Search

Objective To investigate the teaching needs of clinical skills and scientific research skills in standardized training of surgical residents and to crient teaching remodeling. Methods A self-filling questionnaire survey was conducted in July 2018. Surgical residents of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, who are at the second and the third year of training, were gathered to sit in separate in classrooms. The filling methods and matters needing attention were explained uniformly. The trainees filled in the form of “back-to-back” by themselves. Totally 85 questionnaires were collected and 83 questionnaires were valid. This paper mainly investigates the training needs of clinical diagnosis and treatment, operation skills and scientific research skills. Results The demand of clinical skills is mostly manifested in the diagnosis and treatment of common surgical diseases and surgical teaching. The most demanded surgical teaching was “hand-holding” and acting as a assistant or master knife. The main requirements of scientific research skills are data collection, statistical methods (Meta analysis), scientific research design and project establishment, tender writing and bidding, and paper writing and publication. Conclusions The needs of surgical residents reflect their deficiencies in the diagnosis and treatment of common diseases, operation skill and research capacity. For this reason, the Surgical Teaching Group has put forward such reform schemes as “tutorial system” “animal model” “all-factor simulated surgery” “more scientific research training courses” and so on.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common gastrointestinal malignancy, and recurrence and metastasis contribute considerably to its high mortality. It is well known that the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) accelerates the rate of cancer cell dissemination and migration, thus promoting cancer metastasis. Targeted therapy is a common modality for cancer treatment, and it can play a role in inhibiting cancer progression. In this study, bioinformatics was used to search for genes associated with the prognosis of CRC. First, differential analysis was performed on colon and rectal cancer samples to obtain 2,840 and 3,177 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), respectively. A Venn diagram was then used to identify 262 overlapping genes from the two groups of DEGs and EMT-related genes. The overlapping genes were subjected to batch survival analysis and batch expression analysis successively, and nine genes were obtained whose high expression in CRC led to a poor prognosis. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) prognostic model was then constructed to obtain the risk score formula. A nomogram was constructed to seek prognostic independent factors to obtain CDKN2A. Finally, CCK-8 assay, flow cytometry and western blotting assays were performed to analyze the cellular biological function of CDKN2A. The results showed that knockdown of CDKN2A expression inhibited HT-29 cell proliferation, promoted apoptosis and cell cycle progression, and affected the EMT process in CRC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME) are standard treatments of stage II/III locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), currently. Here, we evaluated the oncological outcomes in LARC patients treated with NACRT compared to TME alone, and determined whether tumor regression grade (TRG) and pathologic response after NACRT was related to prognosis. Methods: This is a retrospective comparison of 358 LARC patients treated with either TME alone (non‐NACRT group, n = 173) or NACRT plus TME (NACRT group, n = 185) during 2003–2013. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes, like overall survival (OS), disease‐free survival (DFS) and recurrence were compared using 1:1 propensity score matching analysis. Results: A total of 133 patients were matched for the analysis. After a median follow‐up of 45 months (8–97 months), the 5‐year OS (NACRT vs non‐NACRT: 75.42% vs 72.76%; P = 0.594) and 5‐year DFS (NACRT vs non‐NACRT: 74.25% vs 70.13%; P = 0.224) were comparable between NACRT and non‐NACRT, whereas the 5‐year DFS rate was higher in the NACRT group when only stage IIIb/IIIc patients were considered (NACRT vs. non‐NACRT: 74.79% vs. 62.29%; P = 0.056). In the NACRT group of 185 patients, those with pCR/stage I (vs stage II/stage III disease) or TRG3/TRG4 disease (vs TRG0/TRG1/TRG2) had significantly better prognosis. Conclusion: NACRT might provide survival benefit in patients with stage IIIb/IIIc locally advanced rectal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) has recently emerged as a promising novel surgical procedure for rectal cancer. It is believed to hold the potential advantage of providing better access to mobilize the distal rectum and achieving better pathologic results. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of taTME for rectal cancer and summarize the preliminary experience in 10 Chinese hospitals. Methods A total of 211 patients were enrolled in this study. Variables for evaluation of safety, feasibility, and oncologic outcomes were retrospectively collected and analysed. Results The median distance between the tumor and the anal verge was 5.9 cm (range, 1.5–12 cm). The median operating time was 280 min (range, 70–600 min) and the median estimated intra-operative blood loss was 50 mL (range, 10–1,500 mL). The overall rate of complication was 27.9%. Among the 211 patients, 175 (82.9%) had complete TME and 33 (15.6%) had near complete TME. The circumferential resection margin was negative in 97.7% of patients. The patients were followed for a median of 35 months (range, 2–86 months). There was 7.6% (16) mortality, 6.2% (13) had local recurrence, and 12.8% (27) had systemic recurrence. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that 1-, 2-, and 3-year disease-free survival rates were 94.8%, 89.3%, and 80.2%, respectively, and 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 97.4%, 95.7%, and 92.9%, respectively. Conclusions Although limited by its retrospective nature, taTME was safe and feasible in selected patients. Future work with rigorous data recording is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To evaluate the feasibility, short- and long-term outcomes, and safety of laparoscopic resection for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) in solid organ transplant recipients. Methods: Between September 2001 and April 2016, five patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted resection for CRC after solid organ transplantation were included in this study. Their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed with regard to patient demographics, immunosuppressive therapy, tumor characteristics, surgical outcomes, and follow-up data. Results: Four kidney and one heart transplant recipients were included. Laparoscopic-assisted low anterior resection was performed in four patients with rectal or rectosigmoid junction cancer, and sigmoidectomy was done in one with sigmoid colon cancer. One kidney transplant patient received a protective loop