol level, and endometrial thickness on the day of endometrial transformation may increase risk of pregnancy failure performed intrauterine insemination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Establishing a successful pregnancy depends on the endometrium and the embryo. It is estimated that suboptimal endometrial receptivity account for one-third of implantation failures. Despite the indepth understanding of the processes associated with embryo-endometrial crosstalk, little progress has been achieved for diagnosis and treatments for suboptimal endometrial receptivity. Methods: This retrospective study includedwomen undergoing their first frozenthawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles at our reproductive medicine center from March 2021 to August 2021. Transvaginal three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound was performed in the morning on the day of embryo transfer for all the thawed embryo transfer patients, to evaluate endometrial receptivity, including endometrial thickness, echogenicity, volume, movement and blood flow. Results: A total number of 562 patients of FET with 315 pregnancies (56.0%) was analyzed. It was found that only the echo of the endometrial central line was different between the pregnant group and non-pregnant group. Other parameters, such as endometrial thickness, volume, endometrial peristalsis, or the endometrial blood flow were not statistically different between the two groups. Then, according to the relationship between the different groups and the clinical pregnancy rate, a score of 0 to 2 was respectively scored. The sum of the scores for the six items was the patient's endometrial receptivity score. It showed that the clinical pregnancy rate increased as the endometrial receptivity score increased, and when the receptivity score reaches at least 5, the clinical pregnancy rate is significantly improved (63.7% versus 49.5%, P=0.001). Conclusion: We developed an endometrial receptivity scoring system and demonstrated its validity. It may aid clinicians in choosing the useful marker in clinical practice and for informing further research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Little research is available on follicular development and endometrial receptivity in older women. This study aimed to assess follicular development and endometrial receptivity, and to evaluate ultrasonic parameters in predicting endometrial receptivity during the implantation window in older women.Methods: For this prospective case-control study, 224 older women and 215 young women were recruited. The follicular development and endometrial thickness were monitored by transvaginal ultrasound. During the implantation window, the pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) of the uterine arteries and subendometrial region, endometrial volume, vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI) and vascularization flow index (VFI) were calculated between the two groups. The ultrasonic parameters were used to assess endometrial receptivity in older women.Results: The serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) concentration and antral follicle count (AFC) were significantly lower in older women than in young women. The average diameter of the dominant follicle on days 14, 16, and 18 of the menstrual cycle were significantly smaller, and the subendometrial region RI on days 12, 14, 16, and 18 of the menstrual cycle were significantly higher in older women than in young women. The normal ovulation rate was significantly lower in older women than in young women. The subendometrial region RI was significantly higher, and the endometrial VI, FI, and VFI were significantly lower in older women compared with young women. The biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy rate of older women were significantly lower than in young women. The best ultrasonic parameter for predicting endometrial receptivity during the implantation window in older women was VI (AUC =0.889, sensitivity 92.6% and specificity 85.4%).Conclusions: Older women present decreased serum AMH concentrations and AFC, defined as indicators of ovarian reserve function. Older women are characterized by decreased follicular development and endometrial receptivity, which may lead to fecundity disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: We aimed to compare the different sperm motility parameters in pregnant and non-pregnant patients who underwent IUI in our tertiary center. Material and Methods: Total of 110 gonadotrophin plus IUI patients were evaluated between 2017 January and January 2020 in this retrospective study. Some demographic features and infertility time, post-wash sperm parameters and basal hormone levels were compared between pregnant and non-pregnant patients and the regression analysis method was used to evaluate IUI success between other parameters. Results: Endometrial thickness (9.1±1.4 vs.7.6±1.4 ) on hCG triggering day and, post-wash progressive sperm motility value together with the a ratio and infertility time were correlated well with IUI success (ie pregnacy result ) between 38 pregnant and 72 non pregnant patients. Conclusion: After wash progressive sperm ratio may predict IUI success with infertility time and endometrial thickness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Early reproductive failure is the most common complication of pregnancy with only 30% of conceptions reaching live birth. Establishing a successful pregnancy depends upon implantation, a complex process involving interactions between the endometrium and the blastocyst. It is estimated that embryos account for one-third of implantation failures, while suboptimal endometrial receptivity and altered embryo-endometrial dialogue are responsible for the remaining two-thirds. Endometrial receptivity has been the focus of extensive research for over 80 years, leading to an indepth understanding of the processes associated with embryo-endometrial cross-talk and implantation. However, little progress has been achieved to translate this understanding into clinically meaningful prognostic tests and treatments for suboptimal endometrial receptivity.Objective and Rationale: The objective of this systematic review was to examine the evidence from observational studies supporting the use of endometrial receptivity markers as prognostic factors for pregnancy outcome in women wishing to conceive, in order to aid clinicians in choosing the most useful marker in clinical practice and for informing further research.Search Methods: The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42017077891). MEDLINE and Embase were searched for observational studies published from inception until 26 February 2018. We included studies that measured potential markers of endometrial receptivity prior to pregnancy attempts and reported the subsequent pregnancy outcomes. We performed association and accuracy analyses using clinical pregnancy as an outcome to reflect the presence of receptive endometrium. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies was employed to assess the quality of the included studies.Outcomes: We included 163 studies (88 834 women) of moderate overall quality in the narrative synthesis, out of which 96 were included in the meta-analyses. Studies reported on various endometrial receptivity markers evaluated by ultrasound, endometrial biopsy, endometrial fluid aspirate and hysteroscopy in the context of natural conception, IUI and IVF. Associations were identified between clinical pregnancy and various endometrial receptivity markers (endometrial thickness, endometrial pattern, Doppler indices, endometrial wave-like activity and various molecules); however, their poor ability to predict clinical pregnancy prevents them from being used in clinical practice. Results from several modern molecular tests are promising and further data are awaited.Wider Implications: The post-test probabilities from our analyses may be used in clinical practice to manage couples' expectations during fertility treatments (IUI and IVF). Conventionally, endometrial receptivity is seen as a dichotomous outcome (present or absent), but we propose that various levels of endometrial receptivity exist within the window of implantation. For instance, different transcriptomic signatures could represent varying levels of endometrial receptivity, which can be linked to different pregnancy outcomes. Many studies reported the means of a particular biomarker in those who achieved a pregnancy compared with those who did not. However, extreme values of a biomarker (as opposite to the means) may have significant prognostic and diagnostic implications that are not captured in the means. Therefore, we suggest reporting the outcomes by categories of biomarker levels rather than reporting means of biomarker levels within clinical outcome groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]