Search

Background: Working memory (WM) limitations have been suggested as a significant source of the linguistic processing deficits observed in individuals with aphasia (IWA). Digits forward (DF) and digits backward (DB) span tasks are frequently used to study WM in both healthy and clinical populations. Unfortunately only a handful of studies have explored digit span in IWA. Aims: The purpose of the current study is to measure the DF and DB spans of IWA and compare their digit spans to a group with right brain damage, but no aphasia (RBD). Additionally, DF and DB span is compared within each group to determine if there is indeed a performance differential that may support the idea that DB is a more difficult WM task in these populations. Methods & Procedures: A total of 17 IWA and 14 individuals with RBD participated in a DF and DB span task. Modifications to the span tasks were implemented to accommodate language deficits. A series of two digits were orally presented to each participant continuing to a maximum of eight digits. There were seven trials per digit series. Participants were asked to point to the correct order of digits on a written one- to nine-digit list provided on individual note cards or to verbally repeat the numbers if the participant was able to do so. Outcomes & Results: IWA demonstrated shorter digit spans than the RBD group. Both groups performed worse on the DB span tasks than the DF span tasks. Conclusions: The results are consistent with previous studies suggesting that DB span is shorter than DF span in other populations and that there are differences in performance on digit span tasks between the two groups. The differences between RBD group and IWA may be explained by decreased attentional capacity or inefficient resource allocation in IWA, or alternatively, a deficient phonological loop. Future studies should explore these possibilities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Motor dysfunction in the contralateral hand has been well characterised after stroke. The ipsilateral hand has received less attention, yet may provide valuable insights into the structure of the motor system and the nature of the recovery process. By tracking motor function of both hands beginning in the acute stroke period in patients with cortical versus subcortical lesions, we sought to understand the functional anatomy of the ipsilateral deficit.Methods: We examined 30 patients with first-ever unilateral hemiparetic stroke, 23 with subcortical lesions affecting the corticospinal tract, seven with cortical involvement. Patients performed hand dynamometry and the 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) with each hand at 24-48 h, 1 week, 3 months and 1 year after stroke. Linear regression was used to compare the two different motor tasks in each hand. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare recovery rates of the two tasks in the first 3 months.Results: Ipsilateral 9HPT scores averaged z = -7.1, -3.6, -2.5 and -2.3 at the four time points whereas grip strength was unaffected. The initial degree of impairment of grip strength in the contralateral hand did not correlate with the degree of impairment of 9HPT in either the contralateral or ipsilateral hand (r = 0.001, p = 0.98), whereas the initial degree of impairment of 9HPT in the contralateral hand correlated with the degree of impairment of 9HPT in the ipsilateral hand (r = 0.79, p = 0.035). The rate of recovery also differed for the two tasks (p = 0.005).Conclusion: Ipsilateral motor deficits are demonstrable immediately after stroke and extend into the subacute and chronic recovery period. Dissociation between grip strength and dexterity support the notion that dexterity and grip strength operate as anatomically and functionally distinct entities. Our findings in patients with subcortical lesions suggest that the model of white matter tract injury needs to be refined to reflect the influence of a subcortical lesion on bi-hemispheral cortical networks, rather than as a simple "severed cable" model of disruption of corticofugal fibres. Our data have implications for both stroke clinical trials and the development of new strategies for therapeutic intervention in stroke recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]