transverse colostomy. All resections achieved complete tumor removal with tumor-free margins and total mesorectal excision, with an average number of 14 lymph nodes harvested. Most tumors were in stage III (n = 3), one was in stage II, and one in stage IV. The mean duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay were 144 min, 105 mL, and 8.8 days, respectively. No major complications occurred and graft function stayed well. During a mean follow-up period of 62 months, two patients developed metastasis and died eventually. Conclusion: Laparoscopic resection for advanced CRC in organ transplant recipients is technically feasible and therapeutically safe, and seems to have the advantages of few postoperative complications, short recovery time, and acceptable oncological outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for the treatment of early-stage rectal cancer has attracted attention due to its advantages of reduced surgical trauma, fewer complications, low operative mortality, rapid postoperative recovery and short hospital stay. However, there are still significant controversies regarding TEM for the treatment of rectal cancer, mainly related to the prognosis associated with this method. Objective: This study sought to compare the efficacy of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) and total mesorectal excision (TME) for the treatment of T1 rectal cancer. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase and CNKI databases. Based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews, we screened the trials, evaluated the quality and extracted the data. Results: One randomized controlled trial (RCT) and six non-randomized controlled clinical trials (CCTs) were included in the meta-analysis (a total of 860 rectal cancer patients were included; 303 patients were treated with TEM, and 557 patients were treated with TME). Analysis revealed that all seven studies reported local recurrence rates, and there was a significant difference between the TEM and TME groups [odds ratio (OR) = 4.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) (2.03, 10.53), P = 0.0003]. A total of five studies reported distant metastasis rates, and there was no significant difference between the TEM and TME groups [OR = 0.74, 95%CI (0.32, 1.72), P = 0.49]. A total of six studies reported postoperative overall survival of the patients, and there was no significant difference between the TEM and TME groups [OR = 0.87, 95%CI(0.55, 1.38), P = 0.55]. In addition, two studies reported the postoperative disease-free survival rates of patients, and there was no significant difference between the TEM and TME groups [OR = 1.12, 95%CI (0.31, 4.12), P = 0.86]. Conclusions: For patients with T1 rectal cancer, the distant metastasis, overall survival and disease-free survival rates did not differ between the TEM and TME groups, although the local recurrence rate after TEM was higher than that after TME. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this work was to determine whether locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) with negative mesorectal fascia (MRF) predicted by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be excluded from preoperative radiation therapy treatment. This multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with LARC within 6 to 12 cm from the anal verge and with negative MRI-predicted MRF. Participants were randomized to the intervention group (primary surgery, in which the patients with positive pathologic [CRM] circumferential margins were subjected to chemoradiotherapy [CRT] and those with negative CRM underwent adjuvant chemotherapy according to pathologic staging) or the control group (preoperative CRT, in which all patients underwent subsequent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). A total of 275 patients were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 140) and control (n = 135) groups, in which 33.57% and 28.15% patients were at clinical T4 stage and 85.92% and 80.45% patients were at "bad" or "ugly" risk in the intervention and control groups, respectively. There were 2 patients (1.52%) and 1 patient (0.77%) with positive CRM in the intervention and control groups, respectively (P >.05). The non-adherence rates for the intervention and control groups were 3.6% and 23.7%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 34.6 months (IQR, 18.2-45.7), 43 patients had positive events (28 patients and 15 patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively). There were 6 patients (4.4%) with local recurrence in the intervention group and none in the control group, which led to the termination of the trial. The 3-year DFS rate was 81.82% in the intervention group (95% CI, 78.18%-85.46%) and 85.37% in the control group (95% CI, 81.75%-88.99%), with a difference of –3.55% (95% CI, –3.71% to –3.39%; hazard ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 0.94-3.30). In the per-protocol data set, the difference between 3-year DFS rates was –5.44% (95% CI, –5.63% to –5.25%; hazard ratio, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.01-4.06). Based on the outcomes of this trial, in patients with LARC and MRI-negative MRF, primary surgery could negatively influence their DFS rates. Therefore, primary surgery was an inferior strategy compared with preoperative CRT followed by surgery and cannot be recommended for patients with LARC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The extent of lymphadenectomy during laparoscopic right colectomy can affect the oncological outcome and the safety of surgery. The principle of complete mesocolic excision (CME) has been gradually accepted and increasingly applied by colorectal surgeons. The aim of this study is to investigate whether extended lymphadenectomy (CME) in laparoscopic colectomy could improve the oncological outcomes of patients with right-sided colon cancers, compared with D2 lymphadenectomy.Methods/design: The Radical Extent of lympadenectomy: D2 dissection versus complete mesocolic excision of LAparoscopic Right Colectomy for right-sided colon cancer (RELARC) study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial in which 1072 eligible patients with right-sided colon cancers will be randomly assigned to the CME group or the D2 dissection group during laparoscopic right colectomy. Inclusion criteria are locally advanced colon cancers situated from the cecum to the right third of the transverse colon and clinically staged as T2-4aN0M0 or TanyN + M0. The primary endpoint of this trial is 3-year disease-free survival. Secondary endpoints include 3-year overall survival, postoperative complication rates, perioperative mortality rates, and rates of positive central lymph nodes (the station 3 nodes).Discussion: The RELARC trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that will provide evidence on the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy during laparoscopic right colectomy in terms of better oncological outcome and operation safety.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02619942 . Registered on 29 November 2015. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